I think Luc gave an update on tradingview:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
That Lucs user account?
Yes.
Topic: Analysis - page 101. (Read 941567 times)
That Lucs user account?
Yes.
I think Luc gave an update on tradingview:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
]https://i.imgur.com/aMbPukI.jpg[/img]
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
]https://i.imgur.com/aMbPukI.jpg[/img]
That Lucs user account?
I think Luc gave an update on tradingview:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
Linear scale, really ?
so no more triangle i guess
I think Luc gave an update on tradingview:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/g9n4rJ0L-The-way-coup-and-handle-can-break-up/
triangle still valid on US exchanges, technically its a triple top
Actually, imo, triangle has never been valid. Triangles only correct, on low to no volume at all. They don't trend, which is what bitcoin's been doing lately, which is easy to see if you're looking at the volume profiles.
triangle still valid on US exchanges, technically its a triple top
true, but doesnt matter cause we have basically two predictions from Luc. one says big triangle well into 2017 and one says big move to 1000$+. so whatever happens everybody will be cheering. even if we fall to 450$ you could still argue that its just part of the big triangle.
triangle still valid on US exchanges, technically its a triple top
I invoke the master
Good evening.
My presumption because of the result of the US Presidential election is that in this next 4 years, specifically next year, there will be a big blow, a mock blow from who-knows-where and then a big hop. Over the past 3-4 years, China had grown even more. Yes they are the new Super Power(I never heard of them bragging about it though). Chinese players, investors, bankers, etc., will then manipulate the prices. This, together with the new age of robotics(just saw one on the news recently but cant remember the exact date), would be a perfect combination. Imagine them sending their robo-pets to fetch some goods from the market, surely they will not let it carry cold cash.
Sorry for those who feel that I am dreaming, I wish I am, Trump as US president is the worst part of this gen. Thank you.
((basically, with the trend, I am feeling of a big slope down, then a wall straight up.))
My presumption because of the result of the US Presidential election is that in this next 4 years, specifically next year, there will be a big blow, a mock blow from who-knows-where and then a big hop. Over the past 3-4 years, China had grown even more. Yes they are the new Super Power(I never heard of them bragging about it though). Chinese players, investors, bankers, etc., will then manipulate the prices. This, together with the new age of robotics(just saw one on the news recently but cant remember the exact date), would be a perfect combination. Imagine them sending their robo-pets to fetch some goods from the market, surely they will not let it carry cold cash.
Sorry for those who feel that I am dreaming, I wish I am, Trump as US president is the worst part of this gen. Thank you.
((basically, with the trend, I am feeling of a big slope down, then a wall straight up.))
That triangle is way over reaching on speculating a trend off two points. I think it must be a declining triangle, constricted gradually into breakout. No point calling it exactly till its in effect and confirmed the breakout then you can buy the momentum upwards. Unfortunately its way too common to jump the gun and buy into the triangle hoping its correct and its never confirmed, goes down or sideways
Please don't decrease the quality of this thread
That triangle is way over reaching on speculating a trend off two points. I think it must be a declining triangle, constricted gradually into breakout. No point calling it exactly till its in effect and confirmed the breakout then you can buy the momentum upwards. Unfortunately its way too common to jump the gun and buy into the triangle hoping its correct and its never confirmed, goes down or sideways
Update from the Master? ...
Can't waiting for the price are reach $1000. I very sure that this will happen in this year. So, best strategy is buying and hold bitcoin.
Chess nut has also been wrong on some occassions. I like his thread and forecasts. he has a high % call ratio, but has been wrong on some occassions.
This is the whole reason why i started the Nights Watch thread. When you look at all the best/great charts out there, yo get a clear(er) picture of where price is headed.
This is the whole reason why i started the Nights Watch thread. When you look at all the best/great charts out there, yo get a clear(er) picture of where price is headed.
"nights watch thread" <- what is that?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161207.1280
According to MasterLuc this is where we stop and bleed off to approx 580 in early January. He's been right so many times, if Bitcoin does this Ill be blown away.
Looks like this may be in the works?
Not really his EW based prediction though right?
to me it looks like EW, but i am no expert on EW. so maybe i am wrong here.
that's his chart. He's trying to forecast price using a mix of EW and quantitative analysis (on historical volatility)
so, like i said, there are two predictions out there. one says big triangle that reaches well into 2017 and one says we start a nice rally from this point.
just trying to clarify what's the consensus.
You are right, seems that's all what we've got for the moment.
we're going up.
Luc was right about going up *eventually*
but he got the pattern wrong. no giant triangle consolidation this time.
Luc was right about going up *eventually*
but he got the pattern wrong. no giant triangle consolidation this time.
also chessnut seems to agree about the fact we are not going up:
...
This downside move was an impulse and it's broken some important levels. big time sideways should follow, downside risk is higher now
[img width=500]https://www.tradingview.com/x/ubpA7KJV/
This downside move was an impulse and it's broken some important levels. big time sideways should follow, downside risk is higher now
[img width=500]https://www.tradingview.com/x/ubpA7KJV/
Chess nut has also been wrong on some occassions. I like his thread and forecasts. he has a high % call ratio, but has been wrong on some occassions.
This is the whole reason why i started the Nights Watch thread. When you look at all the best/great charts out there, yo get a clear(er) picture of where price is headed.
we're going up.
Luc was right about going up *eventually*
but he got the pattern wrong. no giant triangle consolidation this time.
Luc was right about going up *eventually*
but he got the pattern wrong. no giant triangle consolidation this time.
also chessnut seems to agree about the fact we are not going up:
...
This downside move was an impulse and it's broken some important levels. big time sideways should follow, downside risk is higher now
This downside move was an impulse and it's broken some important levels. big time sideways should follow, downside risk is higher now
its a temporary move down. Could go as low as $650, but its all the way up after that
Jump to: