Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 628. (Read 704412 times)

tbh, niether have i, i dont care about segwit1 , so def wont care about seg2 lol
its just from what i hear now and again, that no replay protection is bad and i got no idea who or why they are doing this...maybe they want to mess up btc txs.

tbh, niether have i, i dont care about segwit1 , so def wont care about seg2 lol
its just from what i hear now and again, that no replay protection is bad and i got no idea who or why they are doing this...maybe they want to mess up btc txs.

Not really I still see this as being dead on day 1

Ive not looked once into how the mining will work i'm guessing there will be no contingency plan for if there is no miner support from day 1 so unless its able to be dual mined with the core chain then I can't see it even getting started without a huge starting value

Like I said i've not looked and don't care enough to look at how mining is going to work so what I just said could be a non issue

^

Do we know the exact date of this fork? I will use Electrum, should work fine, yes?

^this next fork is dangerous for btc...if things dont go well....
bch will be the first/popular coin for hedging

btw we still going up guys  

I would get a Trezor and move all of your BTC to those private keys and wait for Slush to come up with an easy solution. (Just a personal preference though.)

So safest best is to wait maybe a few days-week after the hardfork for things to settle, and then move your coin to either an exchange or another bitcoin wallet???
Much appreciated again.

Just to add to this if you do try to split ONLY move to another wallet you have the keys for DO NOT try to make your first transaction on ANY chain to an exchange or similar

that something off is not you dumb ass moron, that is not you fucking "off"

True, but I'm done with you guys, have fun, and happy trading

What am I reading on this thread? Geeez, Tek really likes banks, LMFAO, he's not one quote : '"of those banks haters" hahahaha unquote

Yes I know but we already have regular banks for such fast transactions who are much more stable, much trustworthy and stuff don't disappear or lose value over night.

Bitcoin was supposed to be like cash but in electronic form. Cash is not centralized.

It is not even mostly about anonymity but convenient of removing borders and making the world smaller, bringing all people closer to each other instead of middle men taking a cut out of everything.

You are missing the entire point of "original" Bitcoin and that is why the current Bitcoin is not "true" Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is the true Bitcoin. Slow as it may but it is keeping the original "cash" idea of the Bitcoin.

You start putting middle men in this thing, it is no longer Bitcoin and we already have regular banks as middle men.

Edit: Of course, it does not mean "BCH" will "win" in the end. Not always, the better man wins.

Edit 2: and I don't care what others say, I'm not one of those "bank haters" at all. I really like banks. I have everything digital in bank and all bills automated. No papers, no nothing. I don't even have to login to my bank! Many good banks out there who provide excellent service. People hate banks for debts and such but no one forced them to take the debt! Banks are safe and in Europe, we even have guarantee of our deposits if a bank fails. No such thing could be said about Bitcoins or any other of these digital "currencies"... so no, I don't hate banks, I like banks. They have oversight from governments and they are safe! That is why they are called "Banks" and not "Exchange". My two cents.

https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/911222055915229184


Yes, well, dear Roger Ver, I waited more than 12 hours for confirmations. Lost money on it.

Utility you say?

I like BCH but that stuff needs to get fixed fast!

Edit: Odd, no tweets from Jihan in a long time now, https://twitter.com/JihanWu.