Author

Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 626. (Read 704812 times)

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
To make a long story short, flip flopping as usual, so cut the crap and spare us the B.S, half-brained dimwit
hero member
Activity: 1928
Merit: 538
china overall has very low volume ...so the china effect is becoming weaker everyday.

Im more surprised at the, silence,lol....i check many forums, threads , daily...and tbh ive not saw things this quiet for a very long time...

For me, i think many have shorted, waiting for cheap coin and will soon regret it and end up with less coin  Cheesy

<---buying  Cool

Yea its quite low but still well within the millions exept ViaBTC but I would have thought all would be well under a million by now especially when the sites close at the end of the month

I mean ViaBTC site closes in ~4days and still trading well over half a million  that seems quite a lot for being that close to the deadline


Are users able to get their funds back  ?
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 100
Wahoo for the Bitcoin revolution!
Hi, today I see that btc is above $4k and wondering if the trend continues upward if the powers that be will still hard fork in November. Any thoughts appreciated (go bch). Also, will bcc bought on yobit, transfer to bch on another exchange?

thanks
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 154
china overall has very low volume ...so the china effect is becoming weaker everyday.

Im more surprised at the, silence,lol....i check many forums, threads , daily...and tbh ive not saw things this quiet for a very long time...

For me, i think many have shorted, waiting for cheap coin and will soon regret it and end up with less coin  Cheesy

<---buying  Cool

Yea its quite low but still well within the millions exept ViaBTC but I would have thought all would be well under a million by now especially when the sites close at the end of the month

I mean ViaBTC site closes in ~4days and still trading well over half a million  that seems quite a lot for being that close to the deadline
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
china overall has very low volume ...so the china effect is becoming weaker everyday.

Im more surprised at the, silence,lol....i check many forums, threads , daily...and tbh ive not saw things this quiet for a very long time...

For me, i think many have shorted, waiting for cheap coin and will soon regret it and end up with less coin  Cheesy

<---buying  Cool
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 154
I gots a feeling that many are waiting for more huge dumps from china... Tongue
well imo....we going to see huge rises over the course of the week, as the big china dumps have happened. Smiley



I'm supprised just how much the Chinese exchanges are still trading I would have thought that the best part would have dried up by now
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
I gots a feeling that many are waiting for more huge dumps from china... Tongue
well imo....we going to see huge rises over the course of the week, as the big china dumps have happened. Smiley

legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
^yeap Coinbase are adding bch and so is stamp next week  Shocked

I can see stamp getting huge volumes...

We going up guys, demand is growing  Wink Cool
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
Everyone in the cryptocurrency world will be aware of how Bitcoin Cash is performing these days. Over the past few weeks, more and more companies enabled support for BCH. This also reflects upon how the overall trading volume is slowly heading in the right direction right now. Especially on OKEx, things are significantly improving right now, which is pretty impressive. It is good to see some new trading platforms make a big impact in this market. Once again to the moon Cheesy
More exchanges = More volume = More traders.
This is what we need for BCH now. If we can get listed in some new exchanges, eventually the prize has to go up.
Coinbase has a placeholder for a BCH stamp  Shocked
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
https://www.coindesk.com/wait-watch-bitcoin-prices-hover-near-make-break-level/

Quote
Failure at the trend line hurdle followed by a drop below $3,509 would signal a continuation of lower highs and lower lows pattern. This, coupled with the bearish daily relative strength index (RSI) would indicate a potential for a sell-off to $2,980 (September 15 low).

Buckle up! We are going dooown! Shocked
fud game = 100

market cap is experiencing a nice pump, good trade volumes to be had
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Everyone in the cryptocurrency world will be aware of how Bitcoin Cash is performing these days. Over the past few weeks, more and more companies enabled support for BCH. This also reflects upon how the overall trading volume is slowly heading in the right direction right now. Especially on OKEx, things are significantly improving right now, which is pretty impressive. It is good to see some new trading platforms make a big impact in this market. Once again to the moon Cheesy
More exchanges = More volume = More traders.
This is what we need for BCH now. If we can get listed in some new exchanges, eventually the prize has to go up.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 250
I do not understand why BCH reacts so much to the price of BTC. There must be communities of traders - which will support the price at the level, otherwise BCH will never break out into the leaders.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 552
Everyone in the cryptocurrency world will be aware of how Bitcoin Cash is performing these days. Over the past few weeks, more and more companies enabled support for BCH. This also reflects upon how the overall trading volume is slowly heading in the right direction right now. Especially on OKEx, things are significantly improving right now, which is pretty impressive. It is good to see some new trading platforms make a big impact in this market. Once again to the moon Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 108
Merit: 0
hello Bitcoin Cash team Give me Your white paper please
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 107
Not Found
^

Why?
Not that thats any real true indication of whats actually occuring within the code, its interesting to think what such a check might reveal.

Both forks claim to be the legitimate continuation of the pre split bitcoin. Ok, now who modified the code base the most?

Segwit was an ugly hack - the changeset is 6,000 lines of code. Cash changed the blocksize limit, the diff algo, and backported bugfixes (not sure of the line count, but estimating <1000).
See that's what I was expecting but I was trying to phrase impartially on the off chance I was wrong  Wink

I think that argument of simply pointing to the lines of code that were changed is extremely strong. BitcoinCash is X% the same as prefork bitcoin whereas Segwit is Z% the same.

Seems like segwit built an extremely convuluted workaround to avoid the most simple, logical upgrade one could ever imagine. Less is more. They just wanted to seem important.

Thanks for the info.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 259
Not sure why did you mention "cheap fee" at the name of the thread.

The only reason fees at the cash chain are cheaper then the original chain is that the hash power is much lower then the original chain, which also makes it much more safer to transfer money on the cash chain then on the original chain.

Also don't forget that the original chain just activated segwit so the fees are about equal at both of the chains at the moment.
 
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
^

Why?
Not that thats any real true indication of whats actually occuring within the code, its interesting to think what such a check might reveal.

Both forks claim to be the legitimate continuation of the pre split bitcoin. Ok, now who modified the code base the most?

Segwit was an ugly hack - the changeset is 6,000 lines of code. Cash changed the blocksize limit, the diff algo, and backported bugfixes (not sure of the line count, but estimating <1000).

++

In best case it was 'verschlimmbessern'

https://twitter.com/el33th4xor/status/910826456086974465
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
^

Why?
Not that thats any real true indication of whats actually occuring within the code, its interesting to think what such a check might reveal.

Both forks claim to be the legitimate continuation of the pre split bitcoin. Ok, now who modified the code base the most?

Segwit was an ugly hack - the changeset is 6,000 lines of code. Cash changed the blocksize limit, the diff algo, and backported bugfixes (not sure of the line count, but estimating <1000).
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
...As for "liking banks", I can't even...

Well, I know it's all cool and hip to hate banks but I don't!

I'm over being hip and cool. I suspect what you mean to say is that you "tolerate banks and find it unlikely that they'll be replaced in our lifetime". Both of which I can agree with. Nerds who believe that cryptos represent a direct challenge to fiat empires are a bit overly idealistic.



(Banks) have an important role and function in our modern society. We will always have banks, perhaps a little different setup than today in the future but we will still have banks. Thinking that just with a blockchain, we no longer need banks, rules and regulations and government oversight is very naïve in my humble opinion.

Not only that but also most people need the stability which banks offer. Money is not just money. Money is life. All these life hours you put into work, they convert into money. Thinking some random guys somewhere setting up a server and running a few full nodes will replace banking is almost childish.


Not a personal attack, just my opinions.

Not sure where you're banking, but last I checked the banking industry has created so many unchecked financial bubbles (real estate, stocks, derivatives), and an accounting system that is roughly as valid as a child drawing with 4 colors of crayons. Not to mention that they spy on their customers, charge exorbitant fees to earn interest on your money, engage in widespread market-rigging and fraudulent fractional lending, and generally place a burden on almost all economic activity. Oh, and I did I mention that they work fist in glove with repressive money-printing governments and multinationals to part the masses from their wealth?

So I don't see the "stability which banks offer".  And I think if you truly love and value your money, you'll be best off to keep it safe from the centrally controlled banking system any way that you can. The simple fact is that Bitcoin and cryptos came about precisely when they did because the financial sector had become a giant self-serving fraud and generally a cancer on society. IMHO our recent thread about exchanges and Tether demonstrates exactly what happens when you take the legacy fraud-ridden banking business model and apply it to cryptos.

Back ontopic, BTC looks a little shaky out there. No more roaring past $4000 the minute the dip finishes... And it seems that all other crypto exchange rates still move together with BTC. At this point I'm done with charts and technical hokum. I'm buying a BCH dip and holding because I believe the technology is superior.

Oh, and mining BCH is still 1.10x more profitable than mining BTC.
Jump to: