Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented - page 46. (Read 92947 times)

Try using their onion tor link when you want to mix your coins: Tor link: http://chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion/
I think main clearnet website is constantly under ddos attacks, and this things are possible for few seconds.
I prefer using CM with my electrum but thats another story

Chipmixer.com was briefly down for a few minutes just now. I got this error when entering the URL:



Did the site undergo regular maintenance or was this an unexpected error? Highly leans towards an unexpected error because as soon as I finished this post the site was back up again.

Perhaps it's considered a worthwhile investment for overall community privacy.

You're also under an assumption, thousands of btc haven't moved through there and even just a few percent of that would cover the campaign... They also know they have at least the same amount of crypto or more than what they started out with so still could collateralise it or invest it somehow if they really wanted to.

@ChipMixer, consider reading a thread I just created: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5284347

There is a scam site with address that look similar to our Tor address - .online instead of .onion.

It was reported in July but it is still active: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/warning-chipmixer-clone-site-5264335

Thank you @LoyceV, in fact, I confirm is a website of scam.

I am really not sure how I haven't stumbled upon this thread earlier. I've used your service back in 2017/2018 when I was using electrum wallet...

I've bumped and merited your OG post! You guys have helped me a lot back in day.

I highly doubt that.

That site has nothing to do with ChipMixer. See ⚠️ List of Bitcoin Mixer or tumbler SCAM/CLONE websites ⚠️ for many scam/phishing sites to avoid.

you have SCAMED me
and here also he had scammed me : bitcoinmixer.eu
You are scammeur you two

It is possible. This is good idea.

Hello @TryNinja, yes with tor on onion. In the hash is noted that : bitcoin received and not spent, but in the session there is no [Suspicious link removed]ived
Good night

I think LoyceV nailed it.  
my core binds -bind=127.0.0.1 -listen=1 as full jailed tor node in the field to maintain communication privacy and transactional integrity.

in field, most block chain lookup site are very slow when used with tor, blockstream are great to verify payment but sometime they are slow.  Somehow full core node thru tor works much better because I'm comfortable with core RPC.

I right click and copy the entire rawtransaction and broadcast it thru sites such as

http://explorerzydxu5ecjrkwceayqybizmpjjznk5izmitf2modhcusuqlid.onion/tx/push

It works especially well with USB satellite receivers

most and if not all fractional reserve banking cartel controlled city, camera is at every street corner.

Less and less people are wearing mask because we don't have lock down.  I want to protect the entity of the person doing transaction with, esp in the case of those who were involved and at risk.

seen many legit usecase, hong kong protest victims, political and ethnic suppression victims, and corporate finanical suppression to mom and pop agricultural land owner mining bitcoin with cheap electricity in high mountains.  

All internet traffic are archived and searched.  Corrupt power and deep state are in charge.
Expect all transaction traffic being deciphered.  And don't believe anyone need a warrant.
You have no due process right.  You are presumed guility and proven otherwise (proof innocence is shifted to bitcoiner's burden).  

Once you've got on those deep state "black list" and even if you are law abiding citizen should expect plenty of harassment and restriction with everything you do, even you travel to another country.  I don't need to put someone or perhaps one of us into that situation.

The truth is out there.

Did you access the website through Tor? If so, was it from the clean net domain (chipmixer.com) or the .onion domain?

And you didn't let your session expire, right?

Hello @jackg, I had send the coins, and save the token session when I had reopen the session no bitcoin received and the deposit wallet is another. I hope I will refind my money thank you brother

yep, and for an rookie like me its an hard learning curve ; )

Additional:

as @HCP pointed out already thats not an good idea okay,  but why ?  ..

i thought if i sweep an Fund, then i created also an transaction on the blockchain so why it isnt a good idea to mix this with some UTXO's

best regards  

They normally take a few days to respond to their email afaik, if you've used them some common problems might be:
1. The site autorefresh at the start failed on the depo screen (so you can just refresh it yourself to continue)
2. If you tried funding the deposit address twice but went past step 3 and can't see your private keys/chips chipmixer would be able to help with that providing your session hasn't expired).

These are the most common I see, generally if there's a problem with funds your token or a signed message from the deposit addresses should be sufficient afaik.

Yeah!

Nothing is ever track-free. Even using a system like tails still has tracking potential... And any vulnerabilities Firefox could have that might not have been noticed could be duplicated in the branch split to tor...

Hello @ChipMixer, i had send you mail to : [email protected] at 05:07:00 PM (25 minutes ago)
please resolve my problem i am waiting your answer thank you

Privacy?

moejoejay : don't worry your questions aren't stupid. It's true that anonymizing transactions is a hard task. Chipmixer offers a way to get "clean" coins, but the day you want to spend them, you must be careful or you could mark them again.

I'm thinking a good way to do it might be two passes of chipmixer. When you get your coins, or small bit by small bit with your stash. Then another time when you want to spend them. Or alternatively use the voucher feature, if you trust chipmixer in the long run.

What's stopping you from just looking up the imported addresses on a blockexplorer (manually or programatically using an API) and finding the block height where they were "funded"?