is anyone using zhash? zhash was the only pool which came back with 0 Rejected for me.
I am using Zhash for ZEN without issue. I seem to be getting just about what my expected rewards are day to day.
Topic: Z9 list of working pools/Fork updates - page 6. (Read 36863 times)
is anyone using zhash? zhash was the only pool which came back with 0 Rejected for me.
I am using Zhash for ZEN without issue. I seem to be getting just about what my expected rewards are day to day.
is anyone using zhash? zhash was the only pool which came back with 0 Rejected for me.
Hi dear miners 
I'm using Nicehash, but it feels like it's notpaying as much as expected!
can you suggest me a pool with auto switch and paying with Btc ?
I've heard that MPH is not profitable enough now, is it true?
you suggest auto switch pool or concentrating on only one coin?
if it's so, what's the best pool for Z9 mini
tnx
I'm using Nicehash, but it feels like it's notpaying as much as expected!
can you suggest me a pool with auto switch and paying with Btc ?
I've heard that MPH is not profitable enough now, is it true?
you suggest auto switch pool or concentrating on only one coin?
if it's so, what's the best pool for Z9 mini
tnx
You should try flypool or suprnova.
Hi dear miners
I'm using Nicehash, but it feels like it's notpaying as much as expected!
can you suggest me a pool with auto switch and paying with Btc ?
I've heard that MPH is not profitable enough now, is it true?
you suggest auto switch pool or concentrating on only one coin?
if it's so, what's the best pool for Z9 mini
tnx
I'm using Nicehash, but it feels like it's notpaying as much as expected!
can you suggest me a pool with auto switch and paying with Btc ?
I've heard that MPH is not profitable enough now, is it true?
you suggest auto switch pool or concentrating on only one coin?
if it's so, what's the best pool for Z9 mini
tnx
I'm mining on ViaBTC, I upped my freq to 650 and noticed I have a lot less rejects. Right now getting an avg of .077 ZEC/day. Happy with my 1 little mini!!
I have setup my Z9 mini on flypool. Lets see if its accurate.
I will update it. I now have 106.7 H/s. Only coming 9900 H/s to short
No overclocking. But we will see in 2 hours if its accurate
I will update it. I now have 106.7 H/s. Only coming 9900 H/s to short
No overclocking. But we will see in 2 hours if its accurate
See some people talking about MPH for z9 mini.
Was looking for server auto-switch can't find it on website.
Someone ca give it to me want to try test between Zclassic -Zcash and Zen ..
Now got 0.66% more profit with Luxor with zcash then antpool for 24hr.
Was looking for server auto-switch can't find it on website.
Someone ca give it to me want to try test between Zclassic -Zcash and Zen ..
Now got 0.66% more profit with Luxor with zcash then antpool for 24hr.
BCI is forking from equihash
When is it forking from Equihash? No information on their Web siteTomorrow.
BCI is forking from equihash
When is it forking from Equihash? No information on their Web siteTomorrow.
BCI is forking from equihash
When is it forking from Equihash? No information on their Web sitehttps://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-btc-fork-bitfinex-bitcoin-interest-decentralized-savings-join-now-2616641
yeah its not widely publicized, but there
is only 2.15 MSol/s on thier network.
is that 2,100,000 sols? if so thats like only 210 z9s
worth of hash. It should barely affect profiblity.
it was 10 times more than that a few days ago tho, ppl are leaving the network
bc the rewards have stopped i hear for last 100 blocks
BCI is forking from equihash
When is it forking from Equihash? No information on their Web site
BCI is forking from equihash
Are there any multi pools (Autoswitch) ZEC, ZCL, ZEN, CMD, HUSH, BTCP?... All in one shop?
Cheers
Jay
Cheers
Jay
Zergpool has switching on the smaller Equihash coins. Most of them except ZEC and ZEN. Been doing pretty good so far.
I am back on Antpool, been on autoswitch on MPH but i think i it may be better just mining one coin and getting paid every 24 hours..
Are there any multi pools (Autoswitch) ZEC, ZCL, ZEN, CMD, HUSH, BTCP?... All in one shop?
Cheers
Jay
Cheers
Jay
Zergpool has switching on the smaller Equihash coins. Most of them except ZEC and ZEN. Been doing pretty good so far.
ADD TO LIST
Website : www.maupool.comConsole : console.maupool.com
Tested with proof to work with ASICs (but you can do your own research)
https://ibb.co/g6WSEe
https://ibb.co/fE3JLK
https://ibb.co/d3y2fK
I left MPH yesterday and moved to Flypool. When Nanopool opened today, I switched over to them.
I'm not completely sure why my profits were lower on MPH, but I have some suggestions.
Firstly, it seems that MPH systematically overestimates ZEN value compared to whattomine. So, MPH will choose to mine ZEN more often than it "should".
Secondly, there is an extra fee for auto-exchange, that I use. It's only 0.2%, but it's not zero.
Thirdly, as for all switch-mining, in the time it takes to mine, confirm, transfer and exchange, the price of the coin may have fallen.
Lastly, the switch algorithm itself may be a culprit. MPH seems to continuously check which coin is the most profitable, but it won't switch until it finds a block of whatever it is mining at the moment. I think this is done to offset the penalty imposed due to the PPLNS payout scheme. But it has a serious backside. If a coin that MPH mines suddenly gets a big difficulty spike, it won't switch until a block is found, no matter what. I've seen my own miners churning away on a high difficulty ZEC for a couple of hours even when ZEC was at the bottom of the whattomine list.
I'm not completely sure why my profits were lower on MPH, but I have some suggestions.
Firstly, it seems that MPH systematically overestimates ZEN value compared to whattomine. So, MPH will choose to mine ZEN more often than it "should".
Secondly, there is an extra fee for auto-exchange, that I use. It's only 0.2%, but it's not zero.
Thirdly, as for all switch-mining, in the time it takes to mine, confirm, transfer and exchange, the price of the coin may have fallen.
Lastly, the switch algorithm itself may be a culprit. MPH seems to continuously check which coin is the most profitable, but it won't switch until it finds a block of whatever it is mining at the moment. I think this is done to offset the penalty imposed due to the PPLNS payout scheme. But it has a serious backside. If a coin that MPH mines suddenly gets a big difficulty spike, it won't switch until a block is found, no matter what. I've seen my own miners churning away on a high difficulty ZEC for a couple of hours even when ZEC was at the bottom of the whattomine list.
My theory is that the autoswitch pool is so big on MPH it actually "moves the market". As soon as MPH identifies a currency for the autoswitchers to move to, about 10MH+ switch to the new currency and spike difficulty just from their move alone. So the currency from which the autoswitchers moved sees a difficulty drop and those mining that currency still get the benefit.
Just a theory, but I found autoswitch wasn't as good as dedicating to one currency which was consistently overperforming on WTM over the last 24-48hrs.
Same here, when I was trying to track it, the autoswitch returned less. ALot also had to deal with market prices of the alts as well.... it just wasn't as effective as I'd hoped. So i just stuck to 1 currency.
Anyone have a few Z9/minis so they could run MPH-autoswitch vs. something like Prohashing for 48h, at the same time? I've tried to alternate pools... but small differences in pricing on different days always throw things off: it would be best to have 2+ Z9's in parallel to get comparable numbers.
You're not going to get an accurate number, there's variation in each machine that will throw off results. I will say that MPH with auto-conversion has exceeded whattomine highest daily income estimates (of any coin) for me for the past 4-5 days. As with all things, ymmv (and the value of BTC of course plays into the math as well), but I'm overall doing better at this point using it than staying with one coin.
Same here, when I was trying to track it, the autoswitch returned less. ALot also had to deal with market prices of the alts as well.... it just wasn't as effective as I'd hoped. So i just stuck to 1 currency.
Anyone have a few Z9/minis so they could run MPH-autoswitch vs. something like Prohashing for 48h, at the same time? I've tried to alternate pools... but small differences in pricing on different days always throw things off: it would be best to have 2+ Z9's in parallel to get comparable numbers.
Same here, when I was trying to track it, the autoswitch returned less. ALot also had to deal with market prices of the alts as well.... it just wasn't as effective as I'd hoped. So i just stuck to 1 currency.
My theory is that the autoswitch pool is so big on MPH it actually "moves the market". As soon as MPH identifies a currency for the autoswitchers to move to, about 10MH+ switch to the new currency and spike difficulty just from their move alone. So the currency from which the autoswitchers moved sees a difficulty drop and those mining that currency still get the benefit.
Just a theory, but I found autoswitch wasn't as good as dedicating to one currency which was consistently overperforming on WTM over the last 24-48hrs.
I left MPH yesterday and moved to Flypool. When Nanopool opened today, I switched over to them.
I'm not completely sure why my profits were lower on MPH, but I have some suggestions.
Firstly, it seems that MPH systematically overestimates ZEN value compared to whattomine. So, MPH will choose to mine ZEN more often than it "should".
Secondly, there is an extra fee for auto-exchange, that I use. It's only 0.2%, but it's not zero.
Thirdly, as for all switch-mining, in the time it takes to mine, confirm, transfer and exchange, the price of the coin may have fallen.
Lastly, the switch algorithm itself may be a culprit. MPH seems to continuously check which coin is the most profitable, but it won't switch until it finds a block of whatever it is mining at the moment. I think this is done to offset the penalty imposed due to the PPLNS payout scheme. But it has a serious backside. If a coin that MPH mines suddenly gets a big difficulty spike, it won't switch until a block is found, no matter what. I've seen my own miners churning away on a high difficulty ZEC for a couple of hours even when ZEC was at the bottom of the whattomine list.
I'm not completely sure why my profits were lower on MPH, but I have some suggestions.
Firstly, it seems that MPH systematically overestimates ZEN value compared to whattomine. So, MPH will choose to mine ZEN more often than it "should".
Secondly, there is an extra fee for auto-exchange, that I use. It's only 0.2%, but it's not zero.
Thirdly, as for all switch-mining, in the time it takes to mine, confirm, transfer and exchange, the price of the coin may have fallen.
Lastly, the switch algorithm itself may be a culprit. MPH seems to continuously check which coin is the most profitable, but it won't switch until it finds a block of whatever it is mining at the moment. I think this is done to offset the penalty imposed due to the PPLNS payout scheme. But it has a serious backside. If a coin that MPH mines suddenly gets a big difficulty spike, it won't switch until a block is found, no matter what. I've seen my own miners churning away on a high difficulty ZEC for a couple of hours even when ZEC was at the bottom of the whattomine list.
My theory is that the autoswitch pool is so big on MPH it actually "moves the market". As soon as MPH identifies a currency for the autoswitchers to move to, about 10MH+ switch to the new currency and spike difficulty just from their move alone. So the currency from which the autoswitchers moved sees a difficulty drop and those mining that currency still get the benefit.
Just a theory, but I found autoswitch wasn't as good as dedicating to one currency which was consistently overperforming on WTM over the last 24-48hrs.
Jump to: