have anyone try with nvidia new driver 411 yet.
it faster or not?
it faster or not?
i just went here to find an answer about the same ^^
Topic: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner (ver2.6.2 - kawpow RavenCoin). - page 16. (Read 107022 times)
September 22, 2018, 07:59:14 PM
i just went here to find an answer about the same ^^
September 21, 2018, 05:15:07 PM
have anyone try with nvidia new driver 411 yet.
it faster or not?
it faster or not?
September 20, 2018, 08:53:51 PM
Yea, antivirus thinks like 98% of miners are trojans.. Stick to trusted miners..
September 20, 2018, 05:00:49 PM
Hello , anyone alse's antivirus considers that Z-enemy is a trojan?
I use it trough awesome miner and the folders is put on exceptions on avast but it still pops up as trojan.
Check the image below.
https://ibb.co/infCme
all miners antivirus sees as a virus I use it trough awesome miner and the folders is put on exceptions on avast but it still pops up as trojan.
Check the image below.
https://ibb.co/infCme
September 20, 2018, 04:37:48 PM
Hello , anyone alse's antivirus considers that Z-enemy is a trojan?
I use it trough awesome miner and the folders is put on exceptions on avast but it still pops up as trojan.
Check the image below.
https://ibb.co/infCme
I use it trough awesome miner and the folders is put on exceptions on avast but it still pops up as trojan.
Check the image below.
https://ibb.co/infCme
September 20, 2018, 03:33:03 PM
Lol dude, I'm not even going to bother to extend this conversation when you're telling me that by testing for 5 mins on a multi algo like x16r you can tell one is faster than the other. It's just pure ignorance.. Have fun..
No point in this conversation indeed since u obviously can't read or don't understand what's written.
September 19, 2018, 10:24:14 PM
I got a question. How I know witch version to use with my rig. Cuda 9.1 or cuda 9.2?
it goes by which version of nvidia drivers you have... I think the 398+ versions have cuda 9.2
September 19, 2018, 09:44:30 PM
I got a question. How I know witch version to use with my rig. Cuda 9.1 or cuda 9.2?
September 19, 2018, 08:06:48 PM
Of course you would need to test long since some algos are "easy" and bring high hashrates and some algos are "hard" and bring low hashrates. Anything less than 24hours would be worthless because it's multi algo and you need to run the averages over 24hrs.
Like I've said I've been testing z-enemy and t-rex at the same time on different rigs, so sequences were the same... So, no, I didn't have to test it for 24hours, even 5 minutes would have been enough.
Lol dude, I'm not even going to bother to extend this conversation when you're telling me that by testing for 5 mins on a multi algo like x16r you can tell one is faster than the other. It's just pure ignorance.. Have fun..
September 19, 2018, 06:05:41 PM
Of course you would need to test long since some algos are "easy" and bring high hashrates and some algos are "hard" and bring low hashrates. Anything less than 24hours would be worthless because it's multi algo and you need to run the averages over 24hrs.
Like I've said I've been testing z-enemy and t-rex at the same time on different rigs, so sequences were the same... So, no, I didn't have to test it for 24hours, even 5 minutes would have been enough.
September 19, 2018, 05:11:39 PM
Hello, are You ever planning to implement solo mining on Your miner? I'm asking because f. e. my rigs find 4 blocks/week but they mine in one week coins equal to 1 BR so I would like to give a try solo mining ...i have working solo miner but its not optimized and basically gives 2xless mining power 
September 18, 2018, 08:24:59 PM
Didn't have to test long since I can test 1080ti in parallel in both z-enemy with one 1080ti and t-rex with the other 1080ti. With z-enemy I have on avg. 22.620mhs with 1080ti and 17.290mhs with 1080 - these numbers are my personal calculations obviously, I get as high as 50.000mhs and as low as 13.000mhs with 1080ti depending on the sequence.
Of course you would need to test long since some algos are "easy" and bring high hashrates and some algos are "hard" and bring low hashrates. Anything less than 24hours would be worthless because it's multi algo and you need to run the averages over 24hrs.
September 17, 2018, 06:05:11 PM
Try this command for better average readout. --statsavg 6300
For now T-rex is obviously faster, so I'm not using Z-enemy to mine x16r anymore. But once new version arrives I'll test it using this command, thank you!
September 17, 2018, 11:03:39 AM
Didn't have to test long since I can test 1080ti in parallel in both z-enemy with one 1080ti and t-rex with the other 1080ti. With z-enemy I have on avg. 22.620mhs with 1080ti and 17.290mhs with 1080 - these numbers are my personal calculations obviously, I get as high as 50.000mhs and as low as 13.000mhs with 1080ti depending on the sequence.
Try this command for better average readout. --statsavg 6300
September 17, 2018, 10:57:44 AM
Does anyone know if the following ccminer flag works in z-enemy:
-N number
where -N is a flag specifying miner to display hashrate as an average over a number of shares submitted? I tried using -N 3600 (assuming 5 shares submitted per minute this will give me around a 12 hour average hashrate) But, I don't see any confirmation upon startup that this setting is being made, nor do I see any different numbers for hashrate. (I would think over the first couple hours hashrate would be a tiny # as shares build up).
Any thoughts?
This works great. I have mine set to --statsavg 6300 for even more accurate average hashrate readout. -N number
where -N is a flag specifying miner to display hashrate as an average over a number of shares submitted? I tried using -N 3600 (assuming 5 shares submitted per minute this will give me around a 12 hour average hashrate) But, I don't see any confirmation upon startup that this setting is being made, nor do I see any different numbers for hashrate. (I would think over the first couple hours hashrate would be a tiny # as shares build up).
Any thoughts?
September 16, 2018, 03:15:40 PM
I run your miner on HiveOS, mine x16r. 1080 ti, no OC, Power Limit 100%
When I run on 6 GPU, everything is fine. But when running on 12 GPU:
root @ miner8: ~ # uptime
01:26:25 up 36 min, 3 users, load average: 17.54, 15.16, 15.51
When I run on 6 GPU, everything is fine. But when running on 12 GPU:
root @ miner8: ~ # uptime
01:26:25 up 36 min, 3 users, load average: 17.54, 15.16, 15.51
what is the version you use of the miner and cuda ?
September 16, 2018, 07:23:20 AM
which gpu shares incorrectly, does not show.
What I want to do is share the erroneous gpu.
For example:
GPU 1: Rejected share
GPU 2: Found share
What I want to do is share the erroneous gpu.
For example:
GPU 1: Rejected share
GPU 2: Found share
September 15, 2018, 08:32:05 PM
any one can get working Cuda 9.2 version in linux ?
i have ubuntu 16 , cuda 9.2 and the lastest linux nvidia drivers.
pls help
i have ubuntu 16 , cuda 9.2 and the lastest linux nvidia drivers.
pls help
September 15, 2018, 04:29:31 PM
Didn't have to test long since I can test 1080ti in parallel in both z-enemy with one 1080ti and t-rex with the other 1080ti. With z-enemy I have on avg. 22.620mhs with 1080ti and 17.290mhs with 1080 - these numbers are my personal calculations obviously, I get as high as 50.000mhs and as low as 13.000mhs with 1080ti depending on the sequence.
September 15, 2018, 04:06:29 PM
Quote
Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...
Have just tested 32vs64 bit on 1080ti's - no difference noticed, niether between 1.19 and 1.20. T-rex miner on the other hand now at least 15% faster in x16r, but way slower in lyra2z.
What is your hashrate per 1080ti with z-enemy 1.20 and with t-rex 0.6.5? And for how long you have conducted the test?
Jump to: