Pages:
Author

Topic: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner (ver2.6.2 - kawpow RavenCoin). - page 17. (Read 107049 times)

jr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
Quote
Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...

Have just tested 32vs64 bit on 1080ti's - no difference noticed, niether between 1.19 and 1.20. T-rex miner on the other hand now at least 15% faster in x16r, but way slower in lyra2z.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

....

New versions appear faster than they could be tested  Cheesy
Will try x16r and bitcore algo for the next several days
Test config is the same: 6xGTX1080ti, Win10 x64. There is only one condition: power limit should not exceed 230W per GPU for me (PSU limitation)

Yes Smiley lol
And thanks for your  tests btw Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

....

New versions appear faster than they could be tested  Cheesy
Will try x16r and bitcore algo for the next several days
Test config is the same: 6xGTX1080ti, Win10 x64. There is only one condition: power limit should not exceed 230W per GPU for me (PSU limitation)
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 27
http://radio.r41.ru

Dont use these links, They're probably a virus! Use the official links from post #1 only.
if it was a virus enemy would not have placed my links on he discordapp channel. compare the hash of the file and then write that virus.

changed link
http://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.20-cuda90.tar.gz
http://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.20-cuda91.tar.gz
http://radio.r41.ru/z-enemy-1.20-cuda92.tar.gz
jr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 2

Dont use these links, They're probably a virus! Use the official links from post #1 only.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Links fixed, sorry . Check #1 page .
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers  (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx 

- Major performance improvements: 5-10% in various algos
- Bitcoin Diamond: Support for the new famous top algorithm at high speed, 20-30% higher than the current ones.

Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...

Enjoy Wink

Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!lawhgIxB!Bog_u57-DE8vSnbEUM9Y05CcOXIl7E24TYJ-ATchrz0
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!BKpl0ApZ!LjeTT9h_opVXqBc2NN8f2tLRPYh96VFVIujoj2eLAOs

Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!FfpSUIpD!dKYy-q-Ip3qtooBpjZUNLiYbgHMjwhQw91bqK04Abqw
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!UGojkSaS!2lOUTgBKosbCu8-dnRQcR1QdCnTToEozUKd-k83rmbI

Linux:
(HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!wCJDSKyZ!59YWZTWSo7-7_S5aJZ48HNh0IGpc6NkWx1qbYPqCUA0
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!wCAXXaIJ!8aTmQYSQokfuN5ki44BbzkEtFRaMPDvAotdSDEgtsZM
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!MPQlxQBA!tSyq26l4trQiE1AXO8lA9nITnQKuiJbdFJ2McOgxjyc


It would be convenient if the link was such a plan:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/awesomeminer-download/z-enemy.1-19-cuda9.1_x64.zip

Could be very quickly to introduce awesomeminer and from anger n all machine

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Z-ENEMY VER 1.20 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers  (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx  

- Major performance improvements: 5-10% in various algos
- Bitcoin Diamond: Support for the new famous top algorithm at high speed, 20-30% higher than the current ones.

Same as with previous release, 32 bit version performs faster in some algos (x16/x17 etc) ...

Enjoy Wink

Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!lawhgIxB!Bog_u57-DE8vSnbEUM9Y05CcOXIl7E24TYJ-ATchrz0
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!BKpl0ApZ!LjeTT9h_opVXqBc2NN8f2tLRPYh96VFVIujoj2eLAOs

Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!FfpSUIpD!dKYy-q-Ip3qtooBpjZUNLiYbgHMjwhQw91bqK04Abqw
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!haJB2SIK!CGQ9b_q2wSuU62w0lxuI8Vl7Ai9m75eQ2bRt6PbnOmI

Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!wCJDSKyZ!59YWZTWSo7-7_S5aJZ48HNh0IGpc6NkWx1qbYPqCUA0
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!wCAXXaIJ!8aTmQYSQokfuN5ki44BbzkEtFRaMPDvAotdSDEgtsZM
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!MPQlxQBA!tSyq26l4trQiE1AXO8lA9nITnQKuiJbdFJ2McOgxjyc
sr. member
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
...

Thanks!
I'm testing x16r algo. In the miner I see about 5-10% increase of hashrate compared with v1.18. Power consumtption is practically the same. After 24 hours I'll check the hashrate at pool. Hope will see the same improvement

Unfortunately I can't estimate the improvements of new version on pool statistic due to emergency power loss at my rigs for several hours. Will test another day
P.S. I use Win64 Cuda9.2 version

Well after 3 day test I got the following results for my 6x1080ti rig (OC, DV) Win x64 x16r algo
v1.18 ~ 170 Mh/s (48h average on pool)
v1.19 ~ 180 Mh/s (48h average on pool)
Power consumption about 220-230W per GPU

But payment amount is less than WTM predict about 15%. Maybe it's due to pool luck or smth else...
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?

The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL (  250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36

ver 1.19 x32

X16R&S :  ~ up to 27 MH/s
X17:  ~  28 MH/s
Bitcore:  ~  47,5 MH/s

Z-enemy Test Discord:
https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra



hex algo  32bit or 64bit is faster?

For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ...


thank for info
member
Activity: 312
Merit: 10
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?

The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL (  250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36

ver 1.19 x32

X16R&S :  ~ up to 27 MH/s
X17:  ~  28 MH/s
Bitcore:  ~  47,5 MH/s

Z-enemy Test Discord:
https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra



hex algo  32bit or 64bit is faster?

For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ...

any plan add merit algo? https://github.com/meritlabs/merit
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?

The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL (  250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36

ver 1.19 x32

X16R&S :  ~ up to 27 MH/s
X17:  ~  28 MH/s
Bitcore:  ~  47,5 MH/s

Z-enemy Test Discord:
https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra



hex algo  32bit or 64bit is faster?

For hex ( XDNA), high intensity is more important, for example 24 and the x64 version is more stable on 24 ...
sr. member
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
...

Thanks!
I'm testing x16r algo. In the miner I see about 5-10% increase of hashrate compared with v1.18. Power consumtption is practically the same. After 24 hours I'll check the hashrate at pool. Hope will see the same improvement

Unfortunately I can't estimate the improvements of new version on pool statistic due to emergency power loss at my rigs for several hours. Will test another day
P.S. I use Win64 Cuda9.2 version
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Pls Enemy fix linux version of cuda 9.2.

Code:
mining@mining-ntc:~/mineros/enemy$ ./z-enemy
[ERROR  ] 18/09/12 12:54:19 Unable to query number of CUDA devices!


this is the output of nvidia-smi

Code:
Wed Sep 12 13:01:09 2018       
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.77                 Driver Version: 390.77                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 63%   73C    P2   185W / 190W |    282MiB / 11177MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 62%   73C    P2   190W / 190W |    241MiB / 11178MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:04:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 53%   72C    P2   172W / 190W |    241MiB / 11178MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
                                                                               
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
|  GPU       PID   Type   Process name                             Usage      |
|=============================================================================|
|    0       884      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                            30MiB |
|    0      1479      G   compiz                                        17MiB |
|    0     25953      C   ./z-enemy                                    223MiB |
|    1       884      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
|    1     25953      C   ./z-enemy                                    223MiB |
|    2       884      G   /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg                             5MiB |
|    2     25953      C   ./z-enemy                                    223MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+



Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?

The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL (  250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36

ver 1.19 x32

X16R&S :  ~ up to 27 MH/s
X17:  ~  28 MH/s
Bitcore:  ~  47,5 MH/s

Z-enemy Test Discord:
https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra

full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132
please add progPow
jr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 5
Hi all. On my system both x16 little faster on 32bit version. win7 64, 398 driver, 1060 cards, z-enemy 1.19.
Almost 9Mh/1060
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?

The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL (  250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36

ver 1.19 x32

X16R&S :  ~ up to 27 MH/s
X17:  ~  28 MH/s
Bitcore:  ~  47,5 MH/s

Z-enemy Test Discord:
https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra



hex algo  32bit or 64bit is faster?
jr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
Haven't noticed major difference on 1080 and 1080ti @ x16r in hashrate in v1.19, well, mb 1-2%. Power draw is more stable though, less spiky, so to say.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?

The tests are just beginning : For 1080Ti 100 % PL (  250-270W) , CC +130 ( ~1900MHz), mem 0 or -512, drivers 398,36

ver 1.19 x32

X16R&S :  ~ up to 27 MH/s
X17:  ~  28 MH/s
Bitcore:  ~  47,5 MH/s

Z-enemy Test Discord:
https://discord.gg/JTZm3ra
jr. member
Activity: 74
Merit: 1
Z-ENEMY VER 1.19 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

- Major performance improvements: 5-7% in various algos  (x16 ,x17 , bitcore, c11 , hex , etc ..)

Any benchmark with numbers ?
What do you get guys ?
Pages:
Jump to: