Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Cachecoin |CACH| POW+POS | NO PREMINE | NO ICO | CRYPTOPIA | - page 45. (Read 81319 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
the solutions from cach.digger.work are too fast or in other words too light. it is not so good if the hashing power is centralidzed. Large miners could operate as solo miner, it's better for the Network.
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
Ok. We will check it!


http://cerberus.ageleis.de page 3

Rollback to block 173757


173757   0345e68d277cedf670d27dd3644f25488ff42c5d5d2e0a31cf5adb1a60ce6270   1   0.62657000   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:25:12 GMT
173824   67eb01fbd936670e23895fadf8cf21a7764cb0bce6a077543d4890ee8aa6cfb4   1   94.81000000   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:09:09 GMT
173823   0ce8814d39258080ac30dcdf15931157a73ade0be4b81e8a6f8368902c783051   1   94.85000000   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:03:38 GMT

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
Ok. We will check it!
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
What I see that P2Pool is working without any troubles!


173803   Burovik   06/14/2017 15:44:19   0.0003   95.5200   2,862   11,761   410.94
173802   Plastilin   06/14/2017 15:32:35   0.0003   95.5600   2,860   1,142   39.93
173801   thedivine   06/14/2017 15:31:29   0.0003   95.6000   2,853   1,342   47.04
173800   anonymous   06/14/2017 15:30:11   0.0003   95.6400   2,845   3,710   130.40
173799   ms8787   06/14/2017 15:26:32   0.0003   95.6900   2,838   307   10.82

2-3 hours after the explorer displayed 173824, cach.digger.word behind. Then there was a rollback to 173766 in the explorer.

The problem was.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
What I see that P2Pool is working without any troubles!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
I could expect the problem by the pool, but any case I will check with the developer.
CACH.DIGGER.WORK - Next Network Block   173,771    (Current: 173,770)
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
No fork - the new blocks are coming now - 173766
Most probably I made a mistake by writing a block number from explorer - 173824

cach.digger.work shows 173803

No, you were not mistaken, I also saw that block in the explorer. Then there was a rollback.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
No fork - the new blocks are coming now - 173766
Most probably I made a mistake by writing a block number from explorer - 173824
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
We will check it. Maybe it's a fork.
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
I have passed this info to the owner of pool.
The network doesn't have any problem as soon as block explorer shows last block 173824!

http://Http://cerberus.ageleis.de/ shows 173763.
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
Alternatively you could mine in P2Pool - IKARUS

Your pool reports on block 173766. Splitting the network?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
Alternatively you could mine in P2Pool - IKARUS
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
I have passed this info to the owner of pool.
The network doesn't have any problem as soon as block explorer shows last block 173824!
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
The blockchain on the pool "cach.digger.work" was stuck on block 173803.

"Unable to connect to wallet RPC service: RPC call failed: Failed to connect to 192.168.1.100 port 20300: Connection refused"
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
What do you mean?

Since today the developer is working on modification of POW algo (1st point of Roadmap) and planning to load updates to his github by the end of week!

That's good to hear Smiley
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
What do you mean?

Since today the developer is working on modification of POW algo (1st point of Roadmap) and planning to load updates to his github by the end of week!
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
so any updates on what's happening?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
You could use P2Pool - IKARUS

That is quite stable!

5% fees...
hm...
and low pool hashrate
The low hashrate is only a bug in stats and the fees are to support this project. I restore this project after crypsy goes offline and nobody use the network and I fight against vertone hard fork  Wink and there is no obligation to use the pool if the fees to high for you.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
moderator of CACH
That is condition of the owner! I only could say that it's stable enough and haven't went down.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
You could use P2Pool - IKARUS

That is quite stable!

5% fees...
hm...
and low pool hashrate
Pages:
Jump to: