I just noticed following feature with my GTX1080TI.
Without ETH pill:Mining software running with 1885MHz core clock.Everything OK.
With ETH pill: Mining software running with max. 1180 MHz core clock.
What might cause this?
Topic: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener - page 5. (Read 59500 times)
https://github.com/Virosa/ETHlargementPill
I updated OP so people that still wishes to download it can find it more easily.
I updated OP so people that still wishes to download it can find it more easily.
Someone can provide another link?
If you wish, you may download ETH Enlargment pill here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UfFRQ_0t3N8QLjFtpvuzE8sao1dMzVeY
Someone can provide another link?
Unfortunately, links on Github to the ETHlargement Pill in the beginning of this thread are not working.
I believe they were taken down by the main contributor to the project, per their internal disagreements
Unfortunately, links on Github to the ETHlargement Pill in the beginning of this thread are not working.
I don’t think anyone is talking about a new pill being created. They are talking about using the existing pill for the GDDR5X 1060, since the pill works on GDDR5X cards.
It’s a reasonable curiosity. Someone will just have to get one and try it out.
It’s a reasonable curiosity. Someone will just have to get one and try it out.
The pill searches for specific chips, so if it wasn't explicitly supported, it won't activate for that card.
I don’t think anyone is talking about a new pill being created. They are talking about using the existing pill for the GDDR5X 1060, since the pill works on GDDR5X cards.
It’s a reasonable curiosity. Someone will just have to get one and try it out.
It’s a reasonable curiosity. Someone will just have to get one and try it out.
I tried with ETH Enlargment pill with Phoenix miner - it doesn't work. On x16r it doesn't work as well. But it works perfectly with Claymore miner while Ether mining.
And I'm using Ethminer (0.17 rc2) because I don't want to support Claymore, I didn't like his attitude in some of his posts and he has given up on new updates, at least for public usage.
Ethminer hashes at 57 MH/s, that's the pool's side average.
Do you think Ethminer faster than Phoenix miner?
ETHminer is not faster than Phoenix and depends on card. I noticed a 7mh/s uplift on my total hashrate when using UBQHASH's Ethminer vs Phoenix miners on my GTX 1060 3GB. Mining new UBQhash algo.
Now that 1060 is coming out with GDDR5X could the pill possible work for those? I meant we could see 28-32mh/s 1060s! consuming 75w!
THE GTX 1060 IS AT END-OF-DEVELOPMENT--
Where did you read that any new 1060 was being released? The Green Team (nVidia) is moving to RTX 2060 (perhaps), but has released only RTX 2080ti, 2080, and 2070 cards.
Further, the developer of the Pill has moved on to other things. There will likely be no new Pill. --scryptr
where have you been? the 1060 GDDR5X was recently released and widely talked about. a simple google search would answer your questions.
I HAD MY FILL OF GTX 1060--
But apparently, back in October, some nVidia manufacturers released a Frankenstein with a 1070 cutdown chip mated with GDDR5X memory. It exists, but that does not mean any of the Wolf+Girl team will develop a Pill to cure the ill. Talk is that their team is up to their neck in trouble over some other developments. Rumor is also that they used leaked memory code for the Pill.
I have more 1060 cards than I can use, and did not read about the Green Team Frankenstein until pointed at it. Apologies, but I never got my hands on a 4GB 750ti, either. It existed. I still mine with 750ti cards, they are still profitable, and need no pill. --scryptr
I tried with ETH Enlargment pill with Phoenix miner - it doesn't work. On x16r it doesn't work as well. But it works perfectly with Claymore miner while Ether mining.
And I'm using Ethminer (0.17 rc2) because I don't want to support Claymore, I didn't like his attitude in some of his posts and he has given up on new updates, at least for public usage.
Ethminer hashes at 57 MH/s, that's the pool's side average.
Do you think Ethminer faster than Phoenix miner?
ETHminer is not faster than Phoenix and depends on card. I noticed a 7mh/s uplift on my total hashrate when using UBQHASH's Ethminer vs Phoenix miners on my GTX 1060 3GB. Mining new UBQhash algo.
Now that 1060 is coming out with GDDR5X could the pill possible work for those? I meant we could see 28-32mh/s 1060s! consuming 75w!
THE GTX 1060 IS AT END-OF-DEVELOPMENT--
Where did you read that any new 1060 was being released? The Green Team (nVidia) is moving to RTX 2060 (perhaps), but has released only RTX 2080ti, 2080, and 2070 cards.
Further, the developer of the Pill has moved on to other things. There will likely be no new Pill. --scryptr
where have you been? the 1060 GDDR5X was recently released and widely talked about. a simple google search would answer your questions.
I tried with ETH Enlargment pill with Phoenix miner - it doesn't work. On x16r it doesn't work as well. But it works perfectly with Claymore miner while Ether mining.
And I'm using Ethminer (0.17 rc2) because I don't want to support Claymore, I didn't like his attitude in some of his posts and he has given up on new updates, at least for public usage.
Ethminer hashes at 57 MH/s, that's the pool's side average.
Do you think Ethminer faster than Phoenix miner?
ETHminer is not faster than Phoenix and depends on card. I noticed a 7mh/s uplift on my total hashrate when using UBQHASH's Ethminer vs Phoenix miners on my GTX 1060 3GB. Mining new UBQhash algo.
Now that 1060 is coming out with GDDR5X could the pill possible work for those? I meant we could see 28-32mh/s 1060s! consuming 75w!
THE GTX 1060 IS AT END-OF-DEVELOPMENT--
Where did you read that any new 1060 was being released? The Green Team (nVidia) is moving to RTX 2060 (perhaps), but has released only RTX 2080ti, 2080, and 2070 cards.
Further, the developer of the Pill has moved on to other things. There will likely be no new Pill. --scryptr
I tried with ETH Enlargment pill with Phoenix miner - it doesn't work. On x16r it doesn't work as well. But it works perfectly with Claymore miner while Ether mining.
And I'm using Ethminer (0.17 rc2) because I don't want to support Claymore, I didn't like his attitude in some of his posts and he has given up on new updates, at least for public usage.
Ethminer hashes at 57 MH/s, that's the pool's side average.
Do you think Ethminer faster than Phoenix miner?
ETHminer is not faster than Phoenix and depends on card. I noticed a 7mh/s uplift on my total hashrate when using UBQHASH's Ethminer vs Phoenix miners on my GTX 1060 3GB. Mining new UBQhash algo.
Now that 1060 is coming out with GDDR5X could the pill possible work for those? I meant we could see 28-32mh/s 1060s! consuming 75w!
It's not that it doesn't work on x16r, it's that it's not needed, as the algo is hardly stressing the memory.
The pill is about memory timings, nothing to do with the cuda cores or other computing stuff.
The pill is about memory timings, nothing to do with the cuda cores or other computing stuff.
I tried with ETH Enlargment pill with Phoenix miner - it doesn't work. On x16r it doesn't work as well. But it works perfectly with Claymore miner while Ether mining.
And I'm using Ethminer (0.17 rc2) because I don't want to support Claymore, I didn't like his attitude in some of his posts and he has given up on new updates, at least for public usage.
Ethminer hashes at 57 MH/s, that's the pool's side average.
Do you think Ethminer faster than Phoenix miner?
I tried with ETH Enlargment pill with Phoenix miner - it doesn't work. On x16r it doesn't work as well. But it works perfectly with Claymore miner while Ether mining.
And I'm using Ethminer (0.17 rc2) because I don't want to support Claymore, I didn't like his attitude in some of his posts and he has given up on new updates, at least for public usage.
Ethminer hashes at 57 MH/s, that's the pool's side average.
we need a pill (optimized memory timings) for X22i algo.
CRYPTO-MINING NEEDS A PILL--
The market is a shade away from being futile.
But seriously, I thought the chain-type algos (x16r, x16s, x22i, etc) were mostly processor bound, and high energy. How would a blanket memory timing help over various chained algorithms? --scryptr
some of these algos are memory reliant, it would increase the overall hash-rate.
CORE-INTENSIVE ALGOS MAY PERFORM POORLY--
The pill works for ETH by design, and helps with Monero variants, but some algos like ProgPow perform poorly with the Pill. With the chained algos, the pill would need to detect which algo is being mined and switch ON or OFF accordingly. This may not be practical to code.
If the algo's performance is neutral to the pill, it could remain active. I game with the Pill, and mine Monero after gaming. The Pill just runs, with no problems detected. I don't code enough to actually know what is possible. --scryptr
Sorry for this question...
I have a rig mixed with 1080's and 1070's. How can I exclude the 1070's, so the pill only runs with the 1080's?
Tried with the --revA 1,5,... But didn't worked
I have a rig mixed with 1080's and 1070's. How can I exclude the 1070's, so the pill only runs with the 1080's?
Tried with the --revA 1,5,... But didn't worked
JUST RUN IT--
It only affects the 1080 cards. There is no need for any command line flags. The Pill will not affect the 1070 cards. --scryptr
Sorry for this question...
I have a rig mixed with 1080's and 1070's. How can I exclude the 1070's, so the pill only runs with the 1080's?
Tried with the --revA 1,5,... But didn't worked
I have a rig mixed with 1080's and 1070's. How can I exclude the 1070's, so the pill only runs with the 1080's?
Tried with the --revA 1,5,... But didn't worked
we need a pill (optimized memory timings) for X22i algo.
CRYPTO-MINING NEEDS A PILL--
The market is a shade away from being futile.
But seriously, I thought the chain-type algos (x16r, x16s, x22i, etc) were mostly processor bound, and high energy. How would a blanket memory timing help over various chained algorithms? --scryptr
some of these algos are memory reliant, it would increase the overall hash-rate.
CORE-INTENSIVE ALGOS MAY PERFORM POORLY--
The pill works for ETH by design, and helps with Monero variants, but some algos like ProgPow perform poorly with the Pill. With the chained algos, the pill would need to detect which algo is being mined and switch ON or OFF accordingly. This may not be practical to code.
If the algo's performance is neutral to the pill, it could remain active. I game with the Pill, and mine Monero after gaming. The Pill just runs, with no problems detected. I don't code enough to actually know what is possible. --scryptr
This works with Monero as well on 1080ti.
Jump to: