Yolodice is one of the site where I play dice game.
Thats my favorite gambling game ever since I learned to gamble online, primedice and yolodice are one of the best for me during my early times as a gambler.
Its sad that they're closing after 4 years of operating but im hoping for their come back soon.
Topic: 🔶 YOLOdice.com 🔶 suspended on 16st Mar 2021 - page 5. (Read 143533 times)
The truth is yolodice team have tried after running the site for four year they are still able to come out to inform users and giving time for fund to be withdraw thanks team I will continue to use bustadice to play from now going forward.
It is just ethical for them to release out those funds before they go rather than on holding those and scamming the amounts which would really be a big problem or wouldnt really be appealing to the masses specially to the players and to the entire community.They wont really be ruining on the reputation that they had built for years
so its just expected to do the right thing.
The truth is yolodice team have tried after running the site for four year they are still able to come out to inform users and giving time for fund to be withdraw thanks team I will continue to use bustadice to play from now going forward.
What do you mean by they have tried for 4 years? IMO they successfully introduced Yolodice to us from scratch, you know before it, we never heard or know about Yolodice. Yolodice is popular because they have speed betting which faster than other gambling site. Doesn't matter which site you will continue as long as it's legit as Yolodice Listen, I'll just have to tell you what I have in mind: I like what JD did - shut down BTC and started their own coin. But I don't think this solved the main problem IMO - whoever admins the site still is responsible for the coins, for the server security, for software etc. If you want to do it right, it's a 24/7 job with alerts waking you up in the middle of night. That's how it is if you want to run a reliable site. It gets better over time as you code matures, you solve most of daily maintenance issues etc.
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
as i said in one of my earlier posts, running the site with only (stakeable?) altcoins might be the best chance to keep the community alive. also your other ideas sound quite fun. i guess going this path will be successful, take your time and do not rush it.
greetz, whore-ray
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
You don't want to keep BTC? Fine but keep some existing coins (maybe give some thought to LN) and if you are to create your own coin do some thorough research about which platform suits you most (Binance chain could be promising)
interesting you say that cause I thought I remember clam going from like .0001 btc to over .01 btc at one point plus staking I mean if you played it out right could have made more than a few bucks
*and yeah LTC got hit super hard
Yeah, the problem is that I bought those CLAMS high. I don't remember the exact numbers but I lost like 70% even considering casino profits. And well, it could have been worse as it has kept on dropping.
But anyway Time has come , just few more days and the History of YoloDice will finally close to an end.
This is why I believe we are in a difficult situation for a regular person to handle and I do not think that people could handle that kind of loss that easily. Ethan of course cut all of that and just closing it, that way we do not have to worry about any of this anyway.
just to be clear. just-dice.com was greatest dice site ever made in crypto history
Listen, I'll just have to tell you what I have in mind: I like what JD did - shut down BTC and started their own coin.
To be clear we didn't start our own coin, we just switched to a coin with a very small market cap.
The point was to massively reduce the value of the bankroll that we had to be responsible for, to make the site closer to a "play money" site than a high-stakes Bitcoin place. It worked well for the most part but some people seemed to think that CLAM (the altcoin we switched to) was a good investment *because* Just-Dice was using it. It wasn't...
It is sad to say good bye to Yolodice. Although I'm not really active playing here since few years back but at least I have a great experience at Yolodice especially when it comes to contest as I won good amount from the past contest. I hope ethan will come back with new bigger project in the future.
Same here , i am not an active Player of YoloDice but i am proud to say that this is the first Dice game/Site that i Played when i learned Crypto gambling , I registered my account back when they are just newly promoted here . because i am not a dice player those time and i only Plays Poker and Blackjack back in the time.
Now that Yolo is coming to end , I think the legacy will remain to all of us who once played in their legit and trust worthy site.
It's just happen that new venture must come because business specially gambling tend not to stay forever but to have some changes.
Lets admit that Dice Nowadays is not that popular gambling activities because there are many games that offers more fun and also excitement .
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
I believe that having ICO is one fun thing that the team of YoloDice will surely enjoy, and also this means that there will no farewell party at all but instead they will just have a New venture in this community .
That sounds much better.
interesting you say that cause I thought I remember clam going from like .0001 btc to over .01 btc at one point plus staking I mean if you played it out right could have made more than a few bucks
*and yeah LTC got hit super hard
Yeah, the problem is that I bought those CLAMS high. I don't remember the exact numbers but I lost like 70% even considering casino profits. And well, it could have been worse as it has kept on dropping.
But anyway Time has come , just few more days and the History of YoloDice will finally close to an end.
interesting you say that cause I thought I remember clam going from like .0001 btc to over .01 btc at one point plus staking I mean if you played it out right could have made more than a few bucks
*and yeah LTC got hit super hard
Yeah, the problem is that I bought those CLAMS high. I don't remember the exact numbers but I lost like 70% even considering casino profits. And well, it could have been worse as it has kept on dropping.
Which coins could be invested in that case?
I remember when Just Dice changed to CLAMS. I was stupid enough to exchange BTC for CLAMS to be able to stay invested. Even if I made some CLAMS, they depreciated so fast that it was one of my worst crypto investments ever.
Investing LTC in Yolodice has been quite bad in part also because of the same issue, LTC depreciating against BTC. So if you can do this using BTC, or at least something like WBTC (if that makes it easier to implement), it would be great.
interesting you say that cause I thought I remember clam going from like .0001 btc to over .01 btc at one point plus staking I mean if you played it out right could have made more than a few bucks
*and yeah LTC got hit super hard
Listen, I'll just have to tell you what I have in mind: I like what JD did - shut down BTC and started their own coin. But I don't think this solved the main problem IMO - whoever admins the site still is responsible for the coins, for the server security, for software etc. If you want to do it right, it's a 24/7 job with alerts waking you up in the middle of night. That's how it is if you want to run a reliable site. It gets better over time as you code matures, you solve most of daily maintenance issues etc.
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
Which coins could be invested in that case?
I remember when Just Dice changed to CLAMS. I was stupid enough to exchange BTC for CLAMS to be able to stay invested. Even if I made some CLAMS, they depreciated so fast that it was one of my worst crypto investments ever.
Investing LTC in Yolodice has been quite bad in part also because of the same issue, LTC depreciating against BTC. So if you can do this using BTC, or at least something like WBTC (if that makes it easier to implement), it would be great.
Listen, I'll just have to tell you what I have in mind: I like what JD did - shut down BTC and started their own coin. But I don't think this solved the main problem IMO - whoever admins the site still is responsible for the coins, for the server security, for software etc. If you want to do it right, it's a 24/7 job with alerts waking you up in the middle of night. That's how it is if you want to run a reliable site. It gets better over time as you code matures, you solve most of daily maintenance issues etc.
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
Just to be clear though ethan CLAM was not created by doog or just-dice
^
CLAM was created by Xploited and Creative. Good catch Blue.
Listen, I'll just have to tell you what I have in mind: I like what JD did - shut down BTC and started their own coin. But I don't think this solved the main problem IMO - whoever admins the site still is responsible for the coins, for the server security, for software etc. If you want to do it right, it's a 24/7 job with alerts waking you up in the middle of night. That's how it is if you want to run a reliable site. It gets better over time as you code matures, you solve most of daily maintenance issues etc.
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
I am thinking about starting a new blockchain with stakeable coins, but at the same time offering investor and player roles similar to dice sites. In addition to staking you could put your coins in the "bankroll". Players on the other hand could issue transactions similar to "bets" that would win or lose, based on verifiable distributed random number generation.
- The game itself would be a part of the blockchain protocol, so there would be no need to keep data centralized.
- The investors would always have control over their coins (no need to deposit them to any site).
- Investors would gain from both staking and providing coins for the bankroll (with game volatility involved).
- The game would be provably fair for both players AND investors (!!!).
- The blockchain would be fully distributed, no central storage or site. Ideally it would not be "owned" by anyone either.
- For the chain to be attractive I believe some social aspects should be implemented too - user accounts, chat, avatars etc.
It's still an early idea. If we decide to follow it, there will be numerous challenges, but hey, it could be really fun!
It's still to early to talk about ICO, but the idea keeps evolving in my mind and I have started exploring some technical aspects already.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Ethan
Just to be clear though ethan CLAM was not created by doog or just-dice
Players were incentivized to wager in volume with the promise of specific daily faucet amounts.
The players have already wagered the volume and therefore completed their end of the bargain.
If the site is closed how do you plan to compensate those players?
The players have already wagered the volume and therefore completed their end of the bargain.
If the site is closed how do you plan to compensate those players?
Interesting to see that the discussion about how yolodice is closing (and ethan probably taking a break before he comes back with something else) turned into how bitcoin core could be good or bad, I mean it is obviously bad which is why we are looking for other improvements, but I am trying to figure out how that topic turned into this topic lol.
Because YoloDice users are paying 0.001680 BTC to withdraw lol...
I hope you didn't think too hard about how the conversation got there. You may hurt yourself.
Maybe this is the third time I feel that I have lost a crypto gambling site in this community that I like, like before about Directbet, Rollin, and now I will really lose Yolodice and maybe there are others but I don't really pay attention to it. These sites are closed at least the same year that Bitcoin will or has gone up to the moon, and that is likely to be something I fear for the future (Bitcoin to the moon scared me to lose more crypto gambling sites 
).
Anyway, I hope Ethan and Scott, and the team involved can come back with other great ideas in the future, I realize decisions like that are tough ones but I'm sure it's all for the good of all.
I wish all the best for all, Thank you for being in this community for a long time and it is wonderful.
Yep you would say that with those bitcoin prizes they wouldn't stop. Last month Lcukybit also stopped. Let's hope there aren't anymore sites stopping in the next monhts.).Anyway, I hope Ethan and Scott, and the team involved can come back with other great ideas in the future, I realize decisions like that are tough ones but I'm sure it's all for the good of all.
I wish all the best for all, Thank you for being in this community for a long time and it is wonderful.
YOLOdice was for as far I know the first site where you could bet even smaller than 0.01% which most sites had.
However the bigger bitcoin became the more responsibility these people had and that is why it was nearly impossible for them to just handle it alone. Which leaves two options either be a huge place with a headquarter and a lot of workers or just decide not to pursue this anymore and since most of them already made a profit and have bitcoins they could simply just come back with something they can do themselves without need of a huge team.
~
A really good statement...
Very nicely written and also completely understandable why you have decided to take this step.
I wish you all the best in your time out. And I am curious with which great project we will see you guys again.
Have a good time...see ya!
Jump to: