Topic: 😬😬😬 - page 6. (Read 2967 times)
Send 0.01 to this address first. 18Gykh4jE6fuyARzbC3XEzrALuKWFNHra4 if you have got a red tag from a DT1-2 member.
A good service digaran acting as a lawyer here in the forum to defend his client and hopefully those who are in victim case that abusing DT members by their power. I appreciate this kind of business you have not only earning profit but helping innocent people who were convicted any abusing or cheating but not true and have already negative trust without any explanation.
Hopefully, this is not only talking money and justice, I mean those deserving to be helped is a must.
Good luck with your service offered.
Hopefully, this is not only talking money and justice, I mean those deserving to be helped is a must.
Good luck with your service offered.
My latest work could be found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/calling-out-vod-for-his-trusted-input-3502223
What I understood reviewing the whole topic is: You were humiliated by almost all the comments on that topic. I see The pharmacist and marlboroza removed their redTag. May be they removed it to show some sympathy to you. They were sick and tired of your trolling I guess.I will act as their lawyer, I will expose the people in position of power for their abuse. in the end it is up to community to decide which one is trusted.
If you want to entrust your money to DT members, you should know them first, I'm here to eradicate abusers of power. I am willing to adhere to the
Rules of the forum. I would either convince DT1-2 members to remove their negative trust or would expose them for the whole community to see.
Since you are the lawyer and getting paid for it, how about the community? Will they get paid for it? They are the judge, aren't they? If you want to entrust your money to DT members, you should know them first, I'm here to eradicate abusers of power. I am willing to adhere to the
Rules of the forum. I would either convince DT1-2 members to remove their negative trust or would expose them for the whole community to see.
How do we know you aren't colluding with DT members to red tag people and split the profits 50-50?
Now we are seeing a new business concept and this time it's with trust rating.
By the way, would I get any discount since I have 5 negative trust?
And how long it will take to clean all my negative trusts, doesn't matter if you give me any discount or not SIR digaran
My life is ruined marlboroza by all these negative trusts
Is it possible to defend my case?
digaran did such a fantastic job with his first case that this user at the time of this writing has 0 negative feedback on their profile! I'm absolutely amazed, so it was a .01 well spent then, eh? More seriously, why did you believe you had negative feedback?
I'm guessing that they are speaking on behalf of one of their alt accounts.
I wouldn't delete your posts.
Who cares? as long as negative trust is illegit, it should be removed. I will take advantage of reasonable doubt. I want to act as a lawyer.
How do we know you aren't colluding with DT members to red tag people and split the profits 50-50?
Who cares? as long as negative trust is illegit, it should be removed. I will take advantage of reasonable doubt. I want to act as a lawyer.
Is it possible to defend my case?
digaran did such a fantastic job with his first case that this user at the time of this writing has 0 negative feedback on their profile! I'm absolutely amazed, so it was a .01 well spent then, eh? More seriously, why did you believe you had negative feedback?
My account got tag because I don't read the rules for joining sosmed Campaign.
It's happened a long time ago. Afterwards, I try to get second chance but he not response at all.
Is it possible to defend my case?
Eh, it seems like you tagged someone, not the other way around. It's happened a long time ago. Afterwards, I try to get second chance but he not response at all.
Is it possible to defend my case?
How do we know you aren't colluding with DT members to red tag people and split the profits 50-50?
For him to even possibly collude,he would have to speak something that would make sense. And we all know digaran wouldn't do that.Stop trying to extort $ for ratings.
He is not doing that. He is just blabbering something from which he knows,he will get the community's attention. Digaran's intentions are weird but has got something to do ,which may or maynot be beneficial in the "long run". His plan is working out just as he expected. He trolls others,he uses his sarcasm in a serious manner,misleading people much often. He got himself,red-tagged,and he has got a lot more to do. Now not sure,what exactly he is trying to accomplish by doing all of this....
Digaran is just a troll, he enjoys this attention.
And that is all anyone needs to know.
it is fortunate enough if this post isn't going to be trash by digaran.
Digaran is just a troll, he enjoys this attention.
And that is all anyone needs to know.
How do we know you aren't colluding with DT members to red tag people and split the profits 50-50?
If you can find proof of this I would be extremely interested in seeing it. To my knowledge there aren't many, if any, people that are DT members and willing to risk their reputation by working with such a volatile and controversial user on a minimally beneficial scheme such as this. I honestly doubt that is the case. More realistically, digaran got their negative rating from marlboroza changed from a negative to a neutral after throwing a fit around the forum for about a week. Digaran tried to backpedal and explain away their statements that resulted in the negative rating. The ending result is either, digaran is a troll or digaran is lying and extorting members further than originally intended/explained.
It seems I have forgotten my sarcasm tag, although I think the forum is in a sad state if my comment could be taken seriously. Digaran is just a troll, he enjoys this attention.
The whole money part defeats the purpose of this thread, IMHO. You will most probably be hired by scammers for defending, than real victims of false red tags. But I appreciate your service, it's new, it's innovative. Might even be useful to some victims. As a suggestion, I can say that maybe you can first try to take up some small cases for free, show your talent and then launch the paid service. Pretty much like PIL (Public Interest Litigation, could be known by other names in different countries) in courts.
DT does not imply that you are trustworthy with money, rather it implies that you leave accurate ratings.
Not acting as an accomplice of digaran but he's explained it.Quote
whether you lie or tell the truth, people are the ones I care about. judge my case to show to the people that your positive trust with no reference is justified and you haven't been abusing your position.
In this statement it definitely shows what kind of character and custom oneself need to possess if they want to be part of this community and not just a a person who participates in an airdrop and such alike.
Pretty good service, for who doesnt deserve to get negative trust. So here I want to ask you what would you chose, money or justice?
I imagine this scheme (dont take this serious) :
1. Scammer/non-scammer ask for help, and he/she paid the charge
2. You can't get him/her out from red tag
3. He open scam accusation, but you can defend yourself and make him get more exposed for being scammer
4. You can live freely with the money you got from him/her.
What do you think?
I imagine this scheme (dont take this serious) :
1. Scammer/non-scammer ask for help, and he/she paid the charge
2. You can't get him/her out from red tag
3. He open scam accusation, but you can defend yourself and make him get more exposed for being scammer
4. You can live freely with the money you got from him/her.
What do you think?
The whole money part defeats the purpose of this thread, IMHO. You will most probably be hired by scammers for defending, than real victims of false red tags. But I appreciate your service, it's new, it's innovative. Might even be useful to some victims. As a suggestion, I can say that maybe you can first try to take up some small cases for free, show your talent and then launch the paid service. Pretty much like PIL (Public Interest Litigation, could be known by other names in different countries) in courts.
This service implies that there is a flaw with the Default Trust network and that its members are expected to leave a wrongful negative feedback rating, which defeats the purpose of having said member in the DT network.
Why not use your energy to identify the flaws with the current DT2 members that are abusing their powers so they can "get kicked out from their positions" rather than coercing some poor member into paying you 0.01BTC with the expectation that you'll get the rating removed, or funnier yet, the DT2 member kicked...
Honestly, @digaran, it has come to the point where I'm not sure whether this post is an actual serious service that you're offering, or if it's an attempt at trolling. I never know with you.
Why not use your energy to identify the flaws with the current DT2 members that are abusing their powers so they can "get kicked out from their positions" rather than coercing some poor member into paying you 0.01BTC with the expectation that you'll get the rating removed, or funnier yet, the DT2 member kicked...
Honestly, @digaran, it has come to the point where I'm not sure whether this post is an actual serious service that you're offering, or if it's an attempt at trolling. I never know with you.
I will expose the people in position of power for their abuse.
Have you ever done this in the past? What if the trust rating is justified?
If you want to entrust your money to DT members, you should know them first
I thought we were talking about trust ratings, not money. How does DT members giving you a negative rating mean that you are entrusting them with your money? Your logic train is slippery as a wet lizard.
I'm here to eradicate abusers of power. I would either convince DT1-2 members to remove their negative trust or would expose them for the whole community to see.
I would like to join your fight against the abusers of power. Please, share with us the information that you are planning to expose for the whole community to see. Either you have evidence of abuses of power already, or you are talking out of your ass. Claiming that you will expose abuses of power, where there may be none, is simply nonsensical. I'd like some evidence, because leaving you a negative rating when you talked about extorting users to remove negative ratings is not an abuse of power; your bad jokes are piling up and I would ask that you take a step back to analyze.
First you talk about extorting scammers to remove your negative rating, meaning your word and ratings are worth nothing. Now you're talking about getting paid by scammers to extort DT members to remove their ratings. You are a very interesting specimen, digaran. You get in trouble, kicked out of your campaign and then grovel at the feet of other members until you are pitied enough to be given a second change. Then you slightly rearrange what you just got scolded for and are making another attempt at it.
No matter how much you polish a turd, it does not become a diamond. Stop trying to extort $ for ratings. I don't care who's rating it is, who's the receiver or what the reason is. If you know of some injustice and you demand a fee before taking a stand against this injustice, then you are a scumbag that doesn't care about truth or justice. You are concerned with lining your pockets. Please try to see how this looks to anybody on the outside. If I was marlboroza, this thread alone would be enough to make me revert my rating to negative.
How do we know you aren't colluding with DT members to red tag people and split the profits 50-50?
If you can find proof of this I would be extremely interested in seeing it. To my knowledge there aren't many, if any, people that are DT members and willing to risk their reputation by working with such a volatile and controversial user on a minimally beneficial scheme such as this. I honestly doubt that is the case. More realistically, digaran got their negative rating from marlboroza changed from a negative to a neutral after throwing a fit around the forum for about a week. Digaran tried to backpedal and explain away their statements that resulted in the negative rating. The ending result is either, digaran is a troll or digaran is lying and extorting members further than originally intended/explained.
He got his own rating changed, and now he is laughing in marlboroza's face, while believing themselves to be on a special platform.
I assume my posts will be deleted in your self-moderated thread, but just know that you gave me a big laugh and smile from reading this thread.
Jump to: