Bitcoin SV is looking very strong at the moment, especially when most of the alts are down.
Looking at the daily chart, it seems that the 0.02 area is major resistance since it was support back in January before it broke under.
If the 0.02 ratio is broken, then I expect a quick rise to the 0.03 ATH area and over there will most likely be profit taking.
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 125. (Read 225834 times)
Due to protocol stability and proper expectation management real use cases are incoming to Bitcoin
https://coingeek.com/unisot-uses-bitcoin-sv-help-companies-reduce-supply-chain-costs/
https://coingeek.com/unisot-uses-bitcoin-sv-help-companies-reduce-supply-chain-costs/
Again, what you're talking about applies to a thousand different coins. BSV is just yet another bitcoin fork (or fork of a fork to be technically correct) and the market is treating it as such. Bitcoin mining isn't in any danger of shutting down or ceasing to be. A huge uptick in LN usage won't be the end of mining.
I definitely agreed with you.Bitcoin SV, in fact, is another fork coin, or more exactly I would like to call it as pyramid fork coin.
Do you think about the pyramid fork coin term?
I thought the new term is relevant to describe such a fork of fork coin.
BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.
Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money.
Ur mixing up price and value. Grow up.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
U re too much in speculation mode. Value comes from usability and stability of its underlying, mainly the base protocol. Legal acceptance is major filter for world wide adoption- one of the killers for all other crap we still see in that speculation bubble.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.
So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point.
Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy.
Again, what you're talking about applies to a thousand different coins. BSV is just yet another bitcoin fork and the market is treating it as such. Bitcoin mining isn't in any danger of shutting down or ceasing to be. A huge uptick in LN usage won't be the end of mining.
That’s sustainable thinking.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.
So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point.
Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy.
BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.
Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money.
Ur mixing up price and value. Grow up.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.
BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.
Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money.
Ur mixing up price and value. Grow up.
There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf
Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:
April 7 2017- Doctor of Philosophy
Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/
His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child.
More on that
https://dannidfitnessandnutrition.com/2018/08/13/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother/
BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.
It also seems that it has the biggest story of value as well.
There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf
Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:
April 7 2017- Doctor of Philosophy
Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/
His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child.
More on that
https://dannidfitnessandnutrition.com/2018/08/13/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother/
There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf
Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:
April 7 2017- Doctor of Philosophy
Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/
Right.... So you would rather DISMISS the achievements I just listed dating back to at least 2005. This is PoW if you don't get that your just another sheep. This doesn't even include his PUBLISHED and also PEER-REVIEWED papers. The truth is in front of you if you put in the PoW and actually do your OWN thinking. If you have been in this community for as long as you have then you should understand how bitcoin works. I have and I have only been doing this for the last 2 years.
Keep up with the dismissing though. You reap what you sow and I want you to remember this 5-10 years down the road.
Cheers I have work to do.
There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf
Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:
April 7 2017- Doctor of Philosophy
Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/
His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child.
Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?
Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them.
Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from.
Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't.
Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant.
There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.
https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf
Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:
April 7 2017- Doctor of Philosophy
Dec 11 2009- Master of Statistics
May 15 2008- Master of Laws with Commendation
June 28 2012- Master of Science Information Security Engineering
Sept 21 2012- Master of Science Information Security Management
April 2 2009- Master of Information Systems Security
May 3 2006- Master of Management (Information Technology)
April 8 2005- Master of Networking and System Administration
GIAC Information Technology Certificates:
July 3 2007- GIAC Security Essentials- GSEC
Sept 16 2006- GIAC Systems and Network Auditor- GSNA
Feb 5 2011- GIAC Information Security Professional- GISP
April 24 2008- GIAC Security Leadership- GSLC
Feb 12 2011- GIAC Secure Software Programmer- .NET-GSSP-.NET
July 24 2011- GIAC Penetration Tester- GPEN
Sept 16 2006- GIAC Systems and Network Auditor- GSNA
Jan 1 2011- GIAC Web Application Penetration Tester- GWAPT
Jan 22 2011- GIAC Information Security Fundamentals- GISF
Dec 21 2007- GIAC Assessing and Auditing Wireless Networks- GAWN
June 24 2008- GIAC Hydration Detection
Jan 15 2008- GIAC Electronic Contracting in a Secure World
Sept 15 2009- GIAC Security Expert- GSEC
April 25 2005- GIAC Certified ISO-17799 Specialist- G7799
Sept 6 2005- GIAC Certified Forensics Analyst- GCFA
May 25 2009- GIAC Certified Project Manager- GCPM
Dec 8 2008- GIAC Current Issues in DNS
June 28 2007- GIAC Legal Issues in Information Technology & Security- GLEG
June 2 2008- GIAC .NET- GNET
ISACA Information Technology Certificates:
June 17 2003- Certified Information Security Manager
ISC Information Technology Certificates:
June 2006- Certified Information Systems Security Professional
But but but ... LN is Bitcoin they said
https://mobile.twitter.com/pierre_rochard/status/1098222798546354177?s=21
https://www.yours.org/content/the-john-dillon-leaks---redacted-d839bae64ca6
https://mobile.twitter.com/pierre_rochard/status/1098222798546354177?s=21
https://www.yours.org/content/the-john-dillon-leaks---redacted-d839bae64ca6
Bitcoin Cash Forked Splitting Into Two Blockchains
https://forklog.media/bitcoin-cash-forked-splitting-into-two-blockchains
https://forklog.media/bitcoin-cash-forked-splitting-into-two-blockchains
Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?
Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them.
Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from.
Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't.
Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant.
There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554
"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."
Looks like he has at least 5 masters, he forsure has 1 completed PhD and he’s currently at Leicester doing a PhD in law. But that’s okay, take this video for example, you provide proof and your still a scammer according to 180 dislikes.
https://youtu.be/QiK34QicusI
Would you be more satisfied with 11 masters instead of 10?
Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?
Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them.
Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from.
Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't.
Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant.
Already read that in great detail.
Foul play alleged from all sides.
CSW claims to be Satoshi and yet has still not Signed any block as definitive proof.
I'm certainly not a troll, I used to communicate with Satoshi (on this very forum).
Unlike Craig, I have verified myself ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/verifying-my-old-zero-balance-wallet-address-for-blockchain-research-etc-4630066
Craig (currently) being unable or unwilling to (legitimately) Sign anything has caused 2 major problems for BSV / nchain.
1) Not signing a stated claim is a false pretence.
2) The continuing duration of this false pretence has impacted on the entire crypto space, including the market.
...
If folks actually digested my own posts you would likely discover that I have not referred to Craig as a 'Faketoshi' or otherwise.
Innocent until proven guilty. However ...
Why does Craig avoid Bitcoin 'old timers' like the plague and/or not just come back to this forum to set the record straight? According to Craig's own story he had moved on to other things ... whilst leaving the Bitcoin community to both establish, maintain and build the project in his absence (and off their own backs!).
Do you think it is OK to retain the (metaphorical) last piece of the puzzle, to place the final piece and to proclaim wholeheartedly "I built all this" and "You are all wrong!" etc.,
...
People in the world
Do not doubt
It is teaching
Which is the
beginning of doubt.
- Zen poem
...
Again, this is Financial Cryptography, so do not trust. Sign and Verify.
Simply, Put up, or Shut up.
- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+up+or+shut+up
Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?
Thx. This is massive content and analysis.
I m sure way too much to read for most trolls.
Jump to: