Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 277. (Read 1514780 times)
December 08, 2015, 07:09:11 AM
You remember his wallet key
December 08, 2015, 06:31:45 AM
Congrats to 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC.So christmas is save...
I remember this fella.
He already found a block, 3-4 months ago.
And if remember correct, he had some trouble in life.
So congrats to him.
December 08, 2015, 04:27:07 AM
Congrats to 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC.So christmas is save...
December 07, 2015, 09:19:01 PM
what was the hashrate?
200+ ms ping is it OK CK? or it's too much? will that be an disadvantage?
The hashrate is in my post...200+ ms ping is it OK CK? or it's too much? will that be an disadvantage?
It's not too much. The next real pool in terms of verified block change speed is almost 1 second slower than solo is, and many are far slower.
December 07, 2015, 09:07:03 PM
what was the hashrate?
200+ ms ping is it OK CK? or it's too much? will that be an disadvantage?
200+ ms ping is it OK CK? or it's too much? will that be an disadvantage?
December 07, 2015, 08:49:42 PM
Congrats to 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC
Code:
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.014] Possible block solve diff 196279564100.381348 !
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] Solved and confirmed block 387235 by 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC.104G
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] User 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC:{"hashrate1m": "374T", "hashrate5m": "332T", "hashrate1hr": "74.6T", "hashrate1d": "9.87T", "hashrate7d": "4.13T"}
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] Worker 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC.104G:{"hashrate1m": "372T", "hashrate5m": "330T", "hashrate1hr": "72.8T", "hashrate1d": "6.68T", "hashrate7d": "1.23T"}
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] Solved and confirmed block 387235 by 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC.104G
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] User 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC:{"hashrate1m": "374T", "hashrate5m": "332T", "hashrate1hr": "74.6T", "hashrate1d": "9.87T", "hashrate7d": "4.13T"}
[2015-12-08 01:28:37.355] Worker 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC.104G:{"hashrate1m": "372T", "hashrate5m": "330T", "hashrate1hr": "72.8T", "hashrate1d": "6.68T", "hashrate7d": "1.23T"}
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/0000000000000000059a078c2b399b169001c53862149c2bf1f809d8c5e1f4e6
December 07, 2015, 08:43:58 PM
Congrats to 15X8ziBTCLEQCU2eUwWoQCYqJV7CoJSFoC
December 07, 2015, 01:40:44 AM
I guess we need more group hash rentals to change that then ^_^
December 07, 2015, 12:58:16 AM
December 07, 2015, 12:31:54 AM
You mean there might not be a giant backlog of transactions??? INCONCEIVABLE!!!
anyone know if ck hit a block
December 06, 2015, 10:40:13 AM
You mean there might not be a giant backlog of transactions??? INCONCEIVABLE!!!
December 06, 2015, 08:35:55 AM
It's also worth noting that on this last block solved (386774), solo produced a massive block of 974.8 kB even though there were 4 blocks solved in the 10 minutes previously with only 715.6 kB, 332.7 kB, 126.9 kB and 193.4 kB each.
The recent push with hardware is efficiency - efficiency, efficiency, efficiency; that's the big headline with any new chip or miner that hits the scene. But look at what efficient software can do, too. It maximized the effectiveness of the hardware. Imagine how much more efficient the network would be if every pool took more time to pay this type of attention to their code.
December 06, 2015, 08:17:25 AM
This man hashing at least a day with 1Phs.
So, can we say it is guarantee to solve block with 1Phs/day ?
No. There are no guarantees. With 3.6PH you will solve a block on average every day at current difficulty, but that's on average. If you mine with 3.6PH for one day you have a 37% chance of finding nothing and a 63% chance of finding one or more blocks.So, can we say it is guarantee to solve block with 1Phs/day ?
With 1PH you only have an 18% chance of finding one or more blocks mining for a day.
December 05, 2015, 07:04:59 AM
This man hashing at least a day with 1Phs.
So, can we say it is guarantee to solve block with 1Phs/day ?
No. There are no guarantees. With 3.6PH you will solve a block on average every day at current difficulty, but that's on average. If you mine with 3.6PH for one day you have a 37% chance of finding nothing and a 63% chance of finding one or more blocks.So, can we say it is guarantee to solve block with 1Phs/day ?
With 1PH you only have an 18% chance of finding one or more blocks mining for a day.
December 05, 2015, 06:59:28 AM
This man hashing at least a day with 1Phs.
So, can we say it is guarantee to solve block with 1Phs/day ?
So, can we say it is guarantee to solve block with 1Phs/day ?
December 05, 2015, 06:35:02 AM
Found a typo bug:
https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/b9a1d074d336aaad5650db10c0039c523c055521/src/stratifier.c?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#stratifier.c-2368
hashrate1d -> hashrate1hr
Elbandi
Well spotted thanks. That would affect stats when reloading them after a restart. https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/b9a1d074d336aaad5650db10c0039c523c055521/src/stratifier.c?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#stratifier.c-2368
hashrate1d -> hashrate1hr
Elbandi
December 05, 2015, 06:00:05 AM
Well respect for your eyes! Good Job!
looks like the status page used at the moment on cksolopool does not show that error up.
looks like the status page used at the moment on cksolopool does not show that error up.
December 05, 2015, 05:50:10 AM
Found a typo bug:
https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/b9a1d074d336aaad5650db10c0039c523c055521/src/stratifier.c?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#stratifier.c-2368
hashrate1d -> hashrate1hr
Elbandi
https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/b9a1d074d336aaad5650db10c0039c523c055521/src/stratifier.c?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#stratifier.c-2368
hashrate1d -> hashrate1hr
Elbandi
December 05, 2015, 04:45:15 AM
Congrats to 1G9Y29V8zQ1i62c2ugg4xM566NLTmEabJn for the Block!
---
Yes, as it should be, but all the others just intrested in the money as usal.
Verry good job con!
I wonder on how deep you have to go to optimize that all and how many "free" time you invest.
But there are people whow understand what you'le be doing, for all of us.
---
Code:
and is still the reference for speed for getting block updates out to miners. Transaction spamming doesn't hurt it, and neither SPV mining nor zero transaction blocks are required.
Yes, as it should be, but all the others just intrested in the money as usal.
Verry good job con!
I wonder on how deep you have to go to optimize that all and how many "free" time you invest.
But there are people whow understand what you'le be doing, for all of us.
December 05, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
It's also worth noting that on this last block solved (386774), solo produced a massive block of 974.8 kB even though there were 4 blocks solved in the 10 minutes previously with only 715.6 kB, 332.7 kB, 126.9 kB and 193.4 kB each. Provided the transaction has an appropriate amount of fees, it qualifies as a valid transaction. I do NOT use any blacklists for "censoring" transactions either. The current modifications I've made to this pool are able to do full block verification AND include massive amounts of transactions and is still the reference for speed for getting block updates out to miners. Transaction spamming doesn't hurt it, and neither SPV mining nor zero transaction blocks are required.
Jump to: