[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 256 blocks solved! - page 80.

Josek8

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

Quote from: hiaxis on October 30, 2022, 01:34:44 AM

Question for you all. I was looking at the solo pool stats and noticed the number of rejected shares versus total shares accepted.

"accepted": 24575964250308, "rejected": 8543041616789,

Is it normal to have such a high ratio of rejected to accepted shares? It's almost 35%.

Just curious...

Good questiong¡¡

I would add that CKPool has been almost two months with an average of 19P more or less without hitting a block, could it be due to the increase of the difficulty in these last months?

I think that 19P is like 190 asics of 100Th/s and it scares me to believe that it takes so many machines to not hit a block in 2 months.

hiaxis

jr. member

Activity: 97

Merit: 5

Question for you all. I was looking at the solo pool stats and noticed the number of rejected shares versus total shares accepted.

"accepted": 24575964250308, "rejected": 8543041616789,

Is it normal to have such a high ratio of rejected to accepted shares? It's almost 35%.

Just curious...

armenma

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Hi, I am attempting to run the setupsoloproxy.sh on ubuntu and ckproxy is missing. I checked the http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/soloproxy and ckproxy is missing from the directory as well. Can someone please help me run the script? Is there a step by step direction I can use? or connect with the author?

Please help! I can send snapshots is the ask in unclear.

Thank you in advance.

willi9974

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 2663

Escrow Service

Quote from: Derter on October 26, 2022, 03:58:56 PM

This is private question. Need direct contact of support.

Than use a PM direkt to CK Grin

Derter

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

This is private question. Need direct contact of support.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: Derter on October 26, 2022, 12:28:24 PM

Hi!
Where get contacts support of this pool?
In IRC not answer.

You are in the support thread. Ask your question.

Derter

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Hi!
Where get contacts support of this pool?
In IRC not answer.

willi9974

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 2663

Escrow Service

Quote from: Josek8 on October 25, 2022, 10:52:27 AM

Quote from: willi9974 on October 25, 2022, 08:40:52 AM

Other OS or set a parameter to transmit more or less data…
It is depending on your client or your setting what you have made.

Best regards,
Willi

Is it important, should I fix it somehow?

Here is all ok, nothing to fix Grin

If you send more bytes per ping, you can check your line and the route how are the testresult if you send more data. That ist more for troubleshooting…
Think it is all ok what I see

Josek8

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

Quote from: willi9974 on October 25, 2022, 08:40:52 AM

Other OS or set a parameter to transmit more or less data…
It is depending on your client or your setting what you have made.

Best regards,
Willi

Is it important, should I fix it somehow?

willi9974

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 2663

Escrow Service

Other OS or set a parameter to transmit more or less data…
It is depending on your client or your setting what you have made.

Best regards,
Willi

Josek8

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

Quote from: -ck on October 24, 2022, 07:17:21 AM

Quote from: Josek8 on October 24, 2022, 07:03:41 AM

Haciendo ping a solo.ckpool.org [51.81.56.15] con 32 bytes de datos:
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=116ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=116ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=115ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=115ms TTL=51

I have this data, which range would be the best to follow in CKPool?

That's fine. Up to 150ms should still be fine.

Why do I see 32 Bytes and the data shown are 64 Bytes?

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4116

Merit: 7849

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: NotFuzzyWarm on October 24, 2022, 07:31:51 PM

One needs to ask: How are these folks trying to connect? Using TOR and/or a VPN where the data is bounced around several long links to different servers before getting to/from the endpoints? Those are insanely long ping times for any direct network connection...

Yeah over 200 = bad

and over 300 = worse

never mind that he had some over 400 and over 500

NotFuzzyWarm

legendary

Activity: 3612

Merit: 2506

Evil beware: We have waffles!

One needs to ask: How are these folks trying to connect? Using TOR and/or a VPN where the data is bounced around several long links to different servers before getting to/from the endpoints? Those are insanely long ping times for any direct network connection...

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: jack1cryptotalk007 on October 24, 2022, 05:03:29 PM

I ping, your server change name to solo4.ckpool.org, 395 ms.
Too slow?

jack1@hp:~$ ping solo.ckpool.org -c 5
PING solo.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=1 ttl=38 time=512 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=2 ttl=38 time=433 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=3 ttl=38 time=355 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=4 ttl=38 time=379 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=5 ttl=38 time=300 ms

--- solo.ckpool.org ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 299.737/395.647/511.561/72.009 ms

Yes definitely too slow. Try solo6.ckpool.org if your network supports IPV6.

jack1cryptotalk007

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 20

I ping, your server change name to solo4.ckpool.org, 395 ms.
Too slow?

jack1@hp:~$ ping solo.ckpool.org -c 5
PING solo.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=1 ttl=38 time=512 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=2 ttl=38 time=433 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=3 ttl=38 time=355 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=4 ttl=38 time=379 ms
64 bytes from solo4.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): icmp_seq=5 ttl=38 time=300 ms

--- solo.ckpool.org ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 299.737/395.647/511.561/72.009 ms

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: Josek8 on October 24, 2022, 07:03:41 AM

Haciendo ping a solo.ckpool.org [51.81.56.15] con 32 bytes de datos:
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=116ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=116ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=115ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=115ms TTL=51

I have this data, which range would be the best to follow in CKPool?

That's fine. Up to 150ms should still be fine.

Josek8

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

Quote from: -ck on October 24, 2022, 06:35:24 AM

Quote from: KudilCumil on October 24, 2022, 06:28:12 AM

on CKPool :

Code:

PING solo.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=0 ttl=51 time=265.554 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=1 ttl=51 time=265.200 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=2 ttl=51 time=265.054 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=3 ttl=51 time=265.302 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=4 ttl=51 time=265.159 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=5 ttl=51 time=265.413 ms

--- solo.ckpool.org ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 265.054/265.280/265.554 ms

hi,.. with ping that big, is it still worth it for me to mine on CKPool?

I'd say that's an excessively high ping time and would advise against it unless you're dead set on mining solo instead of on a regular shared pool.

Haciendo ping a solo.ckpool.org [51.81.56.15] con 32 bytes de datos:
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=116ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=116ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=115ms TTL=51
Respuesta desde 51.81.56.15: bytes=32 tiempo=115ms TTL=51

I have this data, which range would be the best to follow in CKPool?

Thanks in advance

KudilCumil

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: -ck on October 24, 2022, 06:35:24 AM

Quote from: KudilCumil on October 24, 2022, 06:28:12 AM

on CKPool :

Code:

PING solo.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=0 ttl=51 time=265.554 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=1 ttl=51 time=265.200 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=2 ttl=51 time=265.054 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=3 ttl=51 time=265.302 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=4 ttl=51 time=265.159 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=5 ttl=51 time=265.413 ms

--- solo.ckpool.org ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 265.054/265.280/265.554 ms

hi,.. with ping that big, is it still worth it for me to mine on CKPool?

I'd say that's an excessively high ping time and would advise against it unless you're dead set on mining solo instead of on a regular shared pool.

Thank you -CK,..

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: KudilCumil on October 24, 2022, 06:28:12 AM

on CKPool :

Code:

PING solo.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=0 ttl=51 time=265.554 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=1 ttl=51 time=265.200 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=2 ttl=51 time=265.054 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=3 ttl=51 time=265.302 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=4 ttl=51 time=265.159 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=5 ttl=51 time=265.413 ms

--- solo.ckpool.org ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 265.054/265.280/265.554 ms

hi,.. with ping that big, is it still worth it for me to mine on CKPool?

I'd say that's an excessively high ping time and would advise against it unless you're dead set on mining solo instead of on a regular shared pool.

KudilCumil

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

on CKPool :

Code:

PING solo.ckpool.org (51.81.56.15): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=0 ttl=51 time=265.554 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=1 ttl=51 time=265.200 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=2 ttl=51 time=265.054 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=3 ttl=51 time=265.302 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=4 ttl=51 time=265.159 ms
64 bytes from 51.81.56.15: seq=5 ttl=51 time=265.413 ms

--- solo.ckpool.org ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 265.054/265.280/265.554 ms

hi,.. with ping that big, is it still worth it for me to mine on CKPool?
or should i move to ViaBTC? it gave me :

Code:

PING btc.viabtc.io (172.65.24.253): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.65.24.253: seq=0 ttl=53 time=21.761 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.24.253: seq=1 ttl=53 time=21.843 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.24.253: seq=2 ttl=53 time=21.685 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.24.253: seq=3 ttl=53 time=21.343 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.24.253: seq=4 ttl=53 time=21.610 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.24.253: seq=5 ttl=53 time=21.502 ms

--- btc.viabtc.io ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 21.343/21.624/21.843 ms

thank you,..

Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 256 blocks solved! - page 80. (Read 89163 times)