Pages:
Author

Topic: [350 GH/s] "Eligius" (experimental) pool: almost feeless PPS, hoppers welcome - page 19. (Read 116939 times)

member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
can you give me the url to US one just to make sure I'm on it?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
If you are on the EU server, then you wont recieve anything, purrely and simply because they havent found a block for ages Sad

If you are on the US server, you would have recieved something by now Smiley
member
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
I've been mining for over a 4 days now on eligius and I still havent seen a drop of bitcoins.... what gives? I realize I'm mining with a really bad GPU (GTX 258) and getting only 60 mhash/s but shouldn't I atleast be getting SOME bitcoins? like some change? I have a high number of stales too 196 at the moment, but I have 4,383 accepted. Am I misunderstanding how bitcoin mining works? Should I even try to mine with 60 Mhash/s?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Is the EU pool actually working? i know it says it is but 1 block in 7 days is VERY unlucky
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006
Phoenix 1.48 shows in slow mining mode (~9 MH/s) also a LOT of stale/"rejected" shares (15 out of 16 currently). My guess is, that with more than 1 phoenix instance long polling does only work for a single instance...

If this happens with only a single miner too though, the error must be somewhere else.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
I had problems with phoenix when I first joined. Might be because I was using bare 1.4 and didnt patch up to 1.46 or 1.47 (.48?)

ufasoft was working fine with shares, but this is what i got with phoenix (runing at the same time):

Code:
[29/05/2011 04:15:06] Connected to server
[29/05/2011 04:18:33] Result: bd073ad5 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:22:36] Result: 89a48906 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:28:51] Result: fd7dd4fe rejected
[29/05/2011 04:29:42] Result: 6e8fc933 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:34:38] Result: 455523db rejected
[29/05/2011 04:39:58] Result: 38871b48 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:40:00] Result: 0e546772 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:43:58] Result: a4e59700 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:46:58] Result: b99add02 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:53:20] Result: d1672e38 rejected
[29/05/2011 04:55:21] Result: e12761fc rejected
[29/05/2011 04:56:49] Result: 4dfbb76f rejected
[29/05/2011 04:57:08] Result: bdbbbfeb rejected
[29/05/2011 05:06:28] Result: efcec0ff rejected
[2[29/05/2011 05:07:02] Disconnected from server
[21.59 Mhash/sec] [0 Accepted] [14 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)

I stopped it and ran the regular pcolbm miner instead at nearly the same rate.

(however I just got this on it:

Code:
29/05/2011 06:24:13, long poll exception:                   
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/math32/.bitcoin/BitcoinMiner.py", line 259, in longPollThread
    (connection, result) = self.request(connection, url, self.headers)
  File "/home/math32/.bitcoin/BitcoinMiner.py", line 222, in request
    response = connection.getresponse()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 990, in getresponse
    response.begin()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 391, in begin
    version, status, reason = self._read_status()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 349, in _read_status
    line = self.fp.readline()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/socket.py", line 427, in readline
    data = recv(1)
timeout: timed out

is that normal?!)

Im  1BTFUtEscdizVPGiqrKhpy5s6QiQ4nNemC if that helps track this down.

newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Payouts of 1.0 BTC might be a bit high.

Someone asked 1BTC or once a week (once the credit is a week old? pool credits from the week? dont know), but 1.0BTC has exploded over the last 6 weeks and is about to get a lot higher.

Of course it's an odd thing - soon it will be downright a waste of power and real money to use anything < 10-20MH/s, if it isnt already (unless it's people at work or school leveraging employer's/school's power lol). Im just playing around with BITCOIN and dont have real gear here, a whole 30-35MH/s woot lol. (possibly not economically viable with airconditioning on in the summer...)

If the market keeps climbing like it is, it's quite possible to asymptotically never get paid - until you stop contributing to the pool. That's a strange incentive to provide to pool members - to leave the pool!

Unless it keeps load on the server down by not having to service pissant miners like me - a nice incentive to GTFO and let the big boys do the real work?

Just wondering whats going to happen when the minimum payout of 1.0BTC is on avg 50 6990's running for a month and is worth $1200 USD. (Sorry thats a top of my head guess, i could be off by a magnitude or 3 -- there's some relatively linear range of values for difficulty:$USD exchange rate on mtgox, bitcharts has the data). You get what I mean.

perhaps payouts should be when they're equivalent to one USD according to MTGOX or average of the largest 3-5 exchanges or something.

Feel free to base it on Euros too, or some basket of currencies. Maybe we should base it on the price of oil, since electricity tracks that somewhat too... lol. Economics 101 fun!

really, it should just be based on the current difficulty, relative, say, to what 1 BTC:cur difficulty is right now. (434883, for reference when this topic is another 3-6 weeks old...)

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
In my mind, this would justify adding a long-term 0.7% "fee" to the pools, but I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to just publish the information and ask everyone to keep this fact in mind when considering donating to the pool.

That's a great Idea. Artefact2 could add some calculations for the individual stats like "The Patch written by Luke-Jr resulted in approx. XYZ more BTC for you since you've joined Eligius. How about donating a part of this for the Pool"
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0

In the meantime, the stats main page has been improved : there's a hashing power graph and a list of recently found blocks. Check it out here !

Edit: done. I had to reset the individual graphes, but this time should be the last.

Awesome page!

Do you have a hashrate distribution diagram? Like showing the statistical distribution and stddevs for the population.  That'd be interesting to see. Also would be interesting to see is the movement overtime of 2std devs or so of the hashrate population above and below the mean, graphed over time. This will show how fast the pool is increasing its power per individual contributor (not that contributors cant generate more addresses for themselves to mine with..)

Awesome work thanks! Soon as I have some BTC's ill start donating lol.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
US MySQL is taking forever to add an id column. Europe should be fine in the meantime.
MySQL? What are you using that piece of shit for? Grin I guess it's simpler than Postgres.
I'd probably use Postgres if I knew it. But MySQL has phpMyAdmin, so... I did consider switching anyway when the MySQL people told me I couldn't do replication that wasn't 1:1, but then the Postgres people said the same thing.

Stats are being moved to http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/ but it isn't done yet.

phppgadmin - web-based administration tool for PostgreSQL

course, real men just use really huge xterms instead and alot of scrollback... Smiley
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
US MySQL is taking forever to add an id column. Europe should be fine in the meantime.

MySQL? What are you using that piece of shit for? Grin I guess it's simpler than Postgres.

SRSLY, responsible financial institutions use postgres. It's a question of how serious
your local bank-pool is about transactions! Smiley

Then again, replication between nodes is a lot easier with mysql, at my last look. Could be better now in pgsql...
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
idea: take email address as password, send periodic emails (on block solves and payment sent)
If, then please only optional + with unsubscribe feature (as this might be an easy way to spam people by subscribing them via this system to a mailing list)

except we've finally invented the proof-of-work-to-spam system. You have to mine to spam them. And the spam isnt very interesting.

It'd be great if spammers joined the pool to spam out block solves and payment information, and contributed GH/s to the pool! not likely tho.. Smiley

maybe "-- This payment info message brought to you by [1a|_iS!!!!"

lol.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
FYI, after a week of testing on Europe, I have calculated that a patch I wrote decreases duplicate work by 0.7%. Given the current pool size of 60 GH/s, that means we now (once I apply it to the USA pool) accomplish a whole 420 MH/s extra than an unpatched bitcoind, or almost 1 BTC per day at the current difficulty. Even half of that, 0.50 BTC per day, would take only until the end of the current difficulty to cover the expense of the time I spent writing the patch.

In my mind, this would justify adding a long-term 0.7% "fee" to the pools, but I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to just publish the information and ask everyone to keep this fact in mind when considering donating to the pool.


You're a great guy.

I'm going to give the pool a 1-2 day test run.
I hope I can figure out the stat page to check progress after some hours.  Tongue
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 100
how 'bout it, luke, wanna try this first, before you put a fee?
Like I said, I'm not putting a fee. And there's no easy way to figure out the overall pool costs. Hence, it's ok if people just donate what they consider a fair amount every once in a while. Smiley
you really should go for a small fee like you said. that would still be much better than the competition.

the problem with donations is that only the good guys pay. and because of that I do not want to donate any more and thus become a bad guy myself >=)



Should I remind that the pool already keeps all the tx fees ? It's not uncommon at all to see blocks found with > 0.1 BTC fees (some even have > 0.3). So, in the long term, the more hashpower the pool has, the less need for a fee there is.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1019
how 'bout it, luke, wanna try this first, before you put a fee?
Like I said, I'm not putting a fee. And there's no easy way to figure out the overall pool costs. Hence, it's ok if people just donate what they consider a fair amount every once in a while. Smiley
you really should go for a small fee like you said. that would still be much better than the competition.

the problem with donations is that only the good guys pay. and because of that I do not want to donate any more and thus become a bad guy myself >=)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Come on people, this is the only pool where you can independently verify that you are getting the real payout via blockexplorer, join up!
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
how 'bout it, luke, wanna try this first, before you put a fee?
Like I said, I'm not putting a fee. And there's no easy way to figure out the overall pool costs. Hence, it's ok if people just donate what they consider a fair amount every once in a while. Smiley
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
In my mind, this would justify adding a long-term 0.7% "fee" to the pools, but I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to just publish the information and ask everyone to keep this fact in mind when considering donating to the pool.

A fee would be well-justified.

However, I think it's one of eligius' unique selling points to have no fee.

Therefore let me propose a way to encourage users to donate: We could put something like this

http://bitpoll.dyndns.org?poll=4 EDIT: according to luke-jr this is not needed, just normal donations. see http://eligius.st/~artefact2/ or http://bitpoll.dyndns.org?poll=2 for addresses.

on the stats page (at the top or in the middle). (note I used some of eligius' donation addresses here, namely the ones for "stats page" and "pool")

People *love* progress bars, they are really motivational.

So I'm offering my help in putting something like that on the stats-page (using javascript, iframe to my site, server-side or whatever is best)

how 'bout it, luke, wanna try this first, before you put a fee?

also: if you like the idea, even if you dont want this on your page(s)), can you please give me some addresses for the months (we could use 1RNUbHZwo2PmrEQiuX5ascLEXmtcFpooL for April)
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
FYI, after a week of testing on Europe, I have calculated that a patch I wrote decreases duplicate work by 0.7%. Given the current pool size of 60 GH/s, that means we now (once I apply it to the USA pool) accomplish a whole 420 MH/s extra than an unpatched bitcoind, or almost 1 BTC per day at the current difficulty. Even half of that, 0.50 BTC per day, would take only until the end of the current difficulty to cover the expense of the time I spent writing the patch.

In my mind, this would justify adding a long-term 0.7% "fee" to the pools, but I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to just publish the information and ask everyone to keep this fact in mind when considering donating to the pool.

If anyone would like to double-check my math, let me know and I'll setup an account for MySQL access. I started calculation from UNIX timestamp 1306000000 (about a week ago), but it should be safe to start as early as May 11th. During this time, Europe had the patches, but USA did not.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
Hi! I just wanted to extend a note of gratitude for the efforts of yourself and your collaborators on the Eligius pool. You've done well bootstrapping this thing and it appears to be polishing up and gaining support nicely.
Thanks. I also appreciate donations, as the pool's fee structure doesn't really cover expenses (it mainly exists to create numbers for testing). Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: