Topic: 😬😬😬 - page 3. (Read 2967 times)

You refused to read the reference on my first feedback and you're known to edit your posts (and you did edit the OP of this thread many times) so I added an explanation what "shady shit" you had engaged in, particularly in the context of your earlier suggestions that scammers should be able to buy their way out of red trust.

What you are saying is that I should always agree with DT members otherwise I could get tagged by any of them at any given time. that is per-definition bullshit, pardon my language.
Suchmoon first tagged me with a bullshit excuse, that is a personal use of his DT power, in his first tag on me there is no mention of
That could only mean that he used his DT power as a personal tool of bullying, then he tagged me the second time, now tell me, why should I be called a scammer if I have asked for money in exchange for my time? if I'm not a lawyer, who made him a judge? whoever made him a judge should also care about his actions.

Now this one from marlboroza:


Why would he care if I'm spreading lies and trolling? who is he to damage my reputation and paint me red by default? where are the lies and trolling? moreover, you should report me if you see me trolling, if after reporting, no moderator actions were taken, tagging me is equal to deciding for moderators, that means marlboroza didn't like it when mods didn't delete my trolling posts and he decided to take the matters into his own hands and tag me red.

If what I'm saying is not sweet for DT members, tagging me by them is per-definition abuse of power, because they didn't like what I was saying. so they decided to tag me red instead.

Now actmyname:


I have absolutely no power in this forum. all I did was suggesting/hinting for DT members to tell them that we shouldn't be allowed to be the only ones capable of removing the tags, there should be a protocol to prevent any possible abuse of power. for instance: if you could only buy a copper membership by paying to a designated address, there will be a record for your transaction and you'd have a TXID to back your claim of payment.

But now with DT members, it would be like giving them access to whitelist members to have the perks of a copper member without them actually paying.  but if there is a standard protocol to follow, we could remove the red tags conditionally without giving DT members any chance of abusing their power for personal gains.

How would you know if marlboroza didn't ask for money to change his first tag on me? you don't and I could set him up easily just to get back at him, doing that would only cause more unwanted discussions. but if there was a system where I could for example report some garbage posts and only then my red tag could be removed, we could have eliminated all the possible ways for colluding and for any personal use of DT power.

My man, if I have weak command of English, and am unable to express my opinions perfectly, please don't take it on me by tagging me. I have no intention of scamming or stealing money from anybody here. this is again me repeating myself. this is why I would say that they are harassing me with their DT power. I have already explained myself here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36179276

Can you please explain to me how it is "wrong"? Why would you be called a scammer by default?

Trust ratings are open... comments and references are publicly displayed so people can read and understand why particular ratings have been left.

As I understand it... Red Trust does not automatically equal "scammer". If you choose to interpret red trust that way, that's your prerogative, but that's not my understanding of what it means.

Again wrong. you shouldn't tag me red if I'm not a scammer and if you are DT member. if you don't trust me and you would tag me, why should I be called a scammer by default?

i honestly think  that diagram was  a simple guy that  built his account to hero member and was enjoying his time  in the bitcoin talk forum  as his favorite social media website and  then  he screwed up in some point  ( i dont  seem to really understand whats  the case )  and  now  he is just upset about  his red trust  and  that what any other simple man will feel  ( i my self will hate to have a red trust )  so  he is starting this  thread  simply to defend him self and try to make  who tagged him get screwed up ,  am saying that because if he was not painted red  and  other ppl were  and they reached to him  for help i honesty think that he will not care  and  no one will care   since  in our  mind  we think  red = scammer which  is  right  in most cases .

and  just from reading your topic  ( before you turn it to a free service )  i will think that you turned to a scammer since you are a red painted account  that mean you dont care and you are asking  for 0.02 btc = 167.85 $  with no refund  for a simple 200 words  in less than 2 hours  with no result  and you ask the victim to red tag you ( since you dont care ) . and the fact that a paid service  is in a self moderated topic  is  scammy btw  .

Again, you seem to be on the "Red trust = scammer" train of thought.

Red Trust simply means that "Person X does NOT trust Person Y for #reasons"... it could be that Person X thinks that Person Y is a scammer, it could also mean that Person X has previously known Person Y to tell half truths and/or lie, offer dubious services, heavily edit posts repeatedly, show unstable behaviour, act irrationally and/or other "non-scam" behaviour that makes Person X consider Person Y "untrustworthy".


Additionally, a scam does not actually NEED to have "happened" for it to be labelled as a scam.

If a user was to post a thread titled "[ShitCoin Doubler] Guaranteed 100% ROI in just 24 hours for any Altcoin!", offering said service... and NOBODY actually sent any coins... do you think that the user who posted it should be tagged? or should the thread and the user go "untouched" until such time as some newbie sends coins and then complains?

If it looks like a duck... and it walks like a duck... and it quacks like a duck... it's probably a duck!



No... as they stated in the trust feedback... it was because you offered a service you could not actually provide. You called your service "Red Tag Removal", implying you could get Red Tags removed... when, in actual fact, you have no such power to remove red tags.

Had you originally set up your service as "hire me to present your case for red tag removal, success NOT guaranteed"... you might have got some raised eyebrows, and most likely ridiculed, but I doubt you would have been tagged for it.

Just my 0.00000002 btc as a casual observer of the recent happenings.

This is bullying. why would DT members keep tagging me after I have offered to help people in removing their tags? because they are bullies.

His first self vouch was pretty much a joke but if he somehow manages to restore himself from here it will be quite impressive..

It doesn't look good on you if you try to just write off valid criticism as "trolling". Just as no one is going to hire a financial advisor who is bankrupt, no one is going to hire a red tag removal service who can't even remove their own red tags.

Again, this is trolling.

It doesn't look like a serious business if you're promising to do something and not doing it even in your own reference cases.

That is trolling. you are trolling me by saying that. you are making fun of me in my serious business. all I want is a fair system based on true justice and not personal use of DT power.

It's a question based on your own OP and the second post. Which part of it is a lie?



BTW why are all three numbered "1" - are you planning multiple cases against each of us?

Because this is the start. shut this down why? because you said so? I don't think so. they can read that thread as a reference for my ability to present a case for the public to read. that's not a vouch, that is simply a reference to see if I can actually gather evidence/information. you should read the OP of that topic and tell me what you think instead of telling me to close my thread and bend over.

You don't even show a real vouch/trial of your service, you "defended" yourself and used it like it worked. You are accusing the mods for abusing their power, which is just absurd.

Eighter you grow up, or shut this thread down

@ suchmoon, this is your lie.

Why should I be called a scammer by default? show me one example of actual scam. if trust is not moderated then what happens to my reputation if I have spoken against DT members and they have tagged me? if I speak against you and you tag me, that is abuse. you don't deserve to hold any power over other people. I'm alone in this, and I will be alone apparently because all of you are busy with your jobs, posting with your paid signatures and bashing anybody who dares to speak against you. forum administration also doesn't care about me if I don't have money. all I have is my honesty and I'm glad that I have been tasked to show the people the real standard of dealing with people here. you either suck and bend over, or you have no place here. I refuse to bend over. now tag me for it, I dare you. I dare you to tag me for it. I refuse to bend over for anybody.

Yet you listed the original dispute with marlboroza as an example of your "work" and you list your current three "abuse" treads in your second post. Make up your mind.

I for one never asked you to defend yourself and clearly stated so. So you're lying right there.

Once what is sorted? you are like others suggesting me to bend over to DT members wills. I refuse to bend over. apologize for what? I want to spend my time and defend people if they are willing to compensate me for my time. I wont allow anybody to dictate their terms on my business. they are jealous. they think that if I value my time and expect for compensation, I'm a scammer. they are wrong.

Read the OP, I have clear terms, there is no scam attempt, I'm not asking cheaters to pay me and then spend their money and say that I couldn't convince DT members and that's it. I haven't even tried for once to defend anybody. DT members are trolling me with their DT power, they have tagged me and now they are asking me to defend myself, are you blind and can't you see that they are the ones trolling me and harassing me?

They don't deserve DT status and should be removed, tell me that you don't see them trolling me? forum rules should be applied for everybody equally, I'm not a scammer and I have been here for more than 2 years.

If I say that I want to defend people, and if a DT member is tagging me and asking me to show my skills in defending myself, that is trolling and harassing. but looks like forum administration has a double standard dealing with real trolls, DT members are holding me down with their power by trolling me and nobody is stopping them.

You have been tagged for trolling mods, DT members and trusted members here

I can tell you right now, it was not worth arguing about your service, can guarantee that no one would use your service.

I suggest that you apologize to the people that you "called out" and solve this problem without getting tagged by even more DT members.

Once this is sorted, I will gladly remove the tag