luke-jr, I remember you talking about making a pool with direct payout transactions directly in the mined blocks.
I loved the idea, and it's great to see "Generated (1.10078153 matures in 9 blocks)" in bitcoin client.
Congratulations on actually doing this, it's awesome!
Now if I could just find the address for the european server (couldn't find this in wiki), I'd point all miners (2) there. Maybe you could put that in the wiki: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Eligius ?
Topic: [350 GH/s] "Eligius" (experimental) pool: almost feeless PPS, hoppers welcome - page 23. (Read 116997 times)
May 20, 2011, 06:17:32 AM
May 20, 2011, 05:28:06 AM
Looks like the US pool is down. All of my miners died with a failed HTTP request, and the pool's current hashrate is showing as 0.0.
So much for my experiment with this pool that I started yesterday. Back to deepbit, I guess.
So much for my experiment with this pool that I started yesterday. Back to deepbit, I guess.
May 20, 2011, 04:17:58 AM
Hey all,
Has the EU server gone down or is it just the stats page which isnt updating?
Saying ive only submitted 17 shares! but the graph ratio seems to be going up?
http://eligius.st/~artefact2/eu/15sE1b7Y6rLMBwwyBLGwSBTQzvB8csUfrX.htm
EDIT: It has gone slightly up now however im giving 800mh/s not 50 - is it just the graph and info thats wrong, id hate to only get a tiny share if we find a block
Has the EU server gone down or is it just the stats page which isnt updating?
Saying ive only submitted 17 shares! but the graph ratio seems to be going up?
http://eligius.st/~artefact2/eu/15sE1b7Y6rLMBwwyBLGwSBTQzvB8csUfrX.htm
EDIT: It has gone slightly up now however im giving 800mh/s not 50 - is it just the graph and info thats wrong, id hate to only get a tiny share if we find a block
May 19, 2011, 06:12:59 PM
May 19, 2011, 05:24:09 PM
I'm getting a lot of stale shares. Is this normal for Eligius? Are rejected blocks bad?
This suggests a problem on your miner. What address?I don't know what you mean by "what address". If you mean my receiving address, it's: 1MX12iNFncGnuxja4xpwSF66Zx6xcA5hmY
I'm located in Michigan, USA. My internet is pretty stable and good there. There were no known problems last night.
I'm using phoenix with the following settings:
phoenix -u http://
phoenix -u http://1MX12iNFncGnuxja4xpwSF66Zx6xcA5hmY:@pool.bitcoin.dashjr.org:8337/ -k poclbm DEVICE=0 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=5 WORKSIZE=128
May 19, 2011, 02:59:31 PM
I too have had quite a low efficiency when mining on this pool.
I've got a variety of systems contributing, some of them are Windows and some of them are OSX. It seems that all of the OSX systems have horrid efficiency, while all of the Windows ones are working great.
The OSX systems are running poclbm-mod.py. Here is what I see:
In all OSX examples I am using the following command line to launch the miners:
python poclbm-mod.py --user=1PC5hWLgpmLZie7Mqvt2GiU5zrSQkzWVJP --pass=blahblah -o pool.bitcoin.dashjr.org -p 8337 -d 0
Are the above symptoms a result of a mistake on my part? Or is it something beyond my control?
For reference my bitcoin address is 1PC5hWLgpmLZie7Mqvt2GiU5zrSQkzWVJP.
Thanks for any help,
--TE
I've got a variety of systems contributing, some of them are Windows and some of them are OSX. It seems that all of the OSX systems have horrid efficiency, while all of the Windows ones are working great.
The OSX systems are running poclbm-mod.py. Here is what I see:
Quote
19/05/2011 13:04:40, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:11:09, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:40:32, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:05:17, d6abb7d2, invalid or stale at 21% of getwork[73]
19/05/2011 14:06:43, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:33:20, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 15:07:23, long poll: new block
Another OSX system sees this:19/05/2011 13:11:09, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:40:32, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:05:17, d6abb7d2, invalid or stale at 21% of getwork[73]
19/05/2011 14:06:43, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:33:20, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 15:07:23, long poll: new block
Quote
19/05/2011 12:09:16, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:13:50, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:18:19, 371825f1, invalid or stale at 21% of getwork[83]
19/05/2011 12:29:27, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:33:52, fafb858a, accepted at 8% of getwork[85]
19/05/2011 12:42:10, d9b20eb9, invalid or stale at 57% of getwork[85]
19/05/2011 12:42:27, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:51:31, b65eaae6, invalid or stale at 16% of getwork[87]
19/05/2011 13:04:40, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:11:09, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:29:36, 840c5e4b, accepted at 2% of getwork[92]
19/05/2011 13:37:54, 4faa183e, invalid or stale at 49% of getwork[92]
19/05/2011 13:40:32, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:59:25, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:20:28, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:33:20, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:50:47, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:58:32, a469581e, invalid or stale at 12% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:01:41, ef8738d0, invalid or stale at 30% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:03:36, 8dd2b234, invalid or stale at 41% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:06:44, 20c65cb2, invalid or stale at 58% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:07:22, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 15:29:01, long poll: new block
I've never seen efficiency higher than 5% so far.19/05/2011 12:13:50, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:18:19, 371825f1, invalid or stale at 21% of getwork[83]
19/05/2011 12:29:27, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:33:52, fafb858a, accepted at 8% of getwork[85]
19/05/2011 12:42:10, d9b20eb9, invalid or stale at 57% of getwork[85]
19/05/2011 12:42:27, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 12:51:31, b65eaae6, invalid or stale at 16% of getwork[87]
19/05/2011 13:04:40, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:11:09, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:29:36, 840c5e4b, accepted at 2% of getwork[92]
19/05/2011 13:37:54, 4faa183e, invalid or stale at 49% of getwork[92]
19/05/2011 13:40:32, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 13:59:25, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:20:28, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:33:20, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:50:47, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 14:58:32, a469581e, invalid or stale at 12% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:01:41, ef8738d0, invalid or stale at 30% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:03:36, 8dd2b234, invalid or stale at 41% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:06:44, 20c65cb2, invalid or stale at 58% of getwork[103]
19/05/2011 15:07:22, long poll: new block
19/05/2011 15:29:01, long poll: new block
In all OSX examples I am using the following command line to launch the miners:
python poclbm-mod.py --user=1PC5hWLgpmLZie7Mqvt2GiU5zrSQkzWVJP --pass=blahblah -o pool.bitcoin.dashjr.org -p 8337 -d 0
Are the above symptoms a result of a mistake on my part? Or is it something beyond my control?
For reference my bitcoin address is 1PC5hWLgpmLZie7Mqvt2GiU5zrSQkzWVJP.
Thanks for any help,
--TE
May 19, 2011, 01:46:30 PM
Just joined the mining at Eligius EU server. Seems to work really well, no problems on my end. I'm crunching numbers 77 mhash/s. Approximately 1/30 shares are stale for me, is that ratio ok?
I've only done 30 shares so far so that ratio might be inaccurate due to small sample size, but anyway...
I've only done 30 shares so far so that ratio might be inaccurate due to small sample size, but anyway...
May 19, 2011, 11:36:15 AM
I'm getting a lot of stale shares. Is this normal for Eligius? Are rejected blocks bad?
This suggests a problem on your miner. What address? May 19, 2011, 08:29:42 AM
I'm getting a lot of stale shares. Is this normal for Eligius? Are rejected blocks bad?
I crunched last night and got about 22 accepted and 115 rejected. On deepbit, I've got 12 accepted, 0 rejected.
I'd really like to support one of the smaller pools, but having a reject rate of 5/1 sounds really bad (is it?). I've nearly got the same number of accepted blocks in 1 hour from deepbit that I had all last night from Eligius.
Any ideas on how to solve this? Do I even need to solve this?
I crunched last night and got about 22 accepted and 115 rejected. On deepbit, I've got 12 accepted, 0 rejected.
I'd really like to support one of the smaller pools, but having a reject rate of 5/1 sounds really bad (is it?). I've nearly got the same number of accepted blocks in 1 hour from deepbit that I had all last night from Eligius.
Any ideas on how to solve this? Do I even need to solve this?
May 19, 2011, 12:28:31 AM
http://eligius.st now has a community wiki.
May 18, 2011, 04:26:20 PM
Here's an overview of donations to the pool in case anyone's interested: http://bitpoll.dyndns.org/?poll=2
That's neat. Would be cool to show it on the main site... maybe a script to append it to bitcoin: URI text?I think I don't quite understand "a script to append it to bitcoin: URI text".
May 18, 2011, 03:52:03 PM
Here's an overview of donations to the pool in case anyone's interested: http://bitpoll.dyndns.org/?poll=2
That's neat. Would be cool to show it on the main site... maybe a script to append it to bitcoin: URI text?I think I don't quite understand "a script to append it to bitcoin: URI text".
May 18, 2011, 03:27:01 PM
Here's an overview of donations to the pool in case anyone's interested: http://bitpoll.dyndns.org/?poll=2
That's neat. Would be cool to show it on the main site... maybe a script to append it to bitcoin: URI text? May 18, 2011, 03:09:31 PM
Here's an overview of donations to the pool in case anyone's interested: http://bitpoll.dyndns.org/?poll=2
(I recently joined the pool and was looking for a website :-), well, I donated a little.
(I recently joined the pool and was looking for a website :-), well, I donated a little.
May 18, 2011, 02:37:44 PM
EU server just had a MASSIVE amount of luck!!!
May 18, 2011, 12:13:21 PM
I knew whinging about it would solve a block
May 18, 2011, 11:45:01 AM
although ithought that you had combined the EU and US servers so when they found a block, i would presume we get paid too?
They are still separate, and probably will be for a while. Combining them is not trivial due to the immediate payout stuff.ALso, is there a current way of finding out just how much the server thinks me alone is hashing (should be in the 1 gh/s range)
http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/hashrate.php?addr=15sE1b7Y6rLMBwwyBLGwSBTQzvB8csUfrX May 18, 2011, 11:34:04 AM
Now that is VERY interesting, it is stating on the page you have made we found a block today, yet my balance still hasnt been transfered across, now the balance is at 7.5BTC
I cannot do any research without an address to look up... There is currently about 10 BTC delayed today, due to a lot of the sub-1-BTC-per-day-earners reaching their minimum and being paid out.Hi mate, I pm'd you ages ago with the account (a fair few hours ago) but the details are
15sE1b7Y6rLMBwwyBLGwSBTQzvB8csUfrX
But i believe I was paid out 3.14 BTC from that last block, so it must just be we havent found a block since, although ithought that you had combined the EU and US servers so when they found a block, i would presume we get paid too?
ALso, is there a current way of finding out just how much the server thinks me alone is hashing (should be in the 1 gh/s range)
May 18, 2011, 11:12:06 AM
Now that is VERY interesting, it is stating on the page you have made we found a block today, yet my balance still hasnt been transfered across, now the balance is at 7.5BTC
I cannot do any research without an address to look up... There is currently about 10 BTC delayed today, due to a lot of the sub-1-BTC-per-day-earners reaching their minimum and being paid out.how to move to EU server? stop miner and start again?
change domain to eu.mining.eligius.st May 18, 2011, 11:09:24 AM
how to move to EU server? stop miner and start again?
Jump to: