Pages:
Author

Topic: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner (ver2.6.2 - kawpow RavenCoin). - page 19. (Read 107046 times)

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Hello,

I'm running the miner with GTX1080Ti, GTX1080 and GTX1070 GPU on Nicehash but I get all share rejected, with T-rex there are no problem, do you know why ?

the cmd that i run is:

z-enemy -a x16s -o stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366 -u xxxxxxxxxxxxx -p x -i 20


z-enemy -a x16s -o stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366 -u xxxxxxxxxxxxx -p x -i 20

Check it ...
full member
Activity: 279
Merit: 100
Hello,

I'm running the miner with GTX1080Ti, GTX1080 and GTX1070 GPU on Nicehash but I get all share rejected, with T-rex there are no problem, do you know why ?

the cmd that i run is:

z-enemy -a x16s -o stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366 -u xxxxxxxxxxxxx -p x -i 20

this is the output:

[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 Dev fee is 1.0%
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 MAIN POOL----------------------------------------------
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 URL : stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 USER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 PASS: x
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 -------------------------------------------------------
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 FAILOVER POOLs-----------------------------------------
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 NONE
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 -------------------------------------------------------
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 Starting on stratum+tcp://x16r.eu.nicehash.com:3366
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 GPU monitoring enabled (NVML).
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 Mining 'x16s' with 6 threads.
[X16    ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 Hashorder algorithm legend: Slow Medium Fast
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:00 New difficulty: 8 (0.03125)
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:00 Block 347724, difficulty 30787.606
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:01 GPU#0: Intensity set to 20
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:01 GPU#1: Intensity set to 20
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:01 GPU#3: Intensity set to 20
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:01 GPU#2: Intensity set to 20
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:01 GPU#4: Intensity set to 20
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:01 GPU#5: Intensity set to 20
[X16    ] 18/09/05 10:12:04 Seq: LufWrlShaKckCubEchBmwJh5GroBlkSkeShvSmdHamFugShb
[X16    ] 18/09/05 10:12:04 Raw: 6EF47A1320589BCD
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:13 Shares: 1 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.515, 43.96MH/s, 50ms - Rejected
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:30 GPU#3: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 11.78MH/s
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:31 GPU#0: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 18.42MH/s
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:31 GPU#5: GeForce GTX 1070, 10.92MH/s
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:32 GPU#4: Zotac GTX 1070, 12.74MH/s
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:36 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 11.93MH/s
[INFO   ] 18/09/05 10:12:36 GPU#1: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 14.80MH/s
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Shares: 2 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.196, 63.85MH/s, 3ms - Rejected
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Shares: 3 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.262, 63.85MH/s, 5ms - Rejected
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Shares: 4 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.053, 63.85MH/s, 5ms - Rejected
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Shares: 5 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.057, 63.85MH/s, 6ms - Rejected
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Shares: 6 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.052, 63.85MH/s, 6ms - Rejected
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
[NOTICE ] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Shares: 7 (A:0.00%, R:100.00%), Diff:0.032, 63.85MH/s, 6ms - Rejected
[WARNING] 18/09/05 10:12:45 Reject reason: Share above target.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
apt-get install libcurl3


Not a solution, because other components of ubuntu 18 depend on libcurl4 which get's uninstalled if you install libcurl3. Internet is full of these reports for various packages. Anyway i found another solution.
Get libcurl.so.3 from the package and

LD_PRELOAD=libcurl.so.3 ./z-enemy.....
jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
MWEdFS1Fkmq6nA5Zz6QsbULXCC15bv1qR4
Z-ENEMY VER 1.18 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers  (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx  

Greetings! We're releasing an updated version of our mining software with some bugfixes and other changes:

- Major performance improvements: 10-15% for Xevan (+ fixed reduced hashrate issue from 1.17)
- Minor performance improvements for other algos
- Stability improvements for XDNA

Have fun !

Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!FepBXYLB!1g2VFLbSKC_QgM2v0zYKBKt2LLAH7lzjmlCfjWh2L-U
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!9WoRxAzQ!H7TgBUjZPsliIkuDINbWuTsJOZGcoOw5pbD-uVGQ0dw

Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!tDphnCxY!rbOxY30znj-BBAsy-F2vWGbzBd9_MQHgb7Bj1CkK42w
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!NS43EQBb!hDfP2I2Kz-aSQX5GX--AkHNzRf0cg7Wr_RwZDoi6F8c

Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!dLwhQALC!7pWrM52SRTk7tkZw10Od0Lrg4usTWLjwt-LRSokBsXs
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!lCwnzCpL!xffKYj4V8POHBY4uYocKcEg0lacIX_t9VI3enAC_NWM
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!hCpDQKRK!QYn3yJU3C9hoam-8gHLjLGHV1VBfJbEgBUz2aZISlMU

There's a chance that your newest update is more stable on my system. I also changed my Afterburner settings to kernel mode which may have been what helped me. Or- lastly, maybe it just hasn't been running long enough yet to have crashed.

Seems more stable so far though.... thx
jr. member
Activity: 74
Merit: 1
- Major performance improvements: 10-15% for Xevan (+ fixed reduced hashrate issue from 1.17)

Does anyone know any good xevan coin to mine though ?
jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
MWEdFS1Fkmq6nA5Zz6QsbULXCC15bv1qR4
Really hoping this new version fixes my issue mining HEX!

Thanks!
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
Z-ENEMY VER 1.18 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)

IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers  (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx 

Greetings! We're releasing an updated version of our mining software with some bugfixes and other changes:

- Major performance improvements: 10-15% for Xevan (+ fixed reduced hashrate issue from 1.17)
- Minor performance improvements for other algos
- Stability improvements for XDNA

Have fun !

Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!FepBXYLB!1g2VFLbSKC_QgM2v0zYKBKt2LLAH7lzjmlCfjWh2L-U
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!9WoRxAzQ!H7TgBUjZPsliIkuDINbWuTsJOZGcoOw5pbD-uVGQ0dw

Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!tDphnCxY!rbOxY30znj-BBAsy-F2vWGbzBd9_MQHgb7Bj1CkK42w
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!NS43EQBb!hDfP2I2Kz-aSQX5GX--AkHNzRf0cg7Wr_RwZDoi6F8c

Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!dLwhQALC!7pWrM52SRTk7tkZw10Od0Lrg4usTWLjwt-LRSokBsXs
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!lCwnzCpL!xffKYj4V8POHBY4uYocKcEg0lacIX_t9VI3enAC_NWM
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!hCpDQKRK!QYn3yJU3C9hoam-8gHLjLGHV1VBfJbEgBUz2aZISlMU
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
i so confuse  ver 1.16 avg antivirus not block but why ver 1.17 avg block it?

Does it matter? Just add it to exclusions.

im add it in to exclusions but when launch it del file anyway.

that why i go to shut down avg LOL
jr. member
Activity: 230
Merit: 1
GPU#0 EVGA GTX 1070 >>> an illegal memory access was encountered
Running Windows 10 and V1.17 with I22
Power limit 80
Core clock +140
Core memory -502

Anyone else having this issue?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
apt-get install libcurl3
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Can you please recompile on ubuntu18, because it does not work currently.

./z-enemy: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl.so.4: version `CURL_OPENSSL_3' not found (required by ./z-enemy)
copper member
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Does anyone know if the following ccminer flag works in z-enemy:

-N number

where -N is a flag specifying miner to display hashrate as an average over a number of shares submitted? I tried using -N 3600 (assuming 5 shares submitted per minute this will give me around a 12 hour average hashrate) But, I don't see any confirmation upon startup that this setting is being made, nor do I see any different numbers for hashrate. (I would think over the first couple hours hashrate would be a tiny # as shares build up).

Any thoughts?
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
It's probably a confusion between bitcore and timetravel... I think bitcore (timetravel10) gets around 33mh/s..
jr. member
Activity: 74
Merit: 1
Hey Smiley i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/

How come you get 52 mh/s on the timetravel algo ?
What's the problem? 50Mh/s are achieved at PL65 and no OC. With 100/500 52 is not a problem.

Well, out of 10 people we all get 32-34  Undecided
jr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
i so confuse  ver 1.16 avg antivirus not block but why ver 1.17 avg block it?

Does it matter? Just add it to exclusions.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
i so confuse  ver 1.16 avg antivirus not block but why ver 1.17 avg block it?
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
Probably a silly question but is the timetravel algo on Z-enemy miner the same as timetravel10? I dont get why everyone needs to have different names for the same algo..
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
is this miner available with nvidia 396. driver on ubuntu?

there is no 398. ubuntu nvidia driver.

maybe you wait until nvidia release new driver
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
Hey Smiley i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/

How come you get 52 mh/s on the timetravel algo ?
What's the problem? 50Mh/s are achieved at PL65 and no OC. With 100/500 52 is not a problem.
jr. member
Activity: 74
Merit: 1
Hey Smiley i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/

How come you get 52 mh/s on the timetravel algo ?
Pages:
Jump to: