advertising confuses and creates only confusion, but certainly it is difficult to alienate
I disagree with your opinion. I believe that advertising is a very effective way to interest the public and succeed.
Topic: Advertising spam is not allowed - page 3. (Read 668106 times)
I disagree with your opinion. I believe that advertising is a very effective way to interest the public and succeed.
I know advertising is a form for trader to find investors and sometimes it can be spam because the approach of advertising is not true. So I have an idea that we should choose the good project to appear in our forum. We can make privacy to choose it.
I have some idea to prevent spam:
Implement SMAS to all campaign managers and must be managed by the moderators if an user listed to SMAS moderators can disable the signature of that user preventing the user from joining signature campaigns only problem is can moderators disable signature remotely? I think this more humane than giving negative feedback
Although giving users a negative feedback helps a lot against spamming and shitposting, the problem is, the feedback is harsh and also, the user given a negative trust by the DT user posts in reputation section pleading to remove their negative feedback or attacking the DT who gave him/her a negative feedback making more spam in reputation and Meta sections...
Implement SMAS to all campaign managers and must be managed by the moderators if an user listed to SMAS moderators can disable the signature of that user preventing the user from joining signature campaigns only problem is can moderators disable signature remotely? I think this more humane than giving negative feedback
Although giving users a negative feedback helps a lot against spamming and shitposting, the problem is, the feedback is harsh and also, the user given a negative trust by the DT user posts in reputation section pleading to remove their negative feedback or attacking the DT who gave him/her a negative feedback making more spam in reputation and Meta sections...
advertising confuses and creates only confusion, but certainly it is difficult to alienate
I disagree with your opinion. I believe that advertising is a very effective way to interest the public and succeed.
May I know if posting addition artwork after my coin has been listed on the ranking site is not against any rule or policy? The artwork is showing that "the coin is now available on xxx ranking sites!", some kind of that. I hope this is okay.
I tried several times to ask for information about it, in exchange I received only ban from Mr. Mprep.
I was one of those who published ads like the one you mentioned and I was (rightly?) banned.
Like me, others, but why does this continue to spam without any disturbance?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/stepan-1502204
Now Mr. Mprep will read this my post, banning me but the spam guy will continue to post.
Two weights and two measures
Such a long time, back in days, I think banning pools from advertising in threads is too harsh. There should be rules about how they are presented and how often they are posted maybe....
The ban was due to the fact that there are too many ads now. it already exceeds the required information, and advertising is not always worth the attention.
Such a long time, back in days, I think banning pools from advertising in threads is too harsh. There should be rules about how they are presented and how often they are posted maybe....
The ban was due to the fact that there are too many ads now. it already exceeds the required information, and advertising is not always worth the attention.
Such a long time, back in days, I think banning pools from advertising in threads is too harsh. There should be rules about how they are presented and how often they are posted maybe....
The ban was due to the fact that there are too many ads now. it already exceeds the required information, and advertising is not always worth the attention.
so, why is everyone doing it?
May I know if posting addition artwork after my coin has been listed on the ranking site is not against any rule or policy? The artwork is showing that "the coin is now available on xxx ranking sites!", some kind of that. I hope this is okay.
@Tony, thanks for your feedback. Let me be direct on my earlier comments. Graz.me is going thru our ico (ico.graz.me) (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.38758496). There are 3 different modes of advertisements. Above-the-line (ATL), BTL (Below-the-line), and On-the-line (OTL). Depending on the budget available, different companies will engage advertising differently. ATL specific programs are meant for awareness without much returns in mind, while BTL programs are more direct with returns in computation. OTL programs are more of a combination of ATL and BTL.
Depending on the marketing budgets available, different ICO companies will use different programs to reach the audience. Unfortunately, for Graz.me, we are more budget constraint, and we tend to use more of the BTL programs to justify our advertising campaigns with specific returns in mind. There are no right or wrong answers (in my humble opinion) to the advertisements and this all depends on the budget available.
Depending on the marketing budgets available, different ICO companies will use different programs to reach the audience. Unfortunately, for Graz.me, we are more budget constraint, and we tend to use more of the BTL programs to justify our advertising campaigns with specific returns in mind. There are no right or wrong answers (in my humble opinion) to the advertisements and this all depends on the budget available.
advertising confuses and creates only confusion, but certainly it is difficult to alienate
but advertising is a very effective way to inform people about certain information. and I do not think that advertising should be taken from everyday life and from the sphere of crippling goods.
As a coin issuer, advertising depends very much on the amount of available budget, but still we have to be careful of the awareness rather than utilization effect. This means, though awareness is good, but being unable to convert the ads into investment can be a potential waste of money. As an ICO company, we need to be very careful in our marketing expenditure. Unlike many other ICO companies that splurge in advertising dollars, we can't afford to do so, and likewise, spending too much of existing investors' money couldnt justify our means. So, I agree that limited advertising for awareness is good, but being able to draw investor's attention and investment is better. Ultimately, besides investors making money after the ICO event, the human cause of the ICO is also important. Because it is not just about technology and making money, running a good cause to improve human lives is one of the top reasons too.
advertising confuses and creates only confusion, but certainly it is difficult to alienate
I disagree with your opinion. I believe that advertising is a very effective way to interest the public and succeed.
Such a long time, back in days, I think banning pools from advertising in threads is too harsh. There should be rules about how they are presented and how often they are posted maybe....
Oh! Finally we can play games without spammers 
you say well, how cool would be to play without breaking for spammers!?!
Beware a guy called Robocop using fake accounts to promote himself, he's cheating a bunch of people and he also likes to insult 
Yes. I see a point here. However, it is through advertising that you describe new ICO's and other announcement. You may set restrictions to ads that are irrelevant to the topic. That would make more sense.
not understand 
What you do not understand. Please explain, we will help explain it to you. We help with pleasure. Oh! Finally we can play games without spammers
IMO Spammers or Scammers are everywhere, its very hard to get rid of them.Yes, this is true. Bitcoin ads rely on changing the spellings of the title to spam email.
Jump to: