Thank you, very nice initiative.
We are not working on wallet code at all atm, but on our service platform on top of XQN.
The things we did want to change with wallet/coin is:
Re enable pow, with a cpu friendly algo. (axiom memhash)
Merge mine and use tx fees as pow reward.
Increase tx fees, and include some staking tools like multisend from Presstab and other tools desired by community.
We do have a trusted compiler, but not time to work on those aspects now.
The service platform and its features are more important right now, and also regaining trust so we get more users.
Our service platform will be useless if we do not have users/stakers/traders/community.
About enabling in wallet news feeds with rewards for providing info, this is absolutely something we would want to do.
If you are interested in contributing, this is very appreciated and pm me for communication options.
Happy staking!
IW
I went ahead and made a new lightsplasher fork on github and intend to add a short update that adds a “total” to the selected records from the transaction register. This code comes from presstab in the Hyperstake project I believe. I can make a pull request to the main code branch once I'm done, however, it seems like the illustrious Cedric Profit has lost a bit of interest in maintaining things at this point.
I'm willing to merge any code branches from the community into my branch but I'm not intending to release any binaries at this point.
Moving forward I feel it is in the best interest of the community to have a trusted developer or someone well vested in the coin or other business built on reputation to compile the source code and distribute new releases – do we have a trusted way to make a new release? Some coin communities have experienced problems so I would advise caution.
Additionally, I've thought about trying to open up the news feed and video content page in the wallet to allow the public to post content there and earn tips. There would need to be some way to vote off Spam content and vote up good content. Each address having a minimum value could be eligible to cast a vote, perhaps one vote per address containing at least 1000 XQN. What do you think of this idea in general, any concerns or suggestions?
I'm just throwing this out there without having studied the code much, I'm not sure what can be done or even what the community is interested in doing at this point so I'm open to discussion.