Win8.1 nvidia 372.54
http://www.temppic.com/img.php?20-08-2016:1471699994_0.52303600.jpg
Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 119. (Read 500113 times)
I found this error
Win8.1 nvidia 372.54
http://www.temppic.com/img.php?20-08-2016:1471699994_0.52303600.jpg
Win8.1 nvidia 372.54
http://www.temppic.com/img.php?20-08-2016:1471699994_0.52303600.jpg
https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMiner/releases
It seems to be 1.7.6 ccminer with some improved from pallas and nanashi,
afaik based on driver for Titan X from 2.08.2016.
It seems to be 1.7.6 ccminer with some improved from pallas and nanashi,
afaik based on driver for Titan X from 2.08.2016.
what version last one?
try intensity 19 to see if thats somehow the issue? if not, then roll back drivers
tried, nothing same error, code need to be updated i think
try intensity 19 to see if thats somehow the issue? if not, then roll back drivers
lyra2 and lyra2v2 are "doesn't validate on cpu" with latest 372.53 drivers, win7, gtx1070
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Are you saying updating the drivers broke the algo for both miners?
lyra2 and lyra2v2 are "doesn't validate on cpu" with latest 372.53 drivers, win7, gtx1070
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Are you saying updating the drivers broke the algo for both miners?
lyra2 and lyra2v2 are "doesn't validate on cpu" with latest 372.53 drivers, win7, gtx1070
Nanashi version also broken.
[...]
Same here. "doesn't validate on cpu" BUT Lyras are works with nicehashminer 1.6.1.4 Nanashi version also broken.
[...]
not sure what version nanashi, but works. Or try to set intensity to 20 or less.
lyra2 and lyra2v2 are "doesn't validate on cpu" with latest 372.53 drivers, win7, gtx1070
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Its strange, try daggerhashimoto ( ETH,ETC ) , work ?
.
lyra2 and lyra2v2 are "doesn't validate on cpu" with latest 372.53 drivers, win7, gtx1070
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
Nanashi version also broken.
Neoscrypt is feeling good and easily goes > 1.1mhs.
well i feel dumb - just realised my cards have been running for over a week without gpu-tweak running in the background as i had thought it was. I'm now pushing a lot better hashrates!
card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
there is no need to oc memory for lbry, better to downclock it as much as possible (-1000).card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
what will be the consumption then? maybe at -1000 it become unstable
My rigs running no-stop with -500 mem for weeks.
you're right about memory - i pushed it way down and there zero effect on hashrate. but also no obvious changes to thermal load or power draw (maybe a few watts, but i cant tell via software)
Ive got the two cards running at about 281MH and 266MH now - 547 MH combined
well i feel dumb - just realised my cards have been running for over a week without gpu-tweak running in the background as i had thought it was. I'm now pushing a lot better hashrates!
card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
there is no need to oc memory for lbry, better to downclock it as much as possible (-1000).card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
what will be the consumption then? maybe at -1000 it become unstable
My rigs running no-stop with -500 mem for weeks.
what will be the consumption then? maybe at -1000 it become unstable
no problem with stability but helps to squeeze some extra gpu core mhz. well i feel dumb - just realised my cards have been running for over a week without gpu-tweak running in the background as i had thought it was. I'm now pushing a lot better hashrates!
card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
there is no need to oc memory for lbry, better to downclock it as much as possible (-1000).card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
what will be the consumption then? maybe at -1000 it become unstable
well i feel dumb - just realised my cards have been running for over a week without gpu-tweak running in the background as i had thought it was. I'm now pushing a lot better hashrates!
card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
there is no need to oc memory for lbry, better to downclock it as much as possible (-1000). card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
updated to the newest 372 geforce driver and ccminer 1.8.1 for my pair of Strix GTX 1070 cards
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
also, my understanding of lbry is that the payout rates (or coin generation at least) grow over time for another ~2 months. is this the reason why the value of LBC keeps slipping downwards on poloniex?
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
also, my understanding of lbry is that the payout rates (or coin generation at least) grow over time for another ~2 months. is this the reason why the value of LBC keeps slipping downwards on poloniex?
that is because of hee last build, i doubt it's because of the new update from nvidia
yes the reward keep increase until 500, now we are at 250, sto still 1.5 months of dumping
okay - thats what i thought, and explains why im still making a decent daily profit despite the 70% collapse in lbc price and increasing difficulty over the last 2-3 weeks since i bought my 1070 cards.
so far im quite pleased. the first card i bought 22days ago for $677 CAD has produced about $95 and the second i bought a week after has made me about $65 (after considering power costs). Thats already on par with second-hand "BNIB/LNIB" card pricing, and i hope that in the next 1.5 months i can cost-adjust the cards down to <$450/ea (already a $50-100/card profit if i resold locally at that point)
if lbry profits keep falling another ~20% though it will be about equal to mining lyra2/r2 or at ~40% less, eth/sia merge-mining
i'm not worried about lbry falling, like i was not worried about eth falling, and like i was not worried back in the good old days, when all the other good coins, fell
you know why? because there is always a new shit coin that will emerge and be more profitable than the last one
just how i like to say, that "the most profitable coin still need to be released", there will be another "lbry in the future...
updated to the newest 372 geforce driver and ccminer 1.8.1 for my pair of Strix GTX 1070 cards
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
well i feel dumb - just realised my cards have been running for over a week without gpu-tweak running in the background as i had thought it was. I'm now pushing a lot better hashrates!
card1: 2038core(+231), 0.990v, 8380mem (+779), 65C, 110% power target, 60% fans = 281 MH
card2: 1924core(+209), 0.925v, 8344mem (+752), 69C, 96% power target, 66% fans = 260 MH
seems strange that the temperature is higher on the lower-clocked card. AFAIK these are both the same bottom-tier strix card model
any thoughts on diff - I bumped up to 378 and there isnt really any noticed difference
updated to the newest 372 geforce driver and ccminer 1.8.1 for my pair of Strix GTX 1070 cards
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
also, my understanding of lbry is that the payout rates (or coin generation at least) grow over time for another ~2 months. is this the reason why the value of LBC keeps slipping downwards on poloniex?
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
also, my understanding of lbry is that the payout rates (or coin generation at least) grow over time for another ~2 months. is this the reason why the value of LBC keeps slipping downwards on poloniex?
that is because of hee last build, i doubt it's because of the new update from nvidia
yes the reward keep increase until 500, now we are at 250, sto still 1.5 months of dumping
okay - thats what i thought, and explains why im still making a decent daily profit despite the 70% collapse in lbc price and increasing difficulty over the last 2-3 weeks since i bought my 1070 cards.
so far im quite pleased. the first card i bought 22days ago for $677 CAD has produced about $95 and the second i bought a week after has made me about $65 (after considering power costs). Thats already on par with second-hand "BNIB/LNIB" card pricing, and i hope that in the next 1.5 months i can cost-adjust the cards down to <$450/ea (already a $50-100/card profit if i resold locally at that point)
if lbry profits keep falling another ~20% though it will be about equal to mining lyra2/r2 or at ~40% less, eth/sia merge-mining
updated to the newest 372 geforce driver and ccminer 1.8.1 for my pair of Strix GTX 1070 cards
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
also, my understanding of lbry is that the payout rates (or coin generation at least) grow over time for another ~2 months. is this the reason why the value of LBC keeps slipping downwards on poloniex?
went from about 235-245/card to 245-255/card - so there seems to be a slight improvement, about 4% maybe, which could be attributed to a combination of the newer drivers and the alexis update to lbry.
I noticed the batch file also sets the diff at 256 - is that the optimum if i have two cards, or would something like 378 or 512 be better?
also, my understanding of lbry is that the payout rates (or coin generation at least) grow over time for another ~2 months. is this the reason why the value of LBC keeps slipping downwards on poloniex?
that is because of his last build, i doubt it's because of the new update from nvidia
yes the reward keep increase until 500, now we are at 250, sto still 1.5 months of dumping
Jump to: