[XMR] rpietila Monero Economics thread - page 20.

HardwarePal

hero member

Activity: 565

Merit: 500

Quote from: dreamspark on July 22, 2014, 06:35:44 AM

Quote from: HardwarePal on July 22, 2014, 06:31:40 AM

For me the 300-400K is a non-issue and will be gobbled up on the market in roughly 3-6months when people see the true longterm value of Monero.

We're not saying its an issue, we're speculating about the amount and weight of the top few holders.

If someone still has that many coins now with all the attention around XMR they are unlikely to be offloading a significant amount due to liquidity and by the time its liquid enough they won't want to sell them, in fact who does? Wink

True but not everyone follows the 10/200 strategy http://david.latapie.name/blog/extended-10200-strategy/ like David has analysed.

Then we have some people that need the money and some that are happy with X $ amount or do it solely for BTC.

For the next 4 years I think that XMR will strive but the issue after the initial emission curve to me is something Fred Wilson from Paypal has mentioned :

“I also think we need to see real transaction volume happen. Right now, most people who get bitcoin hold it, they don’t transact with it. That’s part of what causes all of the volatility — if there was a very vibrant system where bitcoin was just getting swapped around like crazy, the velocity of the money would cause bitcoin’s price to stabilize and there would be a much more liquid market. I think those are the kinds of things an economist would want to see.”

I think Father Risto is not far of with his 260K calculation for the top holder

"I am now fairly certain that the 5 largest holders together own 20-35% of the total supply" this will probably be lower in the future imo.

dreamspark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: HardwarePal on July 22, 2014, 06:31:40 AM

For me the 300-400K is a non-issue and will be gobbled up on the market in roughly 3-6months when people see the true longterm value of Monero.

We're not saying its an issue, we're speculating about the amount and weight of the top few holders.

If someone still has that many coins now with all the attention around XMR they are unlikely to be offloading a significant amount due to liquidity and by the time its liquid enough they won't want to sell them, in fact who does? Wink

HardwarePal

hero member

Activity: 565

Merit: 500

Quote from: rpietila on July 22, 2014, 05:29:14 AM

Quote from: dreamspark on July 22, 2014, 03:50:16 AM

I however dont believe the top holder has that many anyway hence why I was asking where the 400k figure came from.

Little birds mentioned that number as the high point of one early miner some time ago. So it is not necessarily the case that:

A. It is accurate
B. It still holds
C. It has come solely from mining.

After repeated statistical runs on the data, I am now fairly certain that the 5 largest holders together own 20-35% of the total supply. The largest one alone has near certainly more than 100k, likely even 200k, but not likely more than 300k as of now. (400k would be an outlier.)

This is all statistics, but with statistics on my side, I have become what I am financially, since I started investing in 1996. Grin

I dont think that even 300K-400K would be much of an issue even now in the early stages with excessive inflation (1.1%) due to the emission curve. Most people will sell off in the 0.01+ range.

We are in the still in the speculation phase of the technology with alot more people moving into the coin after doing their due diligence, even though there are rough issues that are being worked on.

I have 4 friends that have invested 10-50BTC each this past weekend , that I have been pestering for over a month to do their research.

Not everyone will psychologically handle the markets ups and downs and hold their coins throughout those phases.

dreamspark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rpietila on July 22, 2014, 05:29:14 AM

Quote from: dreamspark on July 22, 2014, 03:50:16 AM

I however dont believe the top holder has that many anyway hence why I was asking where the 400k figure came from.

Little birds mentioned that number as the high point of one early miner some time ago. So it is not necessarily the case that:

A. It is accurate
B. It still holds
C. It has come solely from mining.

After repeated statistical runs on the data, I am now fairly certain that the 5 largest holders together own 20-35% of the total supply. The largest one alone has near certainly more than 100k, likely even 200k, but not likely more than 300k as of now. (400k would be an outlier.)

This is all statistics, but with statistics on my side, I have become what I am financially, since I started investing in 1996. Grin

Thanks.

On the lower bound of your estimate, 20%, that would give you a figure for the five holders of total 453,400.
On the upper bound of your estimate, 35%, that would give you a figure for the five holder of total 793,450.

With the upper bound meaning an average of 158,690 per person and the lower bound meaning an average of 90,680 to me thats quite a large difference. If for arguments sake we say the top holder has 200k how do you see the following 4 players being weighted? Normally with alts the value tends to stay lower for a longer period of time that allows these "super holders" to quietly accumalate these high quantities of coins.

In XMR's case it is and has been a relatively high priced coin (for a brand new alt) since the beggining. For your figures in regards to the top 5 and their holding percentage you would therefore suppose that they deep pockets in the first place? I guess what Im getting at is from my POV the ownership is more spread than this is suggesting and I'm trying to think of scenarios where 5 people would still hold 35% of the total supply as as a miner production cost (anytime after the first few weeks) has been relatively high.

rpietila

donator

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1036

Quote from: dreamspark on July 22, 2014, 03:50:16 AM

I however dont believe the top holder has that many anyway hence why I was asking where the 400k figure came from.

Little birds mentioned that number as the high point of one early miner some time ago. So it is not necessarily the case that:

A. It is accurate
B. It still holds
C. It has come solely from mining.

After repeated statistical runs on the data, I am now fairly certain that the 5 largest holders together own 20-35% of the total supply. The largest one alone has near certainly more than 100k, likely even 200k, but not likely more than 300k as of now. (400k would be an outlier.)

This is all statistics, but with statistics on my side, I have become what I am financially, since I started investing in 1996. Grin

Its About Sharing

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1000

Antifragile

Quote from: Macno on July 22, 2014, 02:25:31 AM

Hi,

is there a post somewhere which explains the (economic) differences between XMR and DRK in a not too technical way?
Of all the Anon-Coins, I am only invested in DRK so far but you guys seem pretty sure XMR is better (you don`t even mention DRK) and I`d like to know why.
Unfortunately it is pretty hard to find such informations, as any Altcoin-community seems to act like some kind of sect, flaming at anyone who even mentions another coin. Diversification seems to be less popular than going all in into the coin one fell in love with...but this thread sounds reasonable so far, so I ask here instead of the DRK thread Cheesy

I hope the question is not OT though.

(Edit: rpietila is the famous "Risto" I heard mentioned so many times?)

If you search this thread there were some great points brought up by Aminorex and others on why Monero's Cryptonote is superior (in many ways) to Darks mixing.
At a superficial, yet very important layer, the name Monero sounds nice, Dark is Dark. Not saying that is bad. But just look at what happened to Dark Market - immediately
the source was taken and Open Bazaar was formed. There is a lot to a name (fortunately or unfortunately).

I'm not as technical when it comes to the security, but even looking at things like Volume say alot. Monero (not listed here) would be the number 3 coin! http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/coins/info

Today:
Darks total volume Using - http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/#jump-drk-btc = 167 BTC
Monero's total volume Using - http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/#jump-xmr-btc =357 BTC

Now, volume isn't the tell all, but this has been the pattern of late. I think many who hold DRK really must wonder how they will spend them in the future (outside of person to person).
Not saying it doesn't succeed as there is plenty of space, but it looks like it is starting to fall out of favor. Monero has been REALLY gaining traction.

IAS

dreamspark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: smooth on July 21, 2014, 05:02:49 PM

Quote from: dreamspark on July 21, 2014, 05:26:21 AM

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 01:54:28 PM

Perhaps we can go deeper to the mystery of the 400k guy? To have a 25% share of the coins at any time, it requires that he would have needed to have 25% of the hashpower uninterruptedly from the beginning to the end, AND the opportunity cost of such power would've been 100s of BTC. The only realistic way to do it would have been a privileged miner with much lower electricity cost that that of the others.

Or he would have bought 25% of all the new supply in the exchanges (which is ludicrous, since many miners don't sell, so 1 guy would have bought like half of the coins brought for sale, from day 1 on...)

If you ask me, it is more likely that the biggest holder now is found in the 140-280k XMR range. It just gets too difficult and not profitable enough to actually corner 25% of the supply. With such resources (100s of BTC) you have other things to do...

This way logic can be applied.

Where does the 400k come from ?

At times during the early mining phases one player had far more than 25% of the hash (think closer to 60%). The market was also much smaller so the diff was lower and you could have well over half the network for a rather cheap (in hindsight at least) sum. Some people are miners for a living and as such with 100's of BTC's the best thing they feel to do is use it to make/mine more.

No one had that dominant a share of mining for a sustained period of time. I can say this with near 100% certainty, but not quite 100% because various contrived conspiracy theories make it theoretically possible. I can say with absolute 100% certainly that no one had more than 70-75%

Given the significant fraction of all mined coins that changed hands on OTC and the cryptonote exchange in the early days I think it is fair to say that if someone accumulated 400k (around 20 days of full output) it was likely due to buying rather than mining.

I didn't say 70-75% I said think closer to 60% than 25%. I know that for absolute certain that a player has had close to 50% of the hash for a significant amount of time. Anyways, theres no point arguing about it because it not easily provable and frankly makes no difference which of us is right.

If you mined from almost the beggining with close to 50% hash you could theoretically get 400k in 40 days. I however dont believe the top holder has that many anyway hence why I was asking where the 400k figure came from.

Macno

legendary

Activity: 984

Merit: 1000

Hi,

is there a post somewhere which explains the (economic) differences between XMR and DRK in a not too technical way?
Of all the Anon-Coins, I am only invested in DRK so far but you guys seem pretty sure XMR is better (you don`t even mention DRK) and I`d like to know why.
Unfortunately it is pretty hard to find such informations, as any Altcoin-community seems to act like some kind of sect, flaming at anyone who even mentions another coin. Diversification seems to be less popular than going all in into the coin one fell in love with...but this thread sounds reasonable so far, so I ask here instead of the DRK thread Cheesy

I hope the question is not OT though.

(Edit: rpietila is the famous "Risto" I heard mentioned so many times?)

stellarman

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Thanks, Risto. Good thread.

Following.

Skinnkavaj

sr. member

Activity: 469

Merit: 250

English Motherfucker do you speak it ?

Quote from: damashup on July 21, 2014, 05:58:14 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on July 21, 2014, 10:49:32 AM

Quote from: dga on July 20, 2014, 07:14:45 PM

Quote from: damashup on July 20, 2014, 04:36:07 PM

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 06:55:17 AM

After hearing that many are positioning such that they hold 100:1 (XMR:BTC), which is about 25% in XMR, or even 400:1, which is more than half in XMR, I also set myself up to acquire a larger position. That was a contributing factor in the rise last week but I am not even nearly done. It just does not feel right to sell XMR to receive BTC when you are already as loaded with BTC as I am.

What would your advice be to people like me (relative newcomers to cryptocurrencies) holding little or no Bitcoin? There are only three coins that hold my interest Bitcoin and Monero being two of them. I'm currently holding at a ratio of 2000:1 (XMR:BTC) with a view to raking into a few more BTC each time the price of XMR doubles.

I see the growth in XMR outstripping that of all other coins (including BTC) over the next 6-9 months. If it doesn't perform as I expect in that period, I may then look to pull back.

Sound sensible or too bullish?

This is all a question of how you want to allocate your risk.

My general view is that having some %age of your investment portfolio in high risk investments is good (and that %age depends on your age and financial picture). But the smart way to manage high risk is to diversify into multiple individual high risk investments -- so if you've allocated 1% of your total wealth to high-risk investments, don't put all 1% of it in XMR. But if that 2000 XMR represents only 1% of your high risk portfolio, then what's wrong with it?

(I consider BTC part of my high risk portfolio also - but I have about 1000:1 BBR to BTC, and that's a leveraged gamble where I'm hoping that giving source code and technical commentary back helps moderate the risk.)

Also your risk should change based on your age and lifestyle. If you're closing in on retirement you might want to put less into high risk investments (bitcoin) and super high risk investments (monero).

Also, dga, why are you invested in BBR and not Monero?

Thank you both for the advice. I was more concerned with how I should be investing in Monero relative to Bitcoin (as a non-Bitcoin holder), as oppose to where crypto-currencies should sit in my general investment portfolio.

I agree this is less 'investing' more speculating/ gambling. As such my inclination is to go 'back' on one currency (Monero) and hedge with another (Bitcoin). Boolberry was the third currency that I'm taking an interest in btw - it would certainly be my darkhorse for success & I love rooting for the underdog!

Boolberry is a terrible name. Monero sounds much more legitimate and serious.

damashup

sr. member

Activity: 259

Merit: 250

Quote from: drawingthesun on July 21, 2014, 10:49:32 AM

Quote from: dga on July 20, 2014, 07:14:45 PM

Quote from: damashup on July 20, 2014, 04:36:07 PM

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 06:55:17 AM

After hearing that many are positioning such that they hold 100:1 (XMR:BTC), which is about 25% in XMR, or even 400:1, which is more than half in XMR, I also set myself up to acquire a larger position. That was a contributing factor in the rise last week but I am not even nearly done. It just does not feel right to sell XMR to receive BTC when you are already as loaded with BTC as I am.

What would your advice be to people like me (relative newcomers to cryptocurrencies) holding little or no Bitcoin? There are only three coins that hold my interest Bitcoin and Monero being two of them. I'm currently holding at a ratio of 2000:1 (XMR:BTC) with a view to raking into a few more BTC each time the price of XMR doubles.

I see the growth in XMR outstripping that of all other coins (including BTC) over the next 6-9 months. If it doesn't perform as I expect in that period, I may then look to pull back.

Sound sensible or too bullish?

This is all a question of how you want to allocate your risk.

My general view is that having some %age of your investment portfolio in high risk investments is good (and that %age depends on your age and financial picture). But the smart way to manage high risk is to diversify into multiple individual high risk investments -- so if you've allocated 1% of your total wealth to high-risk investments, don't put all 1% of it in XMR. But if that 2000 XMR represents only 1% of your high risk portfolio, then what's wrong with it?

(I consider BTC part of my high risk portfolio also - but I have about 1000:1 BBR to BTC, and that's a leveraged gamble where I'm hoping that giving source code and technical commentary back helps moderate the risk.)

Also your risk should change based on your age and lifestyle. If you're closing in on retirement you might want to put less into high risk investments (bitcoin) and super high risk investments (monero).

Also, dga, why are you invested in BBR and not Monero?

Thank you both for the advice. I was more concerned with how I should be investing in Monero relative to Bitcoin (as a non-Bitcoin holder), as oppose to where crypto-currencies should sit in my general investment portfolio.

I agree this is less 'investing' more speculating/ gambling. As such my inclination is to go 'back' on one currency (Monero) and hedge with another (Bitcoin). Boolberry was the third currency that I'm taking an interest in btw - it would certainly be my darkhorse for success & I love rooting for the underdog!

damashup

sr. member

Activity: 259

Merit: 250

Quote from: aminorex on July 20, 2014, 06:47:44 PM

So far I have never regreted buying xmr - not even at the ath, although I was then buying fewer. If your holding time goes out to 500 days emission is halved. If xmr is not destroyed in that time your holdings will likely rise in value in proportion to exp(n_nodes^2) over that time. Plan accordingly.

Thanks - will consider holding at least until the emission halves. Although, I'm banking on significant technical advances as the coin moves from alpha to beta stage - will take that to create a demand that will outstrip supply over that period.

Given the emission rate, 'Miners Economics' will also be key to the success of XMR. Let's hope a good portion can afford to hold for medium/ long term.

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Anyone keeping a 20K+ holders list?

I have mine but not long enough to warrant posting yet.

In other news:
Risto please no more buy walls till Friday. I'm waiting for some BTC's to hit coinbase so I can buy

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: dreamspark on July 21, 2014, 05:26:21 AM

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 01:54:28 PM

Perhaps we can go deeper to the mystery of the 400k guy? To have a 25% share of the coins at any time, it requires that he would have needed to have 25% of the hashpower uninterruptedly from the beginning to the end, AND the opportunity cost of such power would've been 100s of BTC. The only realistic way to do it would have been a privileged miner with much lower electricity cost that that of the others.

Or he would have bought 25% of all the new supply in the exchanges (which is ludicrous, since many miners don't sell, so 1 guy would have bought like half of the coins brought for sale, from day 1 on...)

If you ask me, it is more likely that the biggest holder now is found in the 140-280k XMR range. It just gets too difficult and not profitable enough to actually corner 25% of the supply. With such resources (100s of BTC) you have other things to do...

This way logic can be applied.

Where does the 400k come from ?

At times during the early mining phases one player had far more than 25% of the hash (think closer to 60%). The market was also much smaller so the diff was lower and you could have well over half the network for a rather cheap (in hindsight at least) sum. Some people are miners for a living and as such with 100's of BTC's the best thing they feel to do is use it to make/mine more.

No one had that dominant a share of mining for a sustained period of time. I can say this with near 100% certainty, but not quite 100% because various contrived conspiracy theories make it theoretically possible. I can say with absolute 100% certainly that no one had more than 70-75%

Given the significant fraction of all mined coins that changed hands on OTC and the cryptonote exchange in the early days I think it is fair to say that if someone accumulated 400k (around 20 days of full output) it was likely due to buying rather than mining.

Okurkabinladin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 506

Just so you all know. Trading volume of Monero is third now, only Litecoin and Bitcoin have bigger volume. Incredibly bullish.

http://coinmarketcap.com/

Roy Badami

hero member

Activity: 563

Merit: 500

Quote from: rpietila on July 21, 2014, 04:20:40 PM

Quote from: Roy Badami on July 21, 2014, 04:09:55 PM

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 10:37:17 AM

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on July 20, 2014, 10:28:29 AM

Quote from: LAstar on July 20, 2014, 09:49:36 AM

Monero seems to be quite unstable. What's wrong with the price?

Actually, it is remarkably stable since start, no large pumps and dumps along the way. Mean average price rising since may.

What is the total range of XMR trading ever, including all outliers?

I gather it should be about 0.00039 - 0.01110. If so, these are only 28x apart from each other Shocked

For any other coin, it's more. With Bitcoin, the range is 0.001 - 1,236; difference being 1,236,000x. Grin

I'm interested to know your source for 0.001. Lowest price I've seen documented is 0.003 on Bitcoin Market in April/May 2010 (EDIT: which is the earliest data I have. Do you have earlier, Risto?)

roy

Sirius has told in multiple occasions that he sold 5000 (or 5050) bitcoins for $5, making the record for the floor price.

Ah, thank you! I guess I was thinking of price data from exchanges, rather than private transactions.

rpietila

donator

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1036

Quote from: Roy Badami on July 21, 2014, 04:09:55 PM

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 10:37:17 AM

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on July 20, 2014, 10:28:29 AM

Quote from: LAstar on July 20, 2014, 09:49:36 AM

Monero seems to be quite unstable. What's wrong with the price?

Actually, it is remarkably stable since start, no large pumps and dumps along the way. Mean average price rising since may.

What is the total range of XMR trading ever, including all outliers?

I gather it should be about 0.00039 - 0.01110. If so, these are only 28x apart from each other Shocked

For any other coin, it's more. With Bitcoin, the range is 0.001 - 1,236; difference being 1,236,000x. Grin

I'm interested to know your source for 0.001. Lowest price I've seen documented is 0.003 on Bitcoin Market in April/May 2010 (EDIT: which is the earliest data I have. Do you have earlier, Risto?)

roy

Sirius has told in multiple occasions that he sold 5000 (or 5050) bitcoins for $5, making the record for the floor price.

Roy Badami

hero member

Activity: 563

Merit: 500

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 10:37:17 AM

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on July 20, 2014, 10:28:29 AM

Quote from: LAstar on July 20, 2014, 09:49:36 AM

Monero seems to be quite unstable. What's wrong with the price?

Actually, it is remarkably stable since start, no large pumps and dumps along the way. Mean average price rising since may.

What is the total range of XMR trading ever, including all outliers?

I gather it should be about 0.00039 - 0.01110. If so, these are only 28x apart from each other Shocked

For any other coin, it's more. With Bitcoin, the range is 0.001 - 1,236; difference being 1,236,000x. Grin

I'm interested to know your source for 0.001. Lowest price I've seen documented is 0.003 on Bitcoin Market in April/May 2010 (EDIT: which is the earliest data I have. Do you have earlier, Risto?)

roy

luigi1111

legendary

Activity: 1105

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rpietila on July 20, 2014, 07:48:48 AM

top holding: 280,000 XMR

Seems to me you're just a smidgen high; I'd guess just <260k. Grin

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dga on July 21, 2014, 11:23:46 AM

But don't listen to me for advice -- I treat all of crypto as a gigantic fun experiment to learn from, and when I get lucky, make some spare change. I don't have any money invested in it that I can't say goodbye to. Within my high risk, I give myself a bit of "play" money where I figure that if I learn something by losing it, I'm still ahead.

I hate saying goodbye to any money

Topic: [XMR] rpietila Monero Economics thread - page 20. (Read 70064 times)