Josh can you look into my login issues please?
my account says my 2fa failed but i know its right.
Thanks
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 6. (Read 499702 times)
January 17, 2014, 01:30:06 PM
January 17, 2014, 05:35:41 AM
Yes, luck factor is calculated exactly as you describe Organofcorti.
I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.
Nope, none of them really make much sense anyway (to me) when you 'average' them I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.
I just took the comment at the bottom about 50% to mean that 50% was expected.
Clearly, I did that wrong
Certainly not a request to change it.
January 17, 2014, 01:46:46 AM
Yes, luck factor is calculated exactly as you describe Organofcorti.
I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.
I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.
I think that the CDF and shares per round are both useful, but both need to be explained clearly for miners.
My preference is for the CDF. Maybe others prefer shares per round, although it's only under proportional payment methods that shares per round is linked closely to reward for each miner.
January 17, 2014, 12:30:06 AM
Yes, luck factor is calculated exactly as you describe Organofcorti.
I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.
I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.
January 16, 2014, 11:58:56 PM
I thought it was just that 50% means expected number of shares.
I just logged in - it looks like he's using the upper tail CDF to indicate luck. I reckon this is probably the best way to do it since the "luck" definition is bounded equally at 0 and 1, but not many other pools are doing this.
January 16, 2014, 11:53:50 PM
Just wondering if that has any roll on effect anywhere that you need to look into:
280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%
Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673
I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?
280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%
Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673
I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?
0.4976536 is the upper tail CDF for 0.6978511 d1 shares/difficulty. I don't have time to check atm, but if you calculate:
exp(-shares/difficulty) and this figure is the same as the percentage figure given, then the percentage is of the CDF.
Edit: Or it could just be a big fat coincidence.
January 16, 2014, 09:39:26 PM
Just wondering if that has any roll on effect anywhere that you need to look into:
280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%
Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673
I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?
280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%
Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673
I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?
0.4976536 is the upper tail CDF for 0.6978511 d1 shares/difficulty. I don't have time to check atm, but if you calculate:
exp(-shares/difficulty) and this figure is the same as the percentage figure given, then the percentage is of the CDF.
Edit: Or it could just be a big fat coincidence.
January 16, 2014, 09:18:40 PM
Just wondering if that has any roll on effect anywhere that you need to look into:
280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%
Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673
I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?
280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%
Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673
I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?
January 14, 2014, 05:18:35 PM
Difficulty is increasing rather rapidly at the moment... it will be probably be another month or two before it starts to level off again I'd guess.
January 13, 2014, 08:24:51 PM
I'm mining on EMC for about 2/3 months now and received 0.02BTC every day. Since one week I get that amount every 3(!!) days. Is something wrong with the pool or is the difficulty just breaking the roofs? Seems kinda strange that it happend so fast...
January 08, 2014, 03:55:50 PM
Seems to have gone away whatever it was, thanks.
January 08, 2014, 11:49:12 AM
Everything seems OK at the moment, are you still seeing issues?
January 08, 2014, 04:57:15 AM
Load on the US servers seems very high, total pool hashrate is way down and stats are reporting 0 for me despite my rigs merrily mining away on us1. Issues?
December 24, 2013, 12:07:39 PM
We are working on creating an automated system to unban IPs. The solution is not to have multiple failed login attempts from your IP address; it's a security measure.
December 23, 2013, 10:10:32 PM
I have been out of the country for almost 3 weeks now... still in India at the moment. Not much time to handle these sorts of things, but I'm working on it as time allows. Hopefully I'll have a break here when I get back on Sunday and can catch up.
My IP is still banned. Still no response to any of the emails I've sent.
Is this one of those situations where I should just give up? This whole experience has been rather discouraging. I mean, someone/something made the effort to put me on a blacklist for trying to log into my own account, so I figure someone could take 1 minute and say, "Your concerns are very important to us, we are very back logged, please allow 3 months for us to respond"
This is my last post regarding this issue unless I get a response. Any response would be better than sitting here not know why i can't access my account.
December 23, 2013, 05:18:14 PM
How does the EU server look from your location?
Similar to US3 but slower.
Code:
mtr --report eu.eclipsemc.com
Start: Tue Dec 24 09:16:45 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.7 26.1 25.6 26.7 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.7 26.5 25.8 28.0 0.5
4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 38.2 41.0 37.5 67.4 9.3
5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 38.0 43.2 37.7 57.3 7.5
6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.9 184.7 184.1 185.2 0.0
7.|-- init7.net.any2ix.coresite 0.0% 10 183.8 184.7 183.8 186.7 0.8
8.|-- r1nyc1.core.init7.net 0.0% 10 255.9 257.5 255.7 261.9 2.1
9.|-- r1lon1.core.init7.net 0.0% 10 329.8 333.7 329.7 341.3 3.9
10.|-- r1nue1.core.init7.net 0.0% 10 371.2 372.9 368.6 379.7 4.1
11.|-- gw-hetzner.init7.net 0.0% 10 344.5 346.6 344.5 362.0 5.4
12.|-- core12.hetzner.de 20.0% 10 344.7 344.5 343.8 345.0 0.0
13.|-- core21.hetzner.de 10.0% 10 342.4 342.7 342.0 343.4 0.0
14.|-- juniper1.rz20.hetzner.de 10.0% 10 347.3 349.2 346.8 363.7 5.4
15.|-- hos-tr2.ex3k5.rz20.hetzne 10.0% 10 347.5 348.1 347.3 350.4 0.7
16.|-- eu.eclipsemc.com 10.0% 10 344.0 351.2 342.8 372.2 11.8
Start: Tue Dec 24 09:16:45 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.7 26.1 25.6 26.7 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.7 26.5 25.8 28.0 0.5
4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 38.2 41.0 37.5 67.4 9.3
5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 38.0 43.2 37.7 57.3 7.5
6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.9 184.7 184.1 185.2 0.0
7.|-- init7.net.any2ix.coresite 0.0% 10 183.8 184.7 183.8 186.7 0.8
8.|-- r1nyc1.core.init7.net 0.0% 10 255.9 257.5 255.7 261.9 2.1
9.|-- r1lon1.core.init7.net 0.0% 10 329.8 333.7 329.7 341.3 3.9
10.|-- r1nue1.core.init7.net 0.0% 10 371.2 372.9 368.6 379.7 4.1
11.|-- gw-hetzner.init7.net 0.0% 10 344.5 346.6 344.5 362.0 5.4
12.|-- core12.hetzner.de 20.0% 10 344.7 344.5 343.8 345.0 0.0
13.|-- core21.hetzner.de 10.0% 10 342.4 342.7 342.0 343.4 0.0
14.|-- juniper1.rz20.hetzner.de 10.0% 10 347.3 349.2 346.8 363.7 5.4
15.|-- hos-tr2.ex3k5.rz20.hetzne 10.0% 10 347.5 348.1 347.3 350.4 0.7
16.|-- eu.eclipsemc.com 10.0% 10 344.0 351.2 342.8 372.2 11.8
December 23, 2013, 05:14:20 PM
How does the EU server look from your location?
December 23, 2013, 03:43:27 AM
us1 appears to be down , or maybe I just can't access it from here 
EDIT: Some loss along the way it seems.
Seems to only be relatively good to us3. Switched to that and it's ok. I guess it's out of your control being along the way.
EDIT: Some loss along the way it seems.
Code:
mtr --report us1.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:32:43 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.2 26.2 25.5 26.6 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.6 35.0 25.6 113.2 27.5
4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.6 42.0 37.4 58.0 6.4
5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.9 46.1 37.8 65.0 11.4
6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.4 184.8 184.3 185.3 0.0
7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9.|-- . 10.0% 10 216.3 199.7 186.2 216.5 15.7
mtr --report us2.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:37:57 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.9 26.3 25.7 27.0 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.9 32.2 25.9 55.6 11.7
4.|-- ae0.cr1.mel8.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 30.2 35.9 26.3 72.8 14.4
5.|-- ae1.cr1.cbr1.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.4 34.8 33.6 37.4 1.4
6.|-- ae0.cr1.cbr2.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 34.4 35.1 33.7 38.2 1.3
7.|-- ae2.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.3 41.5 37.0 68.4 9.8
8.|-- te0-1-1-3.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.5 184.7 183.8 185.4 0.0
9.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11.|-- . 10.0% 10 215.2 203.1 185.8 216.7 15.0
mtr --report us3.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:38:23 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.8 26.2 25.6 27.1 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.1 26.4 26.0 27.2 0.0
4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.8 38.0 37.8 38.7 0.0
5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 38.6 43.6 37.4 77.1 12.1
6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.8 184.7 183.9 185.2 0.0
7.|-- any2ix.coresite.com 0.0% 10 271.2 271.9 271.0 275.6 1.3
8.|-- 206-51-235-233.static.hvv 10.0% 10 241.5 242.0 241.5 242.9 0.0
9.|-- 162-216-4-199.static.hvvc 10.0% 10 242.2 252.0 241.9 271.9 14.6
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:32:43 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.2 26.2 25.5 26.6 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.6 35.0 25.6 113.2 27.5
4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.6 42.0 37.4 58.0 6.4
5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.9 46.1 37.8 65.0 11.4
6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.4 184.8 184.3 185.3 0.0
7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9.|-- . 10.0% 10 216.3 199.7 186.2 216.5 15.7
mtr --report us2.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:37:57 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.9 26.3 25.7 27.0 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.9 32.2 25.9 55.6 11.7
4.|-- ae0.cr1.mel8.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 30.2 35.9 26.3 72.8 14.4
5.|-- ae1.cr1.cbr1.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.4 34.8 33.6 37.4 1.4
6.|-- ae0.cr1.cbr2.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 34.4 35.1 33.7 38.2 1.3
7.|-- ae2.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.3 41.5 37.0 68.4 9.8
8.|-- te0-1-1-3.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.5 184.7 183.8 185.4 0.0
9.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11.|-- . 10.0% 10 215.2 203.1 185.8 216.7 15.0
mtr --report us3.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:38:23 2013
HOST: hex Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 192.168.1.254 0.0% 10 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.0
2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 25.8 26.2 25.6 27.1 0.0
3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 26.1 26.4 26.0 27.2 0.0
4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 37.8 38.0 37.8 38.7 0.0
5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net 0.0% 10 38.6 43.6 37.4 77.1 12.1
6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii. 0.0% 10 184.8 184.7 183.9 185.2 0.0
7.|-- any2ix.coresite.com 0.0% 10 271.2 271.9 271.0 275.6 1.3
8.|-- 206-51-235-233.static.hvv 10.0% 10 241.5 242.0 241.5 242.9 0.0
9.|-- 162-216-4-199.static.hvvc 10.0% 10 242.2 252.0 241.9 271.9 14.6
Seems to only be relatively good to us3. Switched to that and it's ok. I guess it's out of your control being along the way.
December 19, 2013, 06:47:31 AM
I have been out of the country for almost 3 weeks now... still in India at the moment. Not much time to handle these sorts of things, but I'm working on it as time allows. Hopefully I'll have a break here when I get back on Sunday and can catch up.
December 18, 2013, 08:10:43 PM
It's been 48 hours and still no response from [email protected]
My IP is still blocked from home.
I was able to access my account from work and I attempted to reset my password, but it said I couldn't and to contact support... this is crazy.
I think something has happened. They've probably been hacked and are locking down all activity.
Or maybe they're running off with our bitcoins... who knows, since they won't RESPOND!!!
My IP is still blocked from home.
I was able to access my account from work and I attempted to reset my password, but it said I couldn't and to contact support... this is crazy.
I think something has happened. They've probably been hacked and are locking down all activity.
Or maybe they're running off with our bitcoins... who knows, since they won't RESPOND!!!
I have no doubt Inaba will sort out your problem. Just wait a little longer.
Jump to: