Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [BTQ] BitQuark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining - page 14. (Read 162321 times)

sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Yes, that makes perfect sense. I'll try it as long as it doesn't get me banned.  Cool
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
I will see what I can do with added a feature like the one you've mentioned.

I will have to compare my GPU shares to CPU shares to see what I get.  I know that it depends on the stratum difficulty. Like for example the CPU port 6011 has a fixed difficulty of 1, which the GPU port 6010 has a variable difficulty ranging from 1 to 64. So typically if your difficulty is set at 8, the 1 submitted share is actually at least 8 shares. Does that make sense to you? The best way to test this is to use you GPU on the CPU port 6011 and them compare them.
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Something else I notice is interesting. I just put an nVidia GT640 GDDR5 video card in my computer. I've been GPU mining at ~1400KH/s and CPU mining with 3 of 4 cores at 350KH/s. Over the course of a fixed period at 350KH/s produced 1400 shares, 4 shares per KH/s. Over that same period 1400KH/s produced 2800 shares, only 2 shares per KH/s.

Does this mean as it appears that CPU mining is twice as efficient as GPU? Or are the shares produced by the GPU also twice as large or more to make up the difference?
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Was going to start listing some items at auction.bitquark.info but the security certificate is expired. You and I know it's still secured but newcomers will not.

On the new wallet, is it too late to get a feature request in? I've been defragging my wallets lately and it would be SOOOOOO nice if we could multi-select amounts to send like most file managers, ie highlight one, scroll down, hold shift and click to highlight a range, click once on a box to check all in the selected range.

Just a thought.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
should update the op.. many link does not work anymore..

and is anything new is coming about this community? interrest and value is going down..


news about the android wallet?
I just export my android wallet.. and found 22k BTQ in it..  before the block 120 000 I had 1427 btq

EDIT: BTW the Lottery game is still alive!... nothing's happen... http://lotto.ddns.net/bitquarklotto
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
Not sure why but my wallet network hash rate indicator is grossly under reporting the actual network hash rate.

This will be corrected in the next update. I have already updated & testing the code for the BTQ client used at the pool. So far it looks like it's working correctly.
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Not sure why but my wallet network hash rate indicator is grossly under reporting the actual network hash rate.
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
The BTQ pool maybe down for a short time tonight due to server maintenance.

This maintenance will result in approximately ten minutes of downtime per rack at some point within the maintenance window as individual switches are upgraded.

Maintenance window:
2015-08-27 22:00 EDT - 2015-08-28 02:00 EDT
2015-08-28 02:00 UTC - 2015-08-28 06:00 UTC
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
I should have the mobile BTQ wallet back up and going very soon. Talking with a dev about updating the app.
sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
Oh and i want to confirm that using pywallet to remove your unconfirmed transactions works with Bitquark. It deletes all transactions from your wallet then when you -rescan it makes it so that your wallet only reflects what actually got through to the blockchain and confirmed.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/guide-delete-your-0unconfirmed-transactions-in-30-seconds-35214

Quoting this steve321 and anyone else with unconfirmed transactions.
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
I do not understand. Site and pools in network. The config addnode added
Quote
addnode=bitquark.info
addnode=weminebtq.com
addnode=bitq.suprnova.cc
But the purse is not synchronized. What is the reason?

addr" : "37.59.21.58:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 430577,
"bytesrecv" : 4188416,
"conntime" : 1437029800,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337517,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "71.68.241.214:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 85226,
"bytesrecv" : 283980,
"conntime" : 1437029801,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337517,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "104.236.46.153:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031389,
"bytessent" : 59704,
"bytesrecv" : 74257,
"conntime" : 1437029802,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337517,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "45.55.128.251:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 58983,
"bytesrecv" : 70311,
"conntime" : 1437029904,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337519,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "85.25.214.175:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031418,
"lastrecv" : 1437031418,
"bytessent" : 35802,
"bytesrecv" : 49938,
"conntime" : 1437029943,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337520,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.165.82.235:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031415,
"lastrecv" : 1437031415,
"bytessent" : 1911764,
"bytesrecv" : 177866,
"conntime" : 1437030044,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337413,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "66.172.10.28:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031388,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 18098,
"bytesrecv" : 59680,
"conntime" : 1437030152,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337525,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "174.63.8.191:9596",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437031414,
"lastrecv" : 1437031414,
"bytessent" : 24163,
"bytesrecv" : 67632,
"conntime" : 1437030164,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/BitQuark:0.8.3.19/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1337525,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

Good luck

Thanks for this. I wonder why peer info such a moving target? Dynamic IP's?
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer.  Anything I can check before sending another one?


Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations?

Here is a screenshot of the transaction:
http://imgur.com/mkEOKGf

Can you post the Transaction ID? Also have you contacted C-Cex to see if they have a problem with their wallet?
hero member
Activity: 627
Merit: 500
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer.  Anything I can check before sending another one?


Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations?

Here is a screenshot of the transaction:
http://imgur.com/mkEOKGf
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer.  Anything I can check before sending another one?


Thanks
Can you post a screen shot of the transactions? If not, does it show that the transactions has any confirmations?
hero member
Activity: 627
Merit: 500
Hi, I sent a small transaction to c-cex, and it looks good from the wallet side, but did not show up there, or on the block explorer.  Anything I can check before sending another one?


Thanks
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
Is comkort not an exchange anymore?

I'm not sure, haven't used them in along time. I do all my trading at C-cex.
sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
Is comkort not an exchange anymore?
hero member
Activity: 716
Merit: 501
Is there a reason you did not include a autobuild.sh with the new source code?

I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.

I forgot to add it to the source code folder, but I will add it to the github sometime today.
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Is there a reason you did not include a autobuild.sh with the new source code?

I kluged one together and it's hopefully compiling now. Just wondering.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
OMFG, HAVE YOU GUYS SEEN THIS:


Someone wishes to buy 31% of current total supply... Unfortunately, for me it's last hope gone to get some cheap BTQ before it gets delisted... But I'm keeping my buy orders open till the very end, maybe whale cancels his order Cheesy
Pages:
Jump to: