rise AND fall, exactly. This coins prices never raised since very early on.
( This is fallacious, where is the logic in this statement? let me make it clear, let's say hypothetically it started at 5000 sats, then fell all the way to 200 sats, then went to 211 sats, then to 160 sats then to 148 sats then back to 160 sats. do you see where this is going?... that is fluctuation, volatile fluctuation to be precise. it does not matter if one day its 1 sat up or the next day its 1 sat down, that is fluctuation, Fact. I find it worrying that I had to spell that out for someone invested.)
I repeat again. The coin has:
=(prove it)
=(prove it)
- Market got flooded by cheap coins for whatever mistake the coin devs made.
=(Prove it)
- Team does not care, website still leads people to buy the WRONG coin as I believe the 2nd swap is now over.
(The swap is still currently underway, and yes you are correct the website needs sorting, however, the swap takes priority for now, as for the "team do not care" = Prove it)
- Technically is sucks as well, no build guide for linux gui wallet. Linux wallet is build for 32bit and needs all kinds of 32bit libs installed I needed to figure out the hard trail and error way, saw nothing mentioned about it.
(There are plenty of folk you could have approached to help with the linux side, there has been plenty of help on discord)
- Their supposed innovative parts is not even open source.
(That's because its innovative, and Developers have a right to protect their innovation in a space filled with rip off copy coins)
- RIO is very very low compared to other coins that have FAR more exposure, stability, marketcap, trade volume ... so there is not much incentive for anyone to get this coin to run a masternode. I guess there may be a incentive to into it and run a node when the value of the node itself barely justifies even running a server for it.
(RIO is a song by Duran Duran, and a 2011 children's movie, if you are referring to Return on Investment that is abbreviated as ROI and there are many coins with less ROI than XAX both new and established projects, like you say the other "comparable" coins have far more exposure.)
You can claim "without solid proof" all you want its just only that I lost around $1000 in this coins its so much more I mentioned above and the proof is right there. It was a good learning experience I guess but that's it. There is not the slightest thing here why anyone would trust these guys and their supposed great innovation that are not even willing to share.
I can say you make claims "without solid proof", just as you MAKE claims without solid proof, you lost money in crypto, join the ever filling wagon, everyone here has lost something at some point.
here is a tip; sell up and move on, you make all these claims about how nobody should invest, then in the same breath say you are running several XAX masternodes.
you are toxic, and it is eating away at you.
I realise that replying to your fallacies is adding fuel to your ridiculous self-pity campaign, so this is the last I will comment to you, maybe you should reflect and think about doing the same, after all, what kind of person invested in a project seeks to discredit the projects name, they are only keeping away further outside investment, and will likely never see a return. That kind of behavior is self-destructive, you are just cutting off the nose to spite the face.
So best to sell up, if you are even invested at all.