[Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] - page 36.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: ?? on ??

What is your bet? Please submit a bet that will be approved by a third-party you lowlife scammer.

I'll let you set it up because you are a known liar and weasle so naturally you will bitch and moan about anything I set up.

Please put your money where your mouth is.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Bargraphics on January 10, 2014, 04:00:10 PM

Pankkake is now a known liar

Oh really?

You're not only a liar, you're a scammer - trying to extract money from customers when you knew damn well there were no products. See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/virtual-mining-corp-389343

My assumptions were correct.

Thank you for only affirming that you are indeed a liar.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: ?? on ??

4 ur edification:

there's no class action on this type of case
BG, are you not a shareholder?
Yes I'm a shareholder of an unregulated company in belize
well as you see i dont have any experience in these type of stuff but i'm willing to donate to get this started
the only people that have experience in this will not start it
I promise you
OK, why is that?
you have to literally understand you are putting good money after bad
to want to do this
so you would rather wait and see your money burn?
it's burned
completely and utterly burned

Completely. And utterly. The Slaughter clan thanks you for your patronage.

Uh, why would you expect kslaughter's accomplices to want any action against the company? They obviously have everything to lose.

Pankkake is now a known liar -

Since you are so keen on "betting" I would like to wager one that I am not kslaughter's "accomplice" in any way shape or form. I would also place a wager that I openly told people to seek legal action again the company if they wanted to. Might as well throw in a wager that I did in fact visit Terrahash as well.

Assumptions:
You will either decline and come up with an excuse as to why you are declining
You will not reply to this at all and continue trolling
I guarantee you will not accept any of these bets because you cannot "put your money where your mouth is".

Good day Madam.

babybonobo

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 250

#hardworkpaysoff

Stop with the lawsuit BS and scam BS. You guys have no basis, you just wish you could sell your shares because it's gettin' too hot for ya. Nobody except yourself is responsible for the shit that compresses out of your own diaper. Deal with the risk or don't play the game!

ffssixtynine

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Posted here as well in case it gets deleted elsewhere...

If ken said units had been delivered to customers, I think it's fair to say full evidence needs to be provided and a full explanation of what has gone wrong since then. You can't claim delivery and then say something obscure about rtl code (which was Ken's task?) and engineering (pcb). Similarly about the extra hashing.

I'm concerned that things went wrong in October or November and that it was then handled badly. At that point I seems to remember seeing irc logs posted showing a very stressed Ken. I have no reason to think this was anything other than failures internally and/or at outsourcers, but one must manage those failures professionally.

One must certainly not mislead customers or investors over the following months.

Ken, I know you have always meant well but this needs an open and frank explanation, very quickly indeed. Both shareholders and buyers have reason to be angry.

For everyone else, Ken is really poor at communication and a lot of this may be down to that. I always found him much better voice than in any written means. I know two posters here are trying to meet/chat to him.

somestranger

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Are You Shpongled?

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on January 10, 2014, 12:20:37 AM

He was not just "withholding information". He was lying about key points, as Vigil said. Please don't make us dig up his lies for the 100th time, do your homework.

Specifically that hardware was shipped when there is zero evidence to support that claim.

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

He was not just "withholding information". He was lying about key points, as Vigil said. Please don't make us dig up his lies for the 100th time, do your homework.

zefyr0s

sr. member

Activity: 245

Merit: 250

Withholding of information is for sure not lying, and I would make the argument that it isn't deceit either. This is a public forum in which an actual business is discussed. Any information that can come out can twisted, manipulated, and used against this company in any number of ways. You wouldn't expect Apple to converse with all of its shareholders in this manner would you? Laying out all their cards on the table, as such.

I'm not so much talking positive points here of Active, in fact I'm not happy with the current state of affairs here. Shit should be happening and I also would like to know more in detail about why it isn't. But I also know that shooting yourself in the foot makes it hard to walk sometimes.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: zefyr0s on January 10, 2014, 12:10:21 AM

If anything, you should be pointing to the lack of a forward-looking-statement disclaimer as the last post had. In this case I would agree that you could make the point that they didn't reach the goals they clearly stated they intended to achieve. But they didn't intentionally tell an untruth and they haven't stolen anything. Deceit well, is omission of some/many facts deceit?

Of course they did. Ken withheld key information from shareholders and lied/mislead on key facts surrounding ActM progress.

zefyr0s

sr. member

Activity: 245

Merit: 250

If anything, you should be pointing to the lack of a forward-looking-statement disclaimer as the last post had. In this case I would agree that you could make the point that they didn't reach the goals they clearly stated they intended to achieve. But they didn't intentionally tell an untruth and they haven't stolen anything. Deceit well, is omission of some/many facts deceit?

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: zefyr0s on January 10, 2014, 12:01:52 AM

Theft? Dude, what theft? There is a reason there is 'risk' with investing.

"Risk" would have been acceptable if we weren't robbed blind. Lies and deceit are not excused by common "risk". I'm sure there are prisoners who can explain that to you.

zefyr0s

sr. member

Activity: 245

Merit: 250

Theft? Dude, what theft? There is a reason there is 'risk' with investing.

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: zefyr0s on January 09, 2014, 11:56:43 PM

Hobby, when you call them can you record the conversation (make sure to let them know you are doing this!) I really want to hear how that goes. How you have to explain what bitcoin is, how mining works, the intricacies of getting mining solutions fab'd, created, shipped, etc. All the way until the end, just for them to say "There's no guarantee investors will ever make a profit backing any company. There is always a chance it will fail."

All they need to know is that Bitcoin was the method of transfer. Fiat went in, and fiat went out, and there was theft. Anything else relating to Bitcoin is hardly relevant.

zefyr0s

sr. member

Activity: 245

Merit: 250

Hobby, when you call them can you record the conversation (make sure to let them know you are doing this!) I really want to hear how that goes. How you have to explain what bitcoin is, how mining works, the intricacies of getting mining solutions fab'd, created, shipped, etc. All the way until the end, just for them to say "There's no guarantee investors will ever make a profit backing any company. There is always a chance it will fail."

hobbymd

sr. member

Activity: 259

Merit: 250

just a cross post

City of Springfield, MO
City Attorney

Civil Division
840 Boonville Avenue
Fifth Floor
Springfield, MO 65802
417.864.1645
email:[email protected]

Prosecutor's Division
625 North Benton Ave
Springfield, MO 65802
417.864.1892
417.864.2026 (fax)

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Rip-off Report

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/virtual-mining-corp/springfield-missouri-65802/virtual-mining-corp-vmc-ripoff-by-virtual-mining-corp-vmc-bitcoin-mining-company-spring-1107833

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

a friend of mine phoned that number and its Micah's grandmother. He was living with her at some point.

MilkyLep

hero member

Activity: 583

Merit: 500

Bitcoin for all & all for Bitcoin

Quote from: btct22 on January 09, 2014, 10:54:52 PM

Do you guys think this is still current?

Micah C Slaughter
25-29 years old

Phone number
417-823-9839

Address
1307 E Lakewood St
Springfield, MO 65804-7481

Well the number just keeps ringing...and ringing...not so easy to check the address where I'm at currently.

btct22

hero member

Activity: 615

Merit: 502

Do you guys think this is still current?

Micah C Slaughter
25-29 years old

Phone number
417-823-9839

Address
1307 E Lakewood St
Springfield, MO 65804-7481

somestranger

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Are You Shpongled?

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on January 09, 2014, 10:35:23 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on January 09, 2014, 09:10:32 PM

Quote from: Entropy-uc on January 09, 2014, 06:32:16 PM

This was an epic post. I think there's another one with even more outlandish profit projections in it.

Quote from: kslaughter on May 29, 2013, 09:25:41 PM

SPRINGFIELD, MO, – May 29, 2013 – VMC a manufacturer of the Fast-Hash Bitcoin Mining Machines has announced today that they will purchase a second full batch (10,000) of Avalon chips to build ~31 Fast-Hash-80's for AMC should AMC provide the capital in the next few weeks, this would bring AMC's machine total to ~71 units. The ~71 machines will bring the cooperatives hash power to ~5,650,816 MH/s, ~35,651 GH/s, or ~5.651 TH/s. At the current Difficulty (which may be more or less in the future) of 12,153,412 this will bring the estimated total revenue as of this writing to a total of $30,318.86 per day and a yearly amount of $8,681,346.78. Active Mining Corporation is a Vanuatu International Business Company DBA Active Mining Cooperative (AMC).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219636.0;topicseen

This extremely exaggerated projection completely wipes out any chance for Ken to explain to the judge "Look, I have 4 avalons running that produce $200/day!"
Previous scammers have lost their battle due to impossible projections like this to their shareholders/victims...

You might want to stop jumping up and down and screaming as Active Mining Corporation (Belize) has not made any projections at all. The shares to the company above are all owned by Active Mining Corporation (Belize).

Yeah like that is going to hold up in court...

Topic: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] - page 36. (Read 75954 times)