Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 126. (Read 225834 times)
Things are getting implemented. A new valued P2P internet is getting born
https://www.yours.org/content/proof-of-concept-edi-850-transaction-from-dynamics-365-erp-ebed3756d0eb
https://www.yours.org/content/proof-of-concept-edi-850-transaction-from-dynamics-365-erp-ebed3756d0eb
Im with you from the begining. I hope we will see a new ath soon.
The proof is in the pudding not all willing to get or even eat.
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969&SearchText=
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969&SearchText=
"Proof" of what? An Australian man leaves a comment on an American legal issue. Anybody in the world can comment here, and anybody does. The only thing this is "proof" of is that Craig believes he's Satoshi.
"If anyone tells you separately the blockchain can work outside existing legislation, statutes and
rules they are seeking to mislead and defraud for the sole purpose of avoiding regulation and
creating unregulated bucket shops and dark web markets."
It does work outside existing legislation and it has for the entirety of its existence. What's he rambling about? He's clearly a lunatic.
Triggered?
Get over it
The proof is in the pudding not all willing to get or even eat.
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969&SearchText=
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969&SearchText=
I bet you could 
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
Great question.
For myself, what constitutes Bitcoin is the Whitepaper NOT the BTC ticker.
This is because the 2 sentences in the Bitcoin Whitepaper introduction correlate ONLY to the economic model associated with BSV. Off chain lightning trsactions have no relevance to hash power and therefore POW. Miners become irrelevant with lightning as they are not incentivized to work.
BTC and BSV are two completely different expierents, but BTC has zero correlation to the economic model of Bitcoin. For this reason, some believe BSV is Bitcoin.
Hope that helps!
You didn't prove anything through reliable sources. You stated your shill case to promote a coin developed by a fraud, which I have to say contains an impressive amount of misinformation. Pretty much everything you just said is incorrect. I could dissect your claims point by point, but they are irrelevant because you're not a reliable source.
I really do believe the bitcoin white paper is a reliable source.
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
Great question.
For myself, what constitutes Bitcoin is the Whitepaper NOT the BTC ticker.
This is because the last 2 sentences in the Bitcoin Whitepaper introduction correlate ONLY to the economic model associated with BSV. Off chain lightning trsactions have no relevance to hash power and therefore POW. Miners become irrelevant with lightning as they are not incentivized to work.
BTC and BSV are two completely different experiments, but BTC has zero correlation to the economic model of Bitcoin. For this reason, some believe BSV is Bitcoin.
Hope that helps!
https://twitter.com/bigredmurphy/status/1096109140865437696?s=21
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
Code diffs might help u. But if u hold bitcoin from 2009 on u can still use those on bsv wallets like CashPay or handcash on BSV.
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
To learn and structure information to be useful needs PoW all the time
https://youtu.be/S6rd1KbF7sc
Hodl just dont
Malleability is a feature.
https://youtu.be/S6rd1KbF7sc
Hodl just dont
Malleability is a feature.
nutildah handing out merit poop points left right and center for shitposts.
It was a good post. It was more informative and useful than your combined entirety of postings.
You, on the other hand, should probably be given a red trust for furthering the b.s. of a proven con artist.
You know CSW is a liar, yet you're going to continue to shill for his coin... why? Because you are also dishonest.
This is the Bitcoin SV thread.
nutildah handing out merit poop points left right and center for shitposts.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.
Disprove the man's proofs why not.
Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming
what is that?
Why d u care anyway? Things are all about proof of work.
Read
Think
Work it out.
Nobody will do that work for u.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.
Disprove the man's proofs why not.
Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming
what is that?
Why d u care anyway? Things are all about proof of work.
Read
Think
Work it out.
Nobody will do that work for u.
One start of many https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3065857
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.
Disprove the man's proofs why not.
Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming
what is that?
Okay, what is your opinion Gavin being convinced beyond reasonable doubt? You’re saying Craig fooled Gavin or are you saying that Craig and Gavin are both liars?
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.
https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1094942637553901568?s=21
Hmm seems CSW was caught plagiarizing an academic paper:
https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800
He changed the names of a few variables and the context is applied to mining rather than gambling, but it would appear he more or less lifted equations from pre-existing articles without properly accrediting them.
https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800
He changed the names of a few variables and the context is applied to mining rather than gambling, but it would appear he more or less lifted equations from pre-existing articles without properly accrediting them.
Peter Rizun also said mining 64mb blocks was impossible.
you can’t quote jimmy ‘always wrong brokeback meathead’ song as a reliable source over Gavin Anderson, that destroys your ability to interpret valid from invalid facts.
Jump to: