from that discussions on reddit r/Aeon, stoffu and smooth have realized a well functioning blockchain.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/pyinjs/aeon_question/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/q0yjg7/aeon/
a pity that it is not recognized sufficiently by people, or after marketing.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/pyinjs/aeon_question/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Aeon/comments/q0yjg7/aeon/
a pity that it is not recognized sufficiently by people, or after marketing.
Aeon is not a bad coin so why worry? It is natural evolution for any organization. Hell even the US of A had to change the flag a few times before it stuck. You don't always get everything right the first time. Good branding can help attract more people to using aeon and building the aeon economy. Stoffu and smooth are programmers and of course they think aeon is a good coin because they helped developed it but not everyone can understand why Aeon is technically a good coin. If they see good branding they might say "oh, what is this coin, I have never heard of Aeon?" Then they can learn more about the history and culture of aeon and maybe they will stay around for awhile. Building a decentralized peer-to-peer network is not just about writing good code. The stubbornness of this community towards branding is weird and cult-like. You can release new versions of the code every year, but never improve the branding? In this time nothing seems more important than attracting more users to the network. The code is practically in a future proof state. Why not lend a little bit of time to improving some of the other ignored aspects of the peer-to-peer network? Anyways, just some thoughts on the matter, thanks for reading.
