[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 126.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: sirsplashalot on February 15, 2019, 12:02:34 PM

Quote from: jooj2 on February 15, 2019, 10:19:53 AM

May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?

I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.

Great question.

For myself, what constitutes Bitcoin is the Whitepaper NOT the BTC ticker.

This is because the 2 sentences in the Bitcoin Whitepaper introduction correlate ONLY to the economic model associated with BSV. Off chain lightning trsactions have no relevance to hash power and therefore POW. Miners become irrelevant with lightning as they are not incentivized to work.

BTC and BSV are two completely different expierents, but BTC has zero correlation to the economic model of Bitcoin. For this reason, some believe BSV is Bitcoin.

Hope that helps!

You didn't prove anything through reliable sources. You stated your shill case to promote a coin developed by a fraud, which I have to say contains an impressive amount of misinformation. Pretty much everything you just said is incorrect. I could dissect your claims point by point, but they are irrelevant because you're not a reliable source.

I really do believe the bitcoin white paper is a reliable source.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: jooj2 on February 15, 2019, 10:19:53 AM

May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?

I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.

Great question.

For myself, what constitutes Bitcoin is the Whitepaper NOT the BTC ticker.

This is because the last 2 sentences in the Bitcoin Whitepaper introduction correlate ONLY to the economic model associated with BSV. Off chain lightning trsactions have no relevance to hash power and therefore POW. Miners become irrelevant with lightning as they are not incentivized to work.

BTC and BSV are two completely different experiments, but BTC has zero correlation to the economic model of Bitcoin. For this reason, some believe BSV is Bitcoin.

Hope that helps!

https://twitter.com/bigredmurphy/status/1096109140865437696?s=21

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: jooj2 on February 15, 2019, 10:19:53 AM

May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?

I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.

Code diffs might help u. But if u hold bitcoin from 2009 on u can still use those on bsv wallets like CashPay or handcash on BSV.

jooj2

member

Activity: 126

Merit: 10

May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?

I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

To learn and structure information to be useful needs PoW all the time

https://youtu.be/S6rd1KbF7sc

Hodl just dont

Malleability is a feature.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: sirsplashalot on February 14, 2019, 06:36:30 PM

nutildah handing out merit poop points left right and center for shitposts.

It was a good post. It was more informative and useful than your combined entirety of postings.

You, on the other hand, should probably be given a red trust for furthering the b.s. of a proven con artist.

You know CSW is a liar, yet you're going to continue to shill for his coin... why? Because you are also dishonest.

This is the Bitcoin SV thread.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a

Bitcoin is $60

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

nutildah handing out merit poop points left right and center for shitposts.

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hv_ on February 12, 2019, 09:50:37 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.

So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.

Why make snarky comments about me? I didn't comment on what I quoted.
Disprove the man's proofs why not.

Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming

what is that?

Why d u care anyway? Things are all about proof of work.

Read

Think

Work it out.

Nobody will do that work for u.

Quote from: hv_ on February 12, 2019, 01:32:43 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hv_ on February 12, 2019, 09:50:37 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.

So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.

Why make snarky comments about me? I didn't comment on what I quoted.
Disprove the man's proofs why not.

Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming

what is that?

Why d u care anyway? Things are all about proof of work.

Read

Think

Work it out.

Nobody will do that work for u.

One start of many https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3065857

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hv_ on February 12, 2019, 09:50:37 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.

So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.

Why make snarky comments about me? I didn't comment on what I quoted.
Disprove the man's proofs why not.

Also malwarebytes doesn't like this thing you're spamming

what is that?

Okay, what is your opinion Gavin being convinced beyond reasonable doubt? You’re saying Craig fooled Gavin or are you saying that Craig and Gavin are both liars?

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: ?? on ??

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.

So many 'proofs'.. you must have taken deep logic lessons hero.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: ?? on ??

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/apc9c1/craig_wright_caught_lying_again/
https://archive.is/D6P7n
tldr;
On 10 february Craig Wright tried to convince people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by releasing an abstract of a research paper called "Black Net" that he supposedly wrote for the Australian government in 2001. The abstract is almost identical to the official Bitcoin whitepaper of October 2008. However, Satoshi had a draft in August 2008 of the Bitcoin whitepaper and when we compare the draft with the official Bitcoin whitepaper, we can see that the corrections made between August and October 2008 are also found in the Craig's paper from "2001". This proves again that he is a liar.

https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1094942637553901568?s=21

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hmm seems CSW was caught plagiarizing an academic paper:

https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800

He changed the names of a few variables and the context is applied to mining rather than gambling, but it would appear he more or less lifted equations from pre-existing articles without properly accrediting them.

Peter Rizun also said mining 64mb blocks was impossible.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

you can’t quote jimmy ‘always wrong brokeback meathead’ song as a reliable source over Gavin Anderson, that destroys your ability to interpret valid from invalid facts.

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

honolulumark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Knowledge is power

check check Tongue

Woolles890

member

Activity: 448

Merit: 10

A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards

There are still a lot of sentiments with BSV, this is the game that has happened, BSV has a fluctuating value of ups and downs. Being able to shift the position of old coins at CMC, capitalization is also quite good and getting into the top 10 coins, good performance, can it last for the long term?

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

https://youtu.be/ATapuAYgEeI

Craig Wright ltimeline livestream

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: ?? on ??

Craig Wright is a great liar. Large blocks are not a future

Lol.. like to limit eMail or any other internet protocol content? Who are you...

drmutz

jr. member

Activity: 39

Merit: 5

Hello Folks,

I have just updated the crypto-docker project at https://github.com/bostontrader/crypto-docker. Among other things, fans of of BSV might be interested in the following:

With crypto-docker you can build docker images that contain the BSV binaries built from a recent commit of https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv using Alpine Linux.

You can choose to build an image without debug symbols, but with optimization, resulting in a rather small image of about 50 MB.

Or you can choose to build an image with debug symbols and no optimization, resulting in a larger image. But this image includes gdb and gdbgui which enables you to debug the executables using gdb and a browser on your host system.

Enjoy!

Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 126. (Read 226361 times)