There was an evidence denial posted recently, so, I'm reposting the evidence (see above) which was never refuted.
The poster didn't use basic discussion principles, so I can't really respond other than trying to steer him back to the factual evidence under discussion.
I'm so glad you misused the term "
basic discussion principles" in your normal subterfuge.
Quick edit - forgot the link:
http://unrforliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Our-Discussion.jpgAgain, you can't simply introduce vocabulary that is bias and misleading while suggesting it is a standard of some sort. You've done this several times - even if I did believe you, I wouldn't want to agree with someone that was masking their own inadequacies, incorrectness or inability to understand with these behaviors unless they were able to support their ideas in a sophisticated and accurate manner.
The MaxPPS announcement was in a *HUGE* banner at the top of the status pages for each address. You missed it on your own negligence.
An example of your undeniable evidence that is very easy to disprove with the amount of effort equal to what I feel you are bothering to put in to resolving your own issue:
A possible reason "top hashers" on eligius are only there for a week? Because we are able to switch addresses and aren't bound to ridiculous logins. More realistically, and more factually, it is completely not true "top hashers" are leaving in droves after "being cheated":
http://eligius.st/~artefact2/Top 10 contributors have been there for... how long? Now you've walked yourself into a corner with your broad and scandalous statements that are easily disproved.... again.
If you're expecting me to chalkboard where you are incorrect in your assumptions of your balance - too bad. luke-jr has already stated what he (as the system designer - proof by attestation of a user with superior knowledge than either of us) that you are not owed the amount you claim. Had you been more civilized, it has already been stated he would be more than willing to immediately pay you out at that amount.
You can continue to throw around words like "cheat" and "scammer" as well as attempting to be condescending in the discussion.... You can continue to insist your evidence is undeniable while continuing to literally wrap it in bullshit.... do you know what that gets you? Do you realize what it has gotten you?
(hint: it's below this line)