Topic: [ANN] [BTQ] BitQuark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining - page 14. (Read 162267 times)
Yes, that makes perfect sense. I'll try it as long as it doesn't get me banned.
I will see what I can do with added a feature like the one you've mentioned.
I will have to compare my GPU shares to CPU shares to see what I get. I know that it depends on the stratum difficulty. Like for example the CPU port 6011 has a fixed difficulty of 1, which the GPU port 6010 has a variable difficulty ranging from 1 to 64. So typically if your difficulty is set at 8, the 1 submitted share is actually at least 8 shares. Does that make sense to you? The best way to test this is to use you GPU on the CPU port 6011 and them compare them.
I will have to compare my GPU shares to CPU shares to see what I get. I know that it depends on the stratum difficulty. Like for example the CPU port 6011 has a fixed difficulty of 1, which the GPU port 6010 has a variable difficulty ranging from 1 to 64. So typically if your difficulty is set at 8, the 1 submitted share is actually at least 8 shares. Does that make sense to you? The best way to test this is to use you GPU on the CPU port 6011 and them compare them.
Something else I notice is interesting. I just put an nVidia GT640 GDDR5 video card in my computer. I've been GPU mining at ~1400KH/s and CPU mining with 3 of 4 cores at 350KH/s. Over the course of a fixed period at 350KH/s produced 1400 shares, 4 shares per KH/s. Over that same period 1400KH/s produced 2800 shares, only 2 shares per KH/s.
Does this mean as it appears that CPU mining is twice as efficient as GPU? Or are the shares produced by the GPU also twice as large or more to make up the difference?
Does this mean as it appears that CPU mining is twice as efficient as GPU? Or are the shares produced by the GPU also twice as large or more to make up the difference?
Was going to start listing some items at auction.bitquark.info but the security certificate is expired. You and I know it's still secured but newcomers will not.
On the new wallet, is it too late to get a feature request in? I've been defragging my wallets lately and it would be SOOOOOO nice if we could multi-select amounts to send like most file managers, ie highlight one, scroll down, hold shift and click to highlight a range, click once on a box to check all in the selected range.
Just a thought.
On the new wallet, is it too late to get a feature request in? I've been defragging my wallets lately and it would be SOOOOOO nice if we could multi-select amounts to send like most file managers, ie highlight one, scroll down, hold shift and click to highlight a range, click once on a box to check all in the selected range.
Just a thought.
should update the op.. many link does not work anymore..
and is anything new is coming about this community? interrest and value is going down..
news about the android wallet?
I just export my android wallet.. and found 22k BTQ in it.. before the block 120 000 I had 1427 btq
EDIT: BTW the Lottery game is still alive!... nothing's happen... http://lotto.ddns.net/bitquarklotto
and is anything new is coming about this community? interrest and value is going down..
news about the android wallet?
I just export my android wallet.. and found 22k BTQ in it.. before the block 120 000 I had 1427 btq
EDIT: BTW the Lottery game is still alive!... nothing's happen... http://lotto.ddns.net/bitquarklotto
Not sure why but my wallet network hash rate indicator is grossly under reporting the actual network hash rate.
This will be corrected in the next update. I have already updated & testing the code for the BTQ client used at the pool. So far it looks like it's working correctly.
Not sure why but my wallet network hash rate indicator is grossly under reporting the actual network hash rate.
The BTQ pool maybe down for a short time tonight due to server maintenance.
This maintenance will result in approximately ten minutes of downtime per rack at some point within the maintenance window as individual switches are upgraded.
Maintenance window:
2015-08-27 22:00 EDT - 2015-08-28 02:00 EDT
2015-08-28 02:00 UTC - 2015-08-28 06:00 UTC
This maintenance will result in approximately ten minutes of downtime per rack at some point within the maintenance window as individual switches are upgraded.
Maintenance window:
2015-08-27 22:00 EDT - 2015-08-28 02:00 EDT
2015-08-28 02:00 UTC - 2015-08-28 06:00 UTC
I should have the mobile BTQ wallet back up and going very soon. Talking with a dev about updating the app.
Oh and i want to confirm that using pywallet to remove your unconfirmed transactions works with Bitquark. It deletes all transactions from your wallet then when you -rescan it makes it so that your wallet only reflects what actually got through to the blockchain and confirmed.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/guide-delete-your-0unconfirmed-transactions-in-30-seconds-35214
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/guide-delete-your-0unconfirmed-transactions-in-30-seconds-35214
Quoting this steve321 and anyone else with unconfirmed transactions.
I do not understand. Site and pools in network. The config addnode added
Quote
addnode=bitquark.info
addnode=weminebtq.com
addnode=bitq.suprnova.cc
But the purse is not synchronized. What is the reason?addnode=weminebtq.com
addnode=bitq.suprnova.cc
addr" : "37.59.21.58:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 430577,
"bytesrecv" : 4188416,
"conntime" : 1437029800,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337517,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "71.68.241.214:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 85226,
"bytesrecv" : 283980,
"conntime" : 1437029801,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337517,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "104.236.46.153:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031389,
"bytessent" : 59704,
"bytesrecv" : 74257,
"conntime" : 1437029802,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337517,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "45.55.128.251:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 58983,
"bytesrecv" : 70311,
"conntime" : 1437029904,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337519,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "85.25.214.175:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031418,
"lastrecv" : 1437031418,
"bytessent" : 35802,
"bytesrecv" : 49938,
"conntime" : 1437029943,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337520,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.165.82.235:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031415,
"lastrecv" : 1437031415,
"bytessent" : 1911764,
"bytesrecv" : 177866,
"conntime" : 1437030044,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337413,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "66.172.10.28:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031388,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 18098,
"bytesrecv" : 59680,
"conntime" : 1437030152,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337525,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "174.63.8.191:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 24163,
"bytesrecv" : 67632,
"conntime" : 1437030164,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337525,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
Good luck
Thanks for this. I wonder why peer info such a moving target? Dynamic IP's?
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations? Thanks
Here is a screenshot of the transaction:
http://imgur.com/mkEOKGf
Can you post the Transaction ID? Also have you contacted C-Cex to see if they have a problem with their wallet?
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations? Thanks
Here is a screenshot of the transaction:
http://imgur.com/mkEOKGf
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations? Thanks
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer. Anything I can check before sending another one?
Thanks
Thanks
Is comkort not an exchange anymore?
I'm not sure, haven't used them in along time. I do all my trading at C-cex.
Is comkort not an exchange anymore?
Is there a reason you did not include a autobuild.sh with the new source code?
I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
I forgot to add it to the source code folder, but I will add it to the github sometime today.
Is there a reason you did not include a autobuild.sh with the new source code?
I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
OMFG, HAVE YOU GUYS SEEN THIS:
Someone wishes to buy 31% of current total supply... Unfortunately, for me it's last hope gone to get some cheap BTQ before it gets delisted... But I'm keeping my buy orders open till the very end, maybe whale cancels his order
Someone wishes to buy 31% of current total supply... Unfortunately, for me it's last hope gone to get some cheap BTQ before it gets delisted... But I'm keeping my buy orders open till the very end, maybe whale cancels his order
Jump to: