Topic: [XMR] Monero Speculation - page 103. (Read 3313076 times)

I am not whishing that to you, but i am a little bit happy if monero dips and also if BTC dips so let's have a cup of tea and see 

Don't wish that on me bro   

Let's see in a week if BTC or Monero is bouncing back 

haha I bought more.

Bouncing back a bit now.

Two men looked out from prison bars... one saw the mud and the other saw stars.

Note to self:  don't worry!

Let's see if BTC rushes up to 10k and Monero can get a hold of that bull then i will have some candy when Monero dips under 0,0069, if 

I should have waited to buy back but I feel better having the coins then taking the chance I might not get them back again.

EDIT: POST 10K

Sorry, I didn't read what you would set the fees for makers at... I still didn't see that in your long-winded response either.

It's ok, don't worry about it!

I sold some, waiting for the dip 

There are plenty asset platforms out there already. Problem is that games dont want to bother with additional things. Store blockhain asset in secure wallets. I guess for that new generation of gamers will have to grow. We will see.  If Risto would ever want to put any of his game asset on blockchain he could easily do it back then.
[/quote]

I agree that it's a very "meh" thing to think about if you are just talking about assets for games and what not.  What's exciting thinking for me when thinking about Tari is how it will allow true peer-to-peer sells of things such as music concert/sporting events/etc. tickets over the internet, as well as COA's for things like art, property, etc. 

I'm a big fan of all things live music for instance, and I hate the fact that ticketmaster has essentially monopolized the ticket trading/selling for people to do themselves.  They force bands to go through their system, and it's all digital scans rather than real ticket stubs any more.  Sure people can screen shot that code and "sell" it to someone else, but the buyer can't verify that it's legit until they get up to the person scanning tickets and have to hope they get in. 

I still don't know much about Tari and how it's similar/not similar to Eth and all other "smart asset" platforms, but if there can be something that is a "privacy focused" digital asset platform that uses "opt in" publicity for non-fungible tokens assets like a concert ticket would be, will be exciting to watch.

All crypto currencies are very volatile. Actually last two months all other asset is very volatile also.  But if you compare only crypto, Monero is one of most stable coins beside Bitcoin.




There are plenty asset platforms out there already. Problem is that games dont want to bother with additional things. Store blockhain asset in secure wallets. I guess for that new generation of gamers will have to grow. We will see.  If Risto would ever want to put any of his game asset on blockchain he could easily do it back then.

@BayArea I kinda agree with this. I have maybe only once or twice been maker and that's for some really shit coins I can't remember where there was almost nothing on the table close to average. I don't really understand why makers are rewarded more, if we don't take, nothing happens no matter what.

Like the pizza bitcoin guy. He's the hero for sure, but if no one accepted his offer, so what? They're the unsung heroes.

Do I have to repeat myself?  To have liquidity you've got to have market makers; to have an order book at all, you need market makers.
You can't have too many market makers, and if you've got more takers than makers, the market's going to disappear altogether.
Seems to me the makers are a bit more important than the takers.
Makers are, most emphatically, not parasites or getting some kind of free ride.
In fact, market risk rides on market makers' shoulders.
Makerz gonna make;
Takerz gonna take.

Everyone quick buy Monero with your shiny Bitcoins before the dip again.     

What would you suggest?

I'm kind of a taker myself.  It makes me feel bad when a maker is rewarded... takers drive profits (or losses) regardless of maker liquidity and isn't that the point of the game in Crypto?  Then you dump huge loads OTC!  

(It should be noted that "Swap" charges 1% on top of that .2% XChange charges.  Our prices do change as we continue to gain confidence in our product.  XChange for example started out at .5% and is now .2%.)

If you want liquidity, you need to set lower fees for makers than for takers.  Exchange FAQ says all fees 0.2%

FreeBitcoins.com has launched an additional XMR platform that allows for users to easily buy or sell XMR without creating an account on our exchange.

FreeBitcoins.com/swap

For people who don't want to be involved with Javascript or whatever, our API for Swap can be found here:  https://freebitcoins.com/swap/api.html

Our deposits count correctly and the withdraws are near-instant.  We could use more liquidity on our books though, as the liquidity grows... everything else will follow.  We would rather work for liquidity than fake it!

I hope a few of you try it out and find it useful.  We also have an affiliate program that pays 50% of our fees for Swap and Xchange with just a single simple link!

Thank you!

Hey think he read this and rage dumped?

Anyone know if he ever got that 100,000XMR back from Polo?

Me too if being totally honest.

Risto helped to solidify my decision to invest here.

And he wasn't wrong, a great coin.



All the other shit since then when he robbed loads of BTCTalk people of millions is why I cant pallet him now.


I was still a full fanboy until then.

Honestly I feel very lucky I found the Risto shit game too difficult to understand. Or I would also be one of the lost thousands stories.



How he has the gaul to reappear here I have no idea.

The robbing loser fuck must have no shame at all.

In itself a shame.