and fake volumes.
Maybe. But that's like saying 'willy drove price to ~1200'. Might be true, but price still got there (briefly
). 
Topic: Analysis - page 228. (Read 941563 times)
Maybe. But that's like saying 'willy drove price to ~1200'. Might be true, but price still got there (briefly
).
are we finally in bull?
That is like a 30 second chart, here's actually what's happening http://imgur.com/Hf3AcQ6,piL7U3L#1 you're welcome lol
and fake volumes.
Maybe. But that's like saying 'willy drove price to ~1200'. Might be true, but price still got there (briefly
). This $1200 spike wasnt willy, nor some conspiracy. It was just Tibanne screwing with Mark's keyboard whilst he was out on some frapuccino quest.
and fake volumes.
Maybe. But that's like saying 'willy drove price to ~1200'. Might be true, but price still got there (briefly
). and fake volumes.
If you are still in this 1y+ denial about that, you should stop trading. Really.
It's clear you haven't dip a toe in the water and tested by yourself. Leading to the fact the volume are existing and your owns order are displayed and added to it. But it's easier to tell "it's fake"...
PS: It's known that most (futures) exchanges take into account 2 times the volume: http://www.coindesk.com/asian-exchanges-adopt-controversial-counting-method-futures-trades/
hey alright i was just teasing.. ^^
be assured im not pretending to trade this wave. im just waiting for the big one to then take a dump at lucif's bear-ing point.
Although i must say i would have buy more if it went sub300, but i guess i have enough by now.
choochoo it is.
and fake volumes.
If you are still in this 1y+ denial about that, you should stop trading. Really.
It's clear you haven't dip a toe in the water and tested by yourself. Leading to the fact the volume are existing and your owns order are displayed and added to it. But it's easier to tell "it's fake"...
PS: It's known that most (futures) exchanges take into account 2 times the volume: http://www.coindesk.com/asian-exchanges-adopt-controversial-counting-method-futures-trades/
and fake volumes.
Maybe. But that's like saying 'willy drove price to ~1200'. Might be true, but price still got there (briefly
). My words explained in short term
Nice visual summary, thanks. I have a preference for what I'd like to see, but I appreciate your analysis, as always. One thing : I like the current volume. It's, imo, the strongest argument in favor of upwards breakout.
Agreed. That and China is leading with some force.
and fake volumes.
My words explained in short term
Nice visual summary, thanks. I have a preference for what I'd like to see, but I appreciate your analysis, as always. One thing : I like the current volume. It's, imo, the strongest argument in favor of upwards breakout.
Agreed. That and China is leading with some force.
My words explained in short term
Nice visual summary, thanks. I have a preference for what I'd like to see, but I appreciate your analysis, as always. One thing : I like the current volume. It's, imo, the strongest argument in favor of upwards breakout.
My words explained in short term
Odds are 40% for 420 broken and then 500 reached.
60% for incomplete impulse down from 680 will continue after triangle (triangle not formed well yet)
60% for incomplete impulse down from 680 will continue after triangle (triangle not formed well yet)
Market changes quick. Way to 500 will mean reversal. My estimated odds are about 40%. It should realize if 420 lower high will be broken to upside.
Most preferable count for me now I posted above. 60%.
Most preferable count for me now I posted above. 60%.
master, you are an oracle. i have been following your posts for a long time. but i dont always understand what you say (combination of me not being TA expert, english not being your first language). can somebody possibly translate this?
is he saying if we go to 500 we would immediately see a reversal in price? if 420 is broken, then we see 500? odds are 40% of what happening?
Market changes quick. Way to 500 will mean reversal. My estimated odds are about 40%. It should realize if 420 lower high will be broken to upside.
Most preferable count for me now I posted above. 60%.
Most preferable count for me now I posted above. 60%.
Sect.
what happened with
Wake me up at 500, I'll post next analysis.
What is your last predriction ,500 or 200 ?
or maybe 50 or 1599? 
No, lucif said only a rise above 500 would invalidate the current count that leads to the ~200 low.
No,lucif said Wake me up at 500
Yes, but you ripped that quote out of its context. Read the few pages before your quote and enlightenment will shine upon thee.
what happened with
Wake me up at 500, I'll post next analysis.
What is your last predriction ,500 or 200 ?
or maybe 50 or 1599? No, lucif said only a rise above 500 would invalidate the current count that leads to the ~200 low.
No,lucif said Wake me up at 500
what happened with
Wake me up at 500, I'll post next analysis.
What is your last predriction ,500 or 200 ?
or maybe 50 or 1599? No, lucif said only a rise above 500 would invalidate the current count that leads to the ~200 low.
local top
Jump to: