Analysis - page 100. | Bitcointalksearch.org

RyNinDaCleM

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1009

Legen -wait for it- dary

Quote from: jamyr on November 23, 2016, 10:22:59 AM

Quote from: STT on November 19, 2016, 12:15:25 AM

Without volume the data is not significant. Calling a trend or analysis on a lack of trading seems a shot in the dark. Mostly I see people call out volume events such Trump surprise election, then they call a trend on the difference from the last big event/volume

Hello sir.

I am a bit new to bitcoin and your knowledge about this surely is superior compared to mine. With your word, does that mean that upon the 15m+ bitcoin, if a team or an organization who holds a large portion, for example 1 percent of the entire btc, have alts to trade with, can affect the price of btc entirely? If yes, is there a regulation in-the-making to avoid this. If no, then I think its better for the majority.

There are no regulations which govern, punish or avoid collusion nor price manipulation of Bitcoin.

fishpants

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

https://www.tradingview.com/i/xpxkxMzZ/
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/xpxkxMzZ-Bearish-divergences-on-daily/

CUT YOUR LOOSE!

jamyr

sr. member

Activity: 1764

Merit: 373

<------

Quote from: STT on November 19, 2016, 12:15:25 AM

Without volume the data is not significant. Calling a trend or analysis on a lack of trading seems a shot in the dark. Mostly I see people call out volume events such Trump surprise election, then they call a trend on the difference from the last big event/volume

Hello sir.

I am a bit new to bitcoin and your knowledge about this surely is superior compared to mine. With your word, does that mean that upon the 15m+ bitcoin, if a team or an organization who holds a large portion, for example 1 percent of the entire btc, have alts to trade with, can affect the price of btc entirely? If yes, is there a regulation in-the-making to avoid this. If no, then I think its better for the majority.

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: hdbuck on November 23, 2016, 02:58:19 AM

hey spammers, could you just stop bumping this thread? been over 6 pages of shitty freeloading now. thank you. ffs.

plz stop spamming. thx.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

hey spammers, could you just stop bumping this thread? been over 6 pages of shitty freeloading now. thank you. ffs.

davidorentol

full member

Activity: 144

Merit: 100

I dont know triangle prediction is still valid or not, byt we may shot "cup and handle" any time now.
The question is ,at what numbers ? that is why i ask for clarification.

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: davidorentol on November 22, 2016, 12:48:58 PM

Quote from: ImI on November 22, 2016, 12:23:22 PM

What cup-and-handle?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16207136

What happend to the triangle prediction?

davidorentol

full member

Activity: 144

Merit: 100

Quote from: ImI on November 22, 2016, 12:23:22 PM

What cup-and-handle?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16207136

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: podyx on November 09, 2016, 08:27:51 AM

Quote from: wpalczynski on November 01, 2016, 06:14:29 PM

According to MasterLuc this is where we stop and bleed off to approx 580 in early January. He's been right so many times, if Bitcoin does this Ill be blown away.

Looks like this may be in the works?

nope.

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

What cup-and-handle? Afaik Luc's prediction was a big triangle well into 2017.

davidorentol

full member

Activity: 144

Merit: 100

i'm a little confused.At what weekly close price, we can assume that cup and handle pattern is activated at different exchanges?

for example:

778$ Stamp?
789$ Bitfinex?
696 euro Kraken?
5180 yuan Huobi?

Are my numbers correct ?

BlackPanda

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1001

Quote from: STT on November 19, 2016, 12:15:25 AM

Without volume the data is not significant. Calling a trend or analysis on a lack of trading seems a shot in the dark. Mostly I see people call out volume events such Trump surprise election, then they call a trend on the difference from the last big event/volume

transaction volume is now quite a lot. I think that the more demand factors make bitcoin price increases. while the effect trumpt not answer the rising price of bitcoin today. bitcoin price increase affects all things that exist in the world today.

iqlimasyadiqa

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1011

bitcoin price movements were fantastic. increase happened so fast. bitcoin increasingly demand a lot of people and also current bitcoin transaction volume demand is very high.

Kramerc

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: STT on November 19, 2016, 12:15:25 AM

Without volume the data is not significant. Calling a trend or analysis on a lack of trading seems a shot in the dark. Mostly I see people call out volume events such Trump surprise election, then they call a trend on the difference from the last big event/volume

Maybe this way my point is easier to understand.

STT

legendary

Activity: 4060

Merit: 1448

Without volume the data is not significant. Calling a trend or analysis on a lack of trading seems a shot in the dark. Mostly I see people call out volume events such Trump surprise election, then they call a trend on the difference from the last big event/volume

Kramerc

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: STT on November 18, 2016, 08:27:59 AM

Quote from: Kramerc on November 16, 2016, 11:03:10 AM

Actually, imo, triangle has never been valid. Triangles only correct, on low to no volume at all. They don't trend, which is what bitcoin's been doing lately, which is easy to see if you're looking at the volume profiles.

I wonder how this works because its only with volume confidence in the data is there. Obviously if 1 sale occurs at 100 and 500 sales occur at 800 even if the low price was the most recent we can be fairly sure that 800 is still the most significant price. Drawing the conclusions from the periods of lower volume would break from chart analysis Ive seen done previously

I honestly don't understand what you meant to say. Could you maybe rephrase?

STT

legendary

Activity: 4060

Merit: 1448

Quote from: Kramerc on November 16, 2016, 11:03:10 AM

Actually, imo, triangle has never been valid. Triangles only correct, on low to no volume at all. They don't trend, which is what bitcoin's been doing lately, which is easy to see if you're looking at the volume profiles.

I wonder how this works because its only with volume confidence in the data is there. Obviously if 1 sale occurs at 100 and 500 sales occur at 800 even if the low price was the most recent we can be fairly sure that 800 is still the most significant price. Drawing the conclusions from the periods of lower volume would break from chart analysis Ive seen done previously

secousa

full member

Activity: 203

Merit: 151