Deleted from the moderated thread: I guess Ken is getting sensitive about his legal problems.
from: brianpbaker on February 15, 2014, 07:45:14 PM
from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:31:01 PM
from: JimmyJazz on February 13, 2014, 09:17:27 PM
Hello, is it likely we will be trading before the chips arrive in April?
I won't have an answer to that question until I meet with my securities lawyer.
I can't believe everyone is busy lobbing turds at each other while this is being overlooked. until we have access to our shares, literally no one in this thread has anything except Ken. I can't access my shares to sell or collect any imaginary dividends that might be paid out. We're told Crypto-Trade will be up and running soon, then ActM gets listed on CT but we still don't have OUR shares there, only Ukyo's that Ken is trying to sell cheap. We're told it's just a matter of getting the transfer script running so the shares can be logged on CT. Now's it seems that it MIGHT be April at the earliest that we can have access to our shares, and you guys are busy beating each other up over personal attacks and a product that may or may not ever even exist?
Who cares if the product exists or not if we can't even access our shares? Are you going to get dividends paid to thin air? Who are you going to divest your shares to if you think it's a scam now? Forget about being scammed on product development, guys. We all own NOTHING until we control our own shares again, and so far that seems to be the biggest hoodwink of all. The Crypto-Trade transfer needs to happen YESTERDAY. Pictures of vaporware are not worth getting upset over or excited over. They affect none of us unless we control our shares. As far as I can see, the only reason the transfer hasn't taken place is because Ken knows the trade price would instantly tank and make his company look like a sham and scare away any hope of even recouping costs, forget about turning a profit.
If anyone (particularly Ken) would care to clarify this delay, I would love to hear it. Until then, I don't even understand why any of you are focused on product. If you gave money to a company to make widgets and got a receipt promising you a portion of the revenue, what difference would it make how well the widgets performed if your ownership shares had disappeared into thin air? Our "investments" only exist in Ken's head at this point. Do you trust him to give them back to you? I'm not too sure anymore.
I can 100% guarantee you that no lawyer will ever advise a client to continue breaking the law. Ken will return from his lawyer to very sadly inform you all that he is unable to register your shares at crypto-trade. Actually it will be your lawyer as he will use your money to pay for the advice that screws your last chance of bailing out of this mess.
It's awfully convenient that this happens immediately after Ken raises another $100k or so for himself selling shares, don't you think?