65 TDP
+100 Core
+600 Mem
39.2 MH/s
51 Hours stable
https://imgur.com/3kuwS0F
https://i.imgur.com/3kuwS0F.png
+100 Core
+600 Mem
39.2 MH/s
51 Hours stable
https://imgur.com/3kuwS0F
https://i.imgur.com/3kuwS0F.png
thats a 1080 I'm guessing?
Topic: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener - page 9. (Read 59500 times)
thats a 1080 I'm guessing?
I am on Ubuntu 18 and the Zotac 1080 Ti gets around 38 Mhs.
It is probably due to the fact that I cannot set to P0 as when I OC it falls back to P2. Running on nVidia driver 396.
Anyone has a solution for this issue?
It is probably due to the fact that I cannot set to P0 as when I OC it falls back to P2. Running on nVidia driver 396.
Anyone has a solution for this issue?
wow no dev fee
65 TDP
+100 Core
+600 Mem
39.2 MH/s
51 Hours stable
https://imgur.com/3kuwS0F
https://i.imgur.com/3kuwS0F.png
+100 Core
+600 Mem
39.2 MH/s
51 Hours stable
https://imgur.com/3kuwS0F
https://i.imgur.com/3kuwS0F.png
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
is that +65% power aka 165% TDP? or 65% of TDP (aka -35%)?
I don't think any pascal GPU allows 165% TDP.
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
is that +65% power aka 165% TDP? or 65% of TDP (aka -35%)?
How does this work for Neoscrypt or X16S?
https://s22.postimg.cc/tepqkvu41/Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_10.27.52.png
https://imgur.com/OwLYP6T
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80 should be 70%
Core +150 should be 100
Memory +750 should be 600
https://imgur.com/OwLYP6T
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80 should be 70%
Core +150 should be 100
Memory +750 should be 600
and the numbers suck your card does not respond very well at all to the pill bro.
why bro i think that it is a very good result for GTX1080 because without pill i got 25 MH/s
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80 should be 70%
Core +150 should be 100
Memory +750 should be 600
and the numbers suck your card does not respond very well at all to the pill bro.
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80 should be 70%
Core +150 should be 100
Memory +750 should be 600
and the numbers suck your card does not respond very well at all to the pill bro.
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80
Core +150
Memory +750
I think that around +600 memory is the upper limit which will be stable. Then again, it depends on the card, I'm using EVGA's FTW3 edition.
https://s22.postimg.cc/tepqkvu41/Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_10.27.52.png
https://imgur.com/OwLYP6T
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80
Core +150
Memory +750
https://imgur.com/OwLYP6T
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X
38.5MH/s
Power +65
Core +150
Memory +500
and it is very stable
40.9MH/s
Not stable
Power +80
Core +150
Memory +750
is there a paid version available for 1070?
nope
1080's
is there a paid version available for 1070?
Nope. It's at 80%
Try 65%, i get 52-53 with only 65% power. Saves cost.
I found some interesting results playing with the clocks.
On the MEM clock it seems to be a waveform, per se
On my setup, I would get say.... 52 at 750 but if I increase it just a bit to say 800 I get 53
- then increase it a bit more to 825 and it drops back to 52
- increase more to about 875 and I get 54
- more MEM to around 900 and it drops to 52
- kick it up to 925 and I get 55
- but go to 965 and it drops back to 52 - wtf?
- then finally 975 and I get 96.2 and soon after there is a crash
- >> the above numbers are approximate and should be adjusted for your machine
Mine was performed on a 1080Ti FE 11GB
And the CORE clock seems to do better as a slightly NEG #, overall
On the MEM clock it seems to be a waveform, per se
On my setup, I would get say.... 52 at 750 but if I increase it just a bit to say 800 I get 53
- then increase it a bit more to 825 and it drops back to 52
- increase more to about 875 and I get 54
- more MEM to around 900 and it drops to 52
- kick it up to 925 and I get 55
- but go to 965 and it drops back to 52 - wtf?
- then finally 975 and I get 96.2 and soon after there is a crash
- >> the above numbers are approximate and should be adjusted for your machine
Mine was performed on a 1080Ti FE 11GB
And the CORE clock seems to do better as a slightly NEG #, overall
Check sustained hashrates and not spikes. Sample period needs to be consistent and large.
My Gaming X acts very weird. Needs 240W power limit (while actually drawing 180W) and a negative clock offset to reach proper hashrate. Changing the clock has no effect until a miner restart.
Would a newer BIOS fix this?
Would a newer BIOS fix this?
I found some interesting results playing with the clocks.
On the MEM clock it seems to be a waveform, per se
On my setup, I would get say.... 52 at 750 but if I increase it just a bit to say 800 I get 53
- then increase it a bit more to 825 and it drops back to 52
- increase more to about 875 and I get 54
- more MEM to around 900 and it drops to 52
- kick it up to 925 and I get 55
- but go to 965 and it drops back to 52 - wtf?
- then finally 975 and I get 96.2 and soon after there is a crash
- >> the above numbers are approximate and should be adjusted for your machine
Mine was performed on a 1080Ti FE 11GB
And the CORE clock seems to do better as a slightly NEG #, overall
Every gtx 1080 ti has a personal settings - even the same Trademarks has a different mem clock. Could you, please, get the concrete values by AB? On the MEM clock it seems to be a waveform, per se
On my setup, I would get say.... 52 at 750 but if I increase it just a bit to say 800 I get 53
- then increase it a bit more to 825 and it drops back to 52
- increase more to about 875 and I get 54
- more MEM to around 900 and it drops to 52
- kick it up to 925 and I get 55
- but go to 965 and it drops back to 52 - wtf?
- then finally 975 and I get 96.2 and soon after there is a crash
- >> the above numbers are approximate and should be adjusted for your machine
Mine was performed on a 1080Ti FE 11GB
And the CORE clock seems to do better as a slightly NEG #, overall
It crashes at every algo switch, regardless of the OC settings.
yeah my rigs are only vaguely stable with the way my overclocks are set and with the pill. even just a brief network blip to the pool server and re-connection will crash a couple of my rigs, and I could forget about doing any kind of pool/algo switching on them. so I just point them at eth and reboot every few hours :-/
I can't make it work with NH, I see others had similar issue.
If I only enable Daggerhashimoto, it works fine, but that kind of defeats the whole purpose of NH. So it's good for mining directly, but what am I doing wrong on NH? It crashes at every algo switch, regardless of the OC settings. Crashes with core OC too, negative OC too.
If I only enable Daggerhashimoto, it works fine, but that kind of defeats the whole purpose of NH. So it's good for mining directly, but what am I doing wrong on NH? It crashes at every algo switch, regardless of the OC settings. Crashes with core OC too, negative OC too.
In theory the 33 to 50 boost on a 1080ti should be better then any switching.
I simply set to the 1 algo Daggerhashimoto and take the boost.
My 1080ti's are earning 50% more and power use is very close to the same.
here are 2x 1080ti's and a ryzen 2700 pulling 500 watts at 12 kwatts a day at 10 cents it is $1.20 in power at 20 cents it is $2.40 in power
https://www.nicehash.com/miner/146UJM5kgzLVUV23CXCf33KQKHckoX1gx3
so 4.20 - 1.20 = 3.00 a day profit
or 4.20 - 2.40 = 1.80 a day profit
gear is paid off so it is easy peasy
Jump to: