You always fix things very quickly.
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 48. (Read 499597 times)
October 13, 2012, 02:33:32 AM
You always fix things very quickly.
October 13, 2012, 01:54:09 AM
Thanks Inaba I am getting emails again.
You always fix things very quickly.
You always fix things very quickly.
October 13, 2012, 12:43:14 AM
I can verify, I started receiving email notices again.
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:53:04 -0500
I run my own mail server on a VPS.
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:53:04 -0500
I run my own mail server on a VPS.
October 13, 2012, 12:26:39 AM
Hi, I am using cgminer 2.7.5 now, connected to server 3.
why is the the pool showing only 50% of my ghash? should be 10gh
my local hashpower is ok and my utility is around 30.
I noticed a lot of these messages:
[2012-10-13 12:50:16] Rejected f7dcbe25.ca8236c2 ICA 2 pool 0 (high-hash)
anything that I can do here?
why is the the pool showing only 50% of my ghash? should be 10gh
my local hashpower is ok and my utility is around 30.
I noticed a lot of these messages:
[2012-10-13 12:50:16] Rejected f7dcbe25.ca8236c2 ICA 2 pool 0 (high-hash)
anything that I can do here?
October 12, 2012, 07:00:52 PM
Ok, emails should be fixed now, I found the problem.
October 12, 2012, 06:26:18 PM
That sounds about like when the last one showed up. Since I had changed nothing on my accont page and the email delivery should still be checked could you look into why they stopped?
October 12, 2012, 06:05:38 PM
Hotmail is going through fine as well. I show the last mail being sent to you Askit2, was on the 7th of October.
October 12, 2012, 05:57:25 PM
Mine was Hotmail. I have no idea why it stopped. It could be they blocked it or something but it seems odd that it only very occasionally went to junk mail.
October 12, 2012, 05:32:38 PM
Gmail seems to be delivering fine. Did you check your spam folder?
October 12, 2012, 04:59:36 PM
Speaking of missing emails... I am not getting notifications of when one of my miners goes offline. (I used to.) I'm on gmail.com.
October 12, 2012, 02:47:37 PM
Someone please call an ambulance, I think I am having a heart attack.
In the meantime, while I'm in limbo, before the paramedics revive me, I am going to check that the temperature in hell hasn't dropped below zero.
I submitted a block removal request to Comcast about an hour ago and just got an email back from them telling me they have removed the block on the new IPs. So not only did Comcast actually respond (a hell freezing over worthy response), but they responded appropriately and positively... WITHIN AN HOUR.
Someone call the $#@#$%@ new stations, because this is a @#$@ banner day in Internet History right here. Comcast actually responded, responded in a timely fashion, and responded appropriately. Holy crap. Maybe I really am dead.
(Comcast email addresses should now be able to receive email)
In the meantime, while I'm in limbo, before the paramedics revive me, I am going to check that the temperature in hell hasn't dropped below zero.
I submitted a block removal request to Comcast about an hour ago and just got an email back from them telling me they have removed the block on the new IPs. So not only did Comcast actually respond (a hell freezing over worthy response), but they responded appropriately and positively... WITHIN AN HOUR.
Someone call the $#@#$%@ new stations, because this is a @#$@ banner day in Internet History right here. Comcast actually responded, responded in a timely fashion, and responded appropriately. Holy crap. Maybe I really am dead.
(Comcast email addresses should now be able to receive email)
Quoted for when comcast inevitably effs up again....
October 12, 2012, 01:37:11 PM
Someone please call an ambulance, I think I am having a heart attack.
In the meantime, while I'm in limbo, before the paramedics revive me, I am going to check that the temperature in hell hasn't dropped below zero.
I submitted a block removal request to Comcast about an hour ago and just got an email back from them telling me they have removed the block on the new IPs. So not only did Comcast actually respond (a hell freezing over worthy response), but they responded appropriately and positively... WITHIN AN HOUR.
Someone call the $#@#$%@ new stations, because this is a @#$@ banner day in Internet History right here. Comcast actually responded, responded in a timely fashion, and responded appropriately. Holy crap. Maybe I really am dead.
(Comcast email addresses should now be able to receive email)
In the meantime, while I'm in limbo, before the paramedics revive me, I am going to check that the temperature in hell hasn't dropped below zero.
I submitted a block removal request to Comcast about an hour ago and just got an email back from them telling me they have removed the block on the new IPs. So not only did Comcast actually respond (a hell freezing over worthy response), but they responded appropriately and positively... WITHIN AN HOUR.
Someone call the $#@#$%@ new stations, because this is a @#$@ banner day in Internet History right here. Comcast actually responded, responded in a timely fashion, and responded appropriately. Holy crap. Maybe I really am dead.
(Comcast email addresses should now be able to receive email)
October 12, 2012, 01:06:30 PM
If you don't mind posting, what is your domain name for your email? I can look into why it's not being delivered.
Also - Vardiff has been disabled, since it's redundant and hardly anyone was using it. If you were one of the 800 MH/s that was mining on it, you might want to repoint your miner to US1.
I am going to be upping the share targets on the servers as follows:
US1: 20
US2: 24
US3: 28
Also - Vardiff has been disabled, since it's redundant and hardly anyone was using it. If you were one of the 800 MH/s that was mining on it, you might want to repoint your miner to US1.
I am going to be upping the share targets on the servers as follows:
US1: 20
US2: 24
US3: 28
October 12, 2012, 02:26:50 AM
I have been mining on eclipseMC since may 7th with a BFL single and just got my third block today so that is YAY!
I still don't get emails at BTC block solves. Last one I got was 2012-10-7, 13:50:04.
I have tried unchecking the btc block solve emails, then change, then Recheck btc block solve emals then change.
That didn't do anything. I suppose I could try setting up either a miner fail email or name coin block email but I was realy not interested in them.
I am on hotmail but until sunday afternoon I recieved the emails properly or at least most of them. I know Inaba will look into it and I appreciate all he does.
I still don't get emails at BTC block solves. Last one I got was 2012-10-7, 13:50:04.
I have tried unchecking the btc block solve emails, then change, then Recheck btc block solve emals then change.
That didn't do anything. I suppose I could try setting up either a miner fail email or name coin block email but I was realy not interested in them.
I am on hotmail but until sunday afternoon I recieved the emails properly or at least most of them. I know Inaba will look into it and I appreciate all he does.
October 11, 2012, 11:43:02 PM
Hey Inaba could you check the email system. The last email I had delivered to inbox or junk mail was on Sunday.
Thank You!
Thank You!
The last email notice I received from EMC was timestamped:
Sun, 7 Oct 2012 14:54:14 -0500
I just logged in and noticed we've been solving blocks after all! For awhile I thought we were having a period of really bad luck.
October 11, 2012, 05:28:02 PM
Sweet Baby Jesus I just scored my first block today !!!!!!! WHOO HOOO
Yeah, I've only been mining for 3 weeks on a BFL single and I've found 2 (yes TWO!) blocks in the last week. With good luck like that, I'm probably doomed to NEVER find another one in my life! 
October 11, 2012, 11:37:48 AM
Sweet Baby Jesus I just scored my first block today !!!!!!! WHOO HOOO
October 11, 2012, 03:00:54 AM
...
Unless you plan on making the relationship completely linear and reducing pool D to less than one? It would be a great selling point for the tinier miners.
Although cgminer already works with LTC mining and thus handles fractional D, it wont actually work in any BTC miner (or cgminer) since they all check for H=0 thus you'd lose valid shares if D < 1Unless you plan on making the relationship completely linear and reducing pool D to less than one? It would be a great selling point for the tinier miners.
Seriously, that's a hard limit in all BTC mining since all BTC devices only return 1 Diff shares (H=0)
That's a big part of the 6.25% performance optimisation in GPU mining ... and anyone who reads this, and is thinking of suggesting all the mining devices and GPU OCL code be rewritten, simply doesn't understand the negative implications or the time wasted in trying to do that
Thanks for that explanation kano - I'd wondered about D < 1 ever since var diff was first proposed.
October 11, 2012, 03:00:01 AM
I am assuming letting miners pick their target is a losing option based solely on my opinion of human nature.
Seems to work ok at HHTT.
I don't know about "the biggest miners donate the least." I haven't seen any data on the subject. I have however seen lots of smaller miners complain when Ozcoin introduced fees a little while back. Shock! Horror! Paying for a pool? Inconceivable!
Anyway, this is now sufficiently OT. I return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
October 11, 2012, 02:47:25 AM
...
Unless you plan on making the relationship completely linear and reducing pool D to less than one? It would be a great selling point for the tinier miners.
Although cgminer already works with LTC mining and thus handles fractional D, it wont actually work in any BTC miner (or cgminer) since they all check for H=0 thus you'd lose valid shares if D < 1Unless you plan on making the relationship completely linear and reducing pool D to less than one? It would be a great selling point for the tinier miners.
Seriously, that's a hard limit in all BTC mining since all BTC devices only return 1 Diff shares (H=0)
That's a big part of the 6.25% performance optimisation in GPU mining ... and anyone who reads this, and is thinking of suggesting all the mining devices and GPU OCL code be rewritten, simply doesn't understand the negative implications or the time wasted in trying to do that
Jump to: