Topic: [ANN] [ARO] | Arionum | CPU+GPU+Masternode | PHP Based |Decentralized Revolution - page 88. (Read 71575 times)

whats we should expect with a i7-7700 CPU?

First mining-project that I followed, good devs and a great community, this project has big potential!

Search for your address on aropool.com to see if you're getting shares and arionum.info (or your wallet) to see if you're receiving payments.

How do I know whether I am successfully mining or not?

Any Nvidia miner?

@kiddo It's still on 4 minutes, just a growing number of miners and the difficulty takes longer to adjust.

Is there any change in the block spacing, because I see from block 11345 to 11355 only 24s/32s/68s/12s/50s/59s/78s/etc

Thanks for a good explanation!

Having some issues though trying to run it with more than 4 hashers.
Trying to run with 7 hashers gives me the following issue:

You have 8 processors vs. 7 hashers.
Update transitioned to new block. Best DL on last block: 9223372036854775807 Difficulty updated to 140710818. New Block Height: 11339.
Node: http://aropool.com MinDL: 100000  BestDL: 9223372036854775807  Block Height: 11339
      Time on Block: 0s  Inverse Difficulty: 140710818
  Updates:   Last 1518029296s: 0  Failed: 0  Avg Update RTT: 0ms
  Shares:  Attempted: 0  Rejected: 0  Eff: 100.00%  Avg Hash/nonce: 0  Avg Submit RTT: 0ms
  Overall:  Hashes: 0  Mining Time: 0s  Avg Speed: 0.000H/s  Reported Speed: NaNH/s
 Streams  Runs H/run Cur H/s Cur TiC%  Cur WL%  Argon %    Sha %  Shares Finds Reject
Thread HashMasher-5 could not immediately reserve a core, it may experience decayed performance.
       5     1    10   12.23    88.95    1.230   99.959    0.032       0     0      0
Thread HashMasher-6 could not immediately reserve a core, it may experience decayed performance.
Thread HashMasher-7 could not immediately reserve a core, it may experience decayed performance.
       7     4     2   11.52    92.45    0.313   99.979    0.015       0     0      0
       7    15     2    5.87    93.11    0.012   99.994    0.002       0     0      0


Also puts my hashrate at around 5.9 with the i7 7700k which should apparently produce 8-11 H/s.

Any idea how to fix this?

The short answer -- the one that fits what your hardware can use.

Most AMD hardware has at least AVX support; some, AVX2.

Most recent Intel Hardware has AVX2 support; some has AVX512f -- use it if yours does.

Check with your CPU manufacturer (Intel Ark for instance shows all hardware features for each Intel CPU) to see which extensions you can use.

All hardware should be able to run the generic. Some older hardware with AVX support might run faster using "generic" -- the plain arionum-miner-java.exe which is for any Windows system.

Please note that there is a hard requirement for 64bit JRE for all versions.


As to what is better -- AVX is a kind of vector operation extension. AVX2 doubles the size of the vectors useable. AVX512f as used in this lib, doubles the size of the vector again. Each _can_ represent about 20% speedboost; although sometimes due to other hardware optimizations AVX isn't faster then Generic build.

Which one of those is the best to download and what are the differences?

Check here: https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-java/releases/tag/0.2.2

Not used a java miner before, where can i locate instructions to use it?

thanks!

After the fork, as previously said, the mining algorithm has been changed and the new hash rates are lower on the new algo (for everyone).
Do not be afraid of smaller H/s, it brings the same results as it did before the fork with higher H/s.

If you haven't updated your miner, keep  in mind your work will be rejected by the pool and you will not be able to earn ARO.

My recommendation as a miner is to use Dan's java miner!

I can confirm

Hi i did a telegram group:

https://t.me/arionum_aro

Please add it in first page and join if you want

Did anyone get a payout from pool after the fork? I am mining on the new miner for more than 12 hours and got zero.

But how is that possible that u guys are going so slow (or i am looking wrong..)

I get on 1x i7 2600: 43 H/s (with 2x the auto-miner opened)
With 1x auto-miner i get 33-34H/s

I am using the standard miner inside the ARO folder (php miner).

Info:
i am using the first release from this coin (maybe that's wrong, am i really mining? I get some shares just like before..)
Windows 10 Pro

When i look to the ''newest'' Windows Bundle, only 2 files are edited; miner.php on 5 februari, LightArionumCLI on 6 februari, all other files has not been changed, correct?

Oké, so dev tell me..
I updated the 2 files (well, i changed all files to the newest version) and now i get 1.1H/s
So i was going from 34H/s (i tought standard 4 threads) to 1.1H/s (this is 1 thread for what i can see, so i can open the miner 4 times and i get like 5H/s) ? I guess this is not a good thing?
I did read your post above that the lower speed is ''normall'', you also say that's for everybody. But, a little hour ago i was getting 30x more speed. So if i just replace the files to the old files i am going faster while using the same power consumption?
Is there a reason why i should not use the old miner what is 30x faster?

If the old, and faster miner got problems so the newer version is important to use, add that to the openingspost. The openingspost just don't have enough info (well, it almost got no information). I have to read every page in the hope i can see a reaction what can help me (not good for people what dont have 24/7 the time to read all the posts in every topic on every page).

Earlier i was getting 54H/S and now with new miner AVX2 i am getting 4.5 H/S, on windows 10 OS. Is this what is expected?

Im on windows. Perhaps thats the problem

My miner never stopped and still working with same speed. am i mining old chain?
anything i need to change?