Is this still happening? Cause I'm still crashing every so often with the blue screen of death. I have to actually fuck with my power supply to get the computer back on so it may not be an issue with your miner but X16R was working just fine on 1.16... tried HEX and having tons of issues...
I don't insta-crash anymore trying to mine HEX with my 1070Ti GTX after I turned down intensity to 21 (I'd turned it up to 22-23 as recommended for HEX, but it insta-crashes...)
I also turned back my overclock significantly because it's crashing every few hours.
Nothing seems to be fixing the issue and I still can't use intensity higher than 21 or it will insta-crash.
I have fully updated drivers and Cuda 9.2
Topic: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner (ver2.6.2 - kawpow RavenCoin). - page 20. (Read 107049 times)
September 01, 2018, 11:40:30 AM
September 01, 2018, 12:42:05 AM
It's weird but 1.16 and 1.17 receive different jobs from nicehash on x16r, how is that possible? When they start job's sequence is the same and 1.17 is 10%+ faster, but next job's sequence 1.17 gets may have move difficult algos so 1.16 gets ahead in speed...
Version 1.16 does appear to be much better on nicehash compared to version 1.17. I'm curious what they changed that would cause this.
August 31, 2018, 07:21:50 AM
Could anyone help me figure out why my PC crashes and I get a blue screen whenever I try to mine HEX using 1.17 ?
x16r works fine but hex insta-crashes my PC
gonna try a driver reinstall but assuming that doesn't work?
x16r works fine but hex insta-crashes my PC
gonna try a driver reinstall but assuming that doesn't work?
August 29, 2018, 10:14:37 PM
Recently I created: https://ravencoinhashrate.space/index.php and this miner was included on mining software list: https://ravencoinhashrate.space/miningSoftware.php
For those interested on sharing benchmarks, this is website's thread with full details: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44795963
For those interested on sharing benchmarks, this is website's thread with full details: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44795963
August 28, 2018, 08:55:02 AM
Is it possible to just mine skein or something? It's one of the X16R component algos, but I dunno if I can run z-enemy on just skein.
August 26, 2018, 09:41:30 PM
Anyone know what this means?
Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 41 : unspecified launch failure.
Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 41 : unspecified launch failure.
Try a lower intensity. On the command line put --intensity=19 and see if it persists.
August 26, 2018, 04:18:54 PM
Hey 
i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/
i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/Excellent job on the review my man, I have to say, I don't get why Devs never have a cover sheet of the algos and hashrates. I guess it's because they don't want to be compared to others unfavorably but my god what a hassle to get the stats you need for your cards. I commend you on putting this review together and providing such a high level of detail. Good job..
Thank you very much!
maybe they want the users to post their results for each algo, i also don't get it why there is not excel file nicely done for each algo with different gpus and also clock recommendation, will be soo much easier for people who wants to use the miner.. anyway i don't mind to do it even if it takes around 3-4 days Check your numbers again, from a quick glance i can see you have errors in hashrate for sonoa and bitcore.
August 24, 2018, 01:54:32 PM
Hey i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/
i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/Excellent job on the review my man, I have to say, I don't get why Devs never have a cover sheet of the algos and hashrates. I guess it's because they don't want to be compared to others unfavorably but my god what a hassle to get the stats you need for your cards. I commend you on putting this review together and providing such a high level of detail. Good job..
Thank you very much!
maybe they want the users to post their results for each algo, i also don't get it why there is not excel file nicely done for each algo with different gpus and also clock recommendation, will be soo much easier for people who wants to use the miner.. anyway i don't mind to do it even if it takes around 3-4 days August 24, 2018, 12:05:09 PM
Hey i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/
i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/Excellent job on the review my man, I have to say, I don't get why Devs never have a cover sheet of the algos and hashrates. I guess it's because they don't want to be compared to others unfavorably but my god what a hassle to get the stats you need for your cards. I commend you on putting this review together and providing such a high level of detail. Good job..
August 23, 2018, 03:21:23 PM
Hey i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/
i just published my review and benchmarks for z-enemy nvidia gpu miner, the results can be found here https://1stminingrig.com/z-enemy-1-16-nvidia-miner-review-and-benchmarks/ August 23, 2018, 03:04:50 PM
Hey Enemy.
Could you please try to implement hash-rate history in the miner so it can shows average speed for the last 5 min , 15 mins , 60 mins. I am talking for x16r :]
Could you please try to implement hash-rate history in the miner so it can shows average speed for the last 5 min , 15 mins , 60 mins. I am talking for x16r :]
good idea
August 23, 2018, 01:43:50 PM
Hey Enemy.
Could you please try to implement hash-rate history in the miner so it can shows average speed for the last 5 min , 15 mins , 60 mins. I am talking for x16r :]
Could you please try to implement hash-rate history in the miner so it can shows average speed for the last 5 min , 15 mins , 60 mins. I am talking for x16r :]
August 23, 2018, 05:16:41 AM
It's weird but 1.16 and 1.17 receive different jobs from nicehash on x16r, how is that possible? When they start job's sequence is the same and 1.17 is 10%+ faster, but next job's sequence 1.17 gets may have move difficult algos so 1.16 gets ahead in speed...
August 22, 2018, 01:33:17 AM
is this miner available with nvidia 396. driver on ubuntu?
there is no 398. ubuntu nvidia driver.
there is no 398. ubuntu nvidia driver.
August 21, 2018, 01:42:46 PM
We’re getting reports of bugged xevan, please use 1.16 while we investigate and fix it.
August 21, 2018, 11:59:54 AM
Z-ENEMY VER 1.17 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx
Greetings, fellow miners! We're releasing an updated version of our mining software with some speed inside:
- Major performance improvements: 5-10% for X16R & X16S, XDNA (hex), x17, Bitcore(BTX), c11, Sonoa, Renesis, Aergo
- Lower end cards like 1050/1060 will see additional few % (yes, a bonus)
- The miner no longer depends on memory, it allows to run memory clock at +0 or -500 MHz without performance loss.
Happy mining!
Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!hbQQyIBD!IAvlCaKdjtZtvYx0IRLdLWoYHJIPHm2HC0yltgytq30
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!xeBC1QKa!9xqhC51iMUIZ4cSw_MkZUDfPXeqT5XMFuOvoWPkCLgk
Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!cOZmTI5S!o9jzJeSTAeKxuX7a-MXgUZja_PnuRBubdCWd_pouQRU
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!caZWnCIK!bNEiavwcSUPnAFev4s4cU1gtzUa5HqiGssaPThPJWy8
Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!xHQUxAzZ!rLlge4ZPqkaescfUHoZmAGqS_zqjuIty6aOao0Y__54
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!ZPZETQBR!OB7TkaPVJB4NBlz_mXM80ToITxjb7Us6158KN8ilqnY
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!xfI2nawC!Wx_oQbMU3veo_rjUkmNliiaizzGGIGEYbVJboLIL6sQ
August 21, 2018, 08:32:47 AM
Z-ENEMY VER 1.17 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx
Greetings, fellow miners! We're releasing an updated version of our mining software with some speed inside:
- Major performance improvements: 5-10% for X16R & X16S, XDNA (hex), x17, Bitcore(BTX), c11, Sonoa, Renesis, Aergo
- Lower end cards like 1050/1060 will see additional few % (yes, a bonus)
- The miner no longer depends on memory, it allows to run memory clock at +0 or -500 MHz without performance loss.
Happy mining!
Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!hbQQyIBD!IAvlCaKdjtZtvYx0IRLdLWoYHJIPHm2HC0yltgytq30
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!xeBC1QKa!9xqhC51iMUIZ4cSw_MkZUDfPXeqT5XMFuOvoWPkCLgk
Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!cOZmTI5S!o9jzJeSTAeKxuX7a-MXgUZja_PnuRBubdCWd_pouQRU
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!caZWnCIK!bNEiavwcSUPnAFev4s4cU1gtzUa5HqiGssaPThPJWy8
Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!xHQUxAzZ!rLlge4ZPqkaescfUHoZmAGqS_zqjuIty6aOao0Y__54
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!ZPZETQBR!OB7TkaPVJB4NBlz_mXM80ToITxjb7Us6158KN8ilqnY
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!xfI2nawC!Wx_oQbMU3veo_rjUkmNliiaizzGGIGEYbVJboLIL6sQ
Great, thank you! No improvement to Xevan? I thought I had read Xevan is based on X17, but I don't know much about this stuff.
August 21, 2018, 06:53:35 AM
Z-ENEMY VER 1.17 (PUBLIC) From: Dk & Enemy (z-enemy)
IMPORTANT:
For maximum performance make sure you have latest drivers (ver. 398+)
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx
Greetings, fellow miners! We're releasing an updated version of our mining software with some speed inside:
- Major performance improvements: 5-10% for X16R & X16S, XDNA (hex), x17, Bitcore(BTX), c11, Sonoa, Renesis, Aergo
- Lower end cards like 1050/1060 will see additional few % (yes, a bonus)
- The miner no longer depends on memory, it allows to run memory clock at +0 or -500 MHz without performance loss.
Happy mining!
Windows :
Cuda 9.1 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!hbQQyIBD!IAvlCaKdjtZtvYx0IRLdLWoYHJIPHm2HC0yltgytq30
Cuda 9.1 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!xeBC1QKa!9xqhC51iMUIZ4cSw_MkZUDfPXeqT5XMFuOvoWPkCLgk
Cuda 9.2 x32 : https://mega.nz/#!cOZmTI5S!o9jzJeSTAeKxuX7a-MXgUZja_PnuRBubdCWd_pouQRU
Cuda 9.2 x64 : https://mega.nz/#!caZWnCIK!bNEiavwcSUPnAFev4s4cU1gtzUa5HqiGssaPThPJWy8
Linux: (HiveOS, PiMP OS , EthOS & Ubuntu)
Cuda 9.0 : https://mega.nz/#!xHQUxAzZ!rLlge4ZPqkaescfUHoZmAGqS_zqjuIty6aOao0Y__54
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!ZPZETQBR!OB7TkaPVJB4NBlz_mXM80ToITxjb7Us6158KN8ilqnY
Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!xfI2nawC!Wx_oQbMU3veo_rjUkmNliiaizzGGIGEYbVJboLIL6sQ
August 20, 2018, 07:49:12 AM
The latest version 1.16 of the miner works very stable!
I can say that I noticed an increase in my hashrate,
so I'd like to thank the developer for his work and that the most important thing is that he always updates the miner without bugs!
I can say that I noticed an increase in my hashrate,
so I'd like to thank the developer for his work and that the most important thing is that he always updates the miner without bugs!
August 19, 2018, 10:10:42 AM
Suggestion / feature request
Please add --benchmark parameter.
E.g. for X16r it would benchmark each of the 16 sub-algorithms n times and then report the average hash rate.
In theory this will produce the most accurate hash rate average because over time each sub-algorithm would be run equally often.
Any thoughts?
Please add --benchmark parameter.
E.g. for X16r it would benchmark each of the 16 sub-algorithms n times and then report the average hash rate.
In theory this will produce the most accurate hash rate average because over time each sub-algorithm would be run equally often.
Any thoughts?
Most kernels don't have the same timings if they are first (or last). There is also some kernel sequences that reduce timings ("imported" from ccminer X17).
All those optimisation tricks make benchmark inaccurate for X16x
Jump to: