Topic: 999Dice.com - Just Launched - 0.1% house edge, faucet & earn BTC - page 27. (Read 68135 times)

people saying things like seed hash etc cant be rigged, So can it be manipulated?  If so then what makes him different from the other dice sites.

I'm not sure, but the site seems rigged to me. Autobetting begins to act weird after a large number of rolls.

Was martingaling with 200 bets at a time for a small amount+fixed max bet (bot set to stop if max bet was reached) and it behaved normally for a while: either I won around 100x the stake (like it should be with 200 rolls at around 50% martingale) or I lose 2x the max bet I fixed (for example, if you set a 0.64 max bet you'll lose 0.01+0.02+0.04+0.08+0.16+0.32+0.64=1.3, roughly 2x max bet) on a death streak.

Was slowly recovering from a previous loss when suddenly, after many bets, I started to get the "you are betting to quickly" message (which is fine, I was indeed clicking too fast) and then the wins/losses began to screw up: I was either winning a very low amount (lower than the stake) or losing it (was always doing 200 autobets martingale with fixed max and stop loss), alternating, so that my balance was staying the same.
I didn't check the single bets manually (ofc, too many) but that behaviour was impossible with the parameters I set (as explained, you can either win x100 stake or lose 2x max bet with those settings).

I tried to log out and back in, and it fixed it for a while, then the weird behaviour started again soon after, even if I was clicking slowly and not getting any message. Logging out and in again wasn't doing shit this time, not even clearing the cookies or restarting the browser, nor the pc.

Then I started martingaling manually with a higher stake, after my 200 autobet sequence ended with some 10 losses in a row, and I got another 7 losses for a total of 17 in a row losing all my bankroll.

This is possible ofc (seen much longer streaks actually) and the bot problem could have been just a server software problem... so I'm not 100% sure, but surely the whole thing seems at least shady, all other circumstances considered.

Watch out.

We are still waiting for the 3000BTC proof.

Most likely a scam, unless he proves that he has the 3000 btc that he claims to have as a bank.

so is this site a scam or not?  someone mentioned it doesn't pay out

Probably is a 1.1% house edge.
Can't be 0.1%

I don't like it. even if it was 0 house edge I can't bet my favourite 0.1% of bets, sorry

A 0.10% house edge is incredibly dangerous for the operator, I would say unsustainable. This site can crash and burn quite fast. Especially with all the martingalers out there. You should proceed with quite the caution.

Yes he does. Their profits are way too high for 0.1% house edge. They just launched.

wow stunna has some balls. this is the biggest call out i;v seen in years

This site is vulnerable to persistent xss.  This would allow a malicious script to perform any action as any logged in user, to include betting and withdraws.  I would advise not using this site until this issue is fixed.

This type of advisory is typically handled in private, but due to the questionable reputation of the site operator, I feel it is more important to advise any potential users.  If the site operator would like to contact me directly, I can give more specific information.

I'm been informed that this problem is fixed.  I have no way to verify at the moment, but a quick test suggests that the problem has been fixed.

I logged into the site. Whats the deal exactly?

SCAM!!! THEY STOLE MY BITCOIN AFTER WITHDRAW!BTC

Go for it, also send me an explanation of how you can accept 400BTC profit wagers at a 0.1% edge and a "3000" btc bank.

Also a permalink won't be necessary, you claim to have receieved 100,000 coins in wagers in one day (1/3 of Pd's total), clearly you don't need any third party help.

Can't do that, but could sign a bunch of little addresses with that sum.  Will take me a little while to contact all people with investments.

In return, I want a perma-link on your site to mine, with an apology to boot =D

Wrd. Sign the address and I'll remove my trust rating.

People who know me, know I'm a big fan of competition. I had a strong suspicion last time and I didn't speak up until it was too late. If you aren't Noah/JakeMcrs it should be pretty easy for you to prove it to me if you want to.



Sign an address with 3000 coins on it and that should be sufficient proof.

WTF Stunna.  You're better than this.  Do you feel threatened??  

I'm not whoever those people are, and my site is nothing like theirs.  I've had zero complaints.  The site and its workings are transparent and verifiable.

Use with caution:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/confirmed-scammer-user-stake-services-bitticker-coinsafeio-999dice-376783


JakeM is likely JakeMcrs/stake etc. He's coded a few dicing sites prior so my money is on that, and his last account just got exposed for scamming.

Send me proof of your bank claimed: 3069 BTC  and I will remove negative trust on you.

Only 0.1% house edge dice game wow
And it's mobile friendly amazing..

You earn 50% of the house edge of every bet they make, whether they win or lose.

Here's some scenarios:

1 referral deposits 1 BTC, makes 1 bet for the whole thing, and cashes out or loses.
- You earn 1 BTC x 50% x 0.1% = 0.0005 BTC

1 referral deposits 1 BTC

• Bets 0.1 BTC and wins 0.1 BTC
• Bets 0.1 BTC and loses 0.1 BTC
• Repeats the above 100 times

- Total bets: 0.2 x 100 = 20 BTC (Even though he deposited only 1 BTC)
- You earn 20 BTC x 50% x 0.1% = 0.01 BTC

10000 referrals make no bets at all
- You earn nothing

If your referrrals are responsible collectively for 100,000 BTC of bets over the next year
- You earn 100000 BTC x 50% x 0.1% = 50 BTC
- 50 BTC / year is an average person's salary =D

Does that help clear things up for you?