Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented - page 92. (Read 92708 times)

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 976

EDIT3: Alpha test thread --> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/looking-for-alpha-testers-for-a-new-bitcoin-mixer-1923170

it was a single man show from the begining. even the reaction time if issues occure proves this.

IMO, chipmixer and campaign manager does not involves more then 2 people. maybe even just one. and if not just one both are strong connected in the same local community.

I am really trying to understand what your end goal is here because I don't believe someone would embark on an activity without and end in mind and I feel its better you come out with that for everyone to see so that any concerns you have can be adequately responded to and attended to as necessary. The link you are trying to make are purely circumstantial that would not even take one to have any special skills to find out if one dedicate your time to it. @DarkStar has said where he is from and I wonder if the @chipmixer would do you the honor of saying where he is resident and answer such as that could mean he is just out of business.

Obvious sig spammer is obvious. Roll Eyes

I have the user on ignore, but it's hard to keep ignoring if y'all are gonna keep quoting. Y'all should just stop addressing him, and if he continues to spam here, I'd recommend reporting him to his campaign manager.
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 569

EDIT3: Alpha test thread --> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/looking-for-alpha-testers-for-a-new-bitcoin-mixer-1923170

it was a single man show from the begining. even the reaction time if issues occure proves this.

IMO, chipmixer and campaign manager does not involves more then 2 people. maybe even just one. and if not just one both are strong connected in the same local community.

I am really trying to understand what your end goal is here because I don't believe someone would embark on an activity without and end in mind and I feel its better you come out with that for everyone to see so that any concerns you have can be adequately responded to and attended to as necessary. The link you are trying to make are purely circumstantial that would not even take one to have any special skills to find out if one dedicate your time to it. @DarkStar has said where he is from and I wonder if the @chipmixer would do you the honor of saying where he is resident and answer such as that could mean he is just out of business.
HCP
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4318
escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.

EDIT: it's more an indicator that cipmixer created this escrow address and not the campiagn manager. or they are both the same.
It doesn't indicate anything of the sort. Chipmixer may have created their "1Chip" address 2 years ago... or the day it got funded, there is no way to tell from simply looking at transactions on the blockchain.


Quote
EDIT2: if this chipmixer address has an operational need (which it has) then you will create and fund it with the start of the operation or before. after your business is working and you have too less customers your are thinking about to improve it. then comes the escrow address into the game. in this order.
You would not necessarily fund it, if the "operational need" is that it is simply used to create signed messages. You don't need funds in an address to sign messages.

It is fairly obvious looking at the transaction history for this address, that it isn't an "operational" account at all. It has had 2 incoming transactions, which occurred 3 months after the Alpha tests and the service was opened. More likely, someone liked their service and dropped a donation instead of using the internal "donate chip" option.

Without knowing the actual details... I'd say that Chipmixer saw that DarkStar_ had created the "1Chip" address to escrow the sig campaign funds, and liked the idea of a vanity address so went and made one for themselves.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.
Why exactly does this matter?
I don't think the ChipMixer signing address was supposed to be funded. My guess is someone send their coins to that address by mistake.

They'd have done that after mixing their coins though.
I followed one of the chains and it brought me here: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/18HecYpFRs4s54oiLKnXLpfzFUb1VFQMvt - maybe it was a small chip, they liked the service and wanted to donate?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.
Why exactly does this matter?
I don't think the ChipMixer signing address was supposed to be funded. My guess is someone send their coins to that address by mistake.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3282
My 1ChipW address was generated using vanitygen when I searched for 1Chip... as I did not have a good GPU at the time. It was the second result that came, and looked decent, so I went with it. The first was something like 1Chipb or something on those lines and the 1Chipb part didn't stand out. Seriously, how is this supposed to indicate alts? Also, you don't need a funded address to sign messages.

You have 1Gyrsur3XcEoGjCarnXvGTVAS3rvjsdVm3, which is also a vanity. Thus, DarkStar_ = ChipMixer = Gyrsur confirmed!111!111one!1111
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.
Why exactly does this matter?

Looks like you are just creating problems out of your mind for the sake of increasing your post count and getting paid on your signature campaign Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
interesting too. seems not for the first time.

EDIT: campaign manager profiles and addresses.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/darkstar-507936
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/darkstaralt-862062
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3NSvhvYYBMVh1bPyKWjPfyiF3RHAAgsgtw

EDIT2: chipmixer.com address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty

interesting, the campaign payouts goes directly from chipmixer.com address to members and not via the campaign managers address. this could mean the campaign manager holds the priv key to this address. both prefer vanity addresses.
I'm pretty sure this is just you trolling us again (is this your new hobby?). But this address doesn't belong to ChipMixer (obviously). It's an address created by DarkStar to escrow the funds and pay the campaign users.

~snip~

I will be holding the funds for this campaign, and paying participants. The escrow address will be topped up as the campaign progresses.

Code:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I, DarkStar_ (u=507936) am escrowing funds for the ChipMixer campaign that I am managing in the address 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.70
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto

wsBcBAABCgAGBQJZJ6MjAAoJEIZVviH1IAyt6z4H/ii3xV9/IOQyVOXTdPZzd/al
chpHY7gblLQ/C3BNR9Tx+v5mDvgDFFEJW7AH5AVDfqvz8w5NSFPSRn2Au22u5HyU
Ab30xludXpSx8ADEm7m8/T6GNppGRVL2KKlxQSRZMcE9RwTRKOKLu5lUD6U45XUU
hlO1XgvBv6XHUA6sm56R2Nwnwy0cZnvStH2fgGkadwsyzCmFpqSTCoXQDZJnwgzL
30RxBt8GrKtIEIoLWpi+0EULf2bP/Q4+rklJBoeUARiw0t1xs2dsBJkPNEDGOlEQ
+4uc/jirIAeBGRMfYLOrv/QO1CmLwJ7s/j9BI76/IPIMU2oI6rERhykFmU8Cyu4=
=Z/gC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


ChipMixer's address is: 1ChipMwvHe5tewb1Uqa9bbZZJDmgPV1TC7 as stated in their website (https://chipmixer.com/about);
While the escrow address is: 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty (notice the blatantly difference).

Good detective work btw.



P.S: Got you out of my ignore list after DarkStar's post. But I'm willing to put you back soon.

escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.

EDIT: it's more an indicator that cipmixer created this escrow address and not the campiagn manager. or they are both the same.

EDIT2: if this chipmixer address has an operational need (which it has) then you will create and fund it with the start of the operation or before. after your business is working and you have too less customers your are thinking about to improve it. then comes the escrow address into the game. in this order.

We sign receipts with 1ChipMwvHe5tewb1Uqa9bbZZJDmgPV1TC7 address.
Our BitcoinTalk account is ChipMixer.

What is a signed receipt?

Our goal is to make Bitcoin value independent of its blockchain history. Some governments and corporations wants to invalidate its value by claiming they are connected to something immoral like gambling. Every time you withdraw from ChipMixer, we give you cryptographically signed receipt that proves you have received those funds from us. Since the disconnection of history is proven, there can be no loss of value.

EDIT3: Alpha test thread --> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/looking-for-alpha-testers-for-a-new-bitcoin-mixer-1923170

it was a single man show from the begining. even the reaction time if issues occure proves this.

IMO, chipmixer and campaign manager does not involves more then 2 people. maybe even just one. and if not just one both are strong connected in the same local community.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
interesting too. seems not for the first time.

EDIT: campaign manager profiles and addresses.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/darkstar-507936
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/darkstaralt-862062
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3NSvhvYYBMVh1bPyKWjPfyiF3RHAAgsgtw

EDIT2: chipmixer.com address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty

interesting, the campaign payouts goes directly from chipmixer.com address to members and not via the campaign managers address. this could mean the campaign manager holds the priv key to this address. both prefer vanity addresses.
I'm pretty sure this is just you trolling us again (is this your new hobby?). But this address doesn't belong to ChipMixer (obviously). It's an address created by DarkStar to escrow the funds and pay the campaign users.

~snip~

I will be holding the funds for this campaign, and paying participants. The escrow address will be topped up as the campaign progresses.

Code:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I, DarkStar_ (u=507936) am escrowing funds for the ChipMixer campaign that I am managing in the address 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.70
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto

wsBcBAABCgAGBQJZJ6MjAAoJEIZVviH1IAyt6z4H/ii3xV9/IOQyVOXTdPZzd/al
chpHY7gblLQ/C3BNR9Tx+v5mDvgDFFEJW7AH5AVDfqvz8w5NSFPSRn2Au22u5HyU
Ab30xludXpSx8ADEm7m8/T6GNppGRVL2KKlxQSRZMcE9RwTRKOKLu5lUD6U45XUU
hlO1XgvBv6XHUA6sm56R2Nwnwy0cZnvStH2fgGkadwsyzCmFpqSTCoXQDZJnwgzL
30RxBt8GrKtIEIoLWpi+0EULf2bP/Q4+rklJBoeUARiw0t1xs2dsBJkPNEDGOlEQ
+4uc/jirIAeBGRMfYLOrv/QO1CmLwJ7s/j9BI76/IPIMU2oI6rERhykFmU8Cyu4=
=Z/gC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


ChipMixer's address is: 1ChipMwvHe5tewb1Uqa9bbZZJDmgPV1TC7 as stated in their website (https://chipmixer.com/about);
While the escrow address is: 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty (notice the blatantly difference).

Good detective work btw.



P.S: Got you out of my ignore list after DarkStar's post. But I'm willing to put you back soon.
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Eh? Source of the "Chips" is "Fish and Chips", mate. "Fish and Chip Mixer" was too long and "Fish Mixer" sounds well fishy /s

Because I'm Canadian, ChipMixer is Canadian obviously /s

hm, interesting!

EDIT: not much fun in Alberta, Canada.  ;-) /s


Do we have another confirmed alt of DarkStar_? Grin

interesting too. seems not for the first time.

EDIT: campaign manager profiles and addresses.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/darkstar-507936
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/darkstaralt-862062
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3NSvhvYYBMVh1bPyKWjPfyiF3RHAAgsgtw

EDIT2: chipmixer.com address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty

interesting, the campaign payouts goes directly from chipmixer.com address to members and not via the campaign managers address. this could mean the campaign manager holds the priv key to this address. both prefer vanity addresses.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
Eh? Source of the "Chips" is "Fish and Chips", mate. "Fish and Chip Mixer" was too long and "Fish Mixer" sounds well fishy /s

Because I'm Canadian, ChipMixer is Canadian obviously /s

hm, interesting!

EDIT: not much fun in Alberta, Canada.  ;-) /s


Do we have another confirmed alt of DarkStar_? Grin

EDIT: source of the "Chips" may be gambling
Eh? Source of the "Chips" is "Fish and Chips", mate. "Fish and Chip Mixer" was too long and "Fish Mixer" sounds well fishy /s
And somehow this makes more sense than anything Gyrsur has said so far.

Quote
Our wallet software: chip based wallet that handles wallet separation and fakes chip creaton
When I first read this, I thought it was related to the software you use on the server. On second reading (and after some sleep), I'm starting to think you're going to publish your own privacy focused wallet. As far as I know, no mixer has done that before.
We are experimenting with a fork of Electrum wallet, eh. They already told us they will not merge any mixer integration - even as a plugin - but this will allow keeping wallet up to date with all new features and extend them with special handling of chips.

Now this sounds interesting.
Have you anything functioning well so far?
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Eh? Source of the "Chips" is "Fish and Chips", mate. "Fish and Chip Mixer" was too long and "Fish Mixer" sounds well fishy /s

Because I'm Canadian, ChipMixer is Canadian obviously /s

hm, interesting!

EDIT: not much fun in Alberta, Canada.  ;-) /s
sr. member
Activity: 456
Merit: 956
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935098
EDIT: source of the "Chips" may be gambling
Eh? Source of the "Chips" is "Fish and Chips", mate. "Fish and Chip Mixer" was too long and "Fish Mixer" sounds well fishy /s

Google ads require compromising your real life identity, right?
Unless you pay someone to advertise for you with his account.
Aye.

Quote
Our wallet software: chip based wallet that handles wallet separation and fakes chip creaton
When I first read this, I thought it was related to the software you use on the server. On second reading (and after some sleep), I'm starting to think you're going to publish your own privacy focused wallet. As far as I know, no mixer has done that before.
We are experimenting with a fork of Electrum wallet, eh. They already told us they will not merge any mixer integration - even as a plugin - but this will allow keeping wallet up to date with all new features and extend them with special handling of chips.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3282
Plan if there is a government decision against it?
Which government?
Governments above, if Bitcoin transactions regulated.

so far strong evidence they are Canadians.

What's the evidence?

I think the site was registered in Panama (if that's what pa stands for on whois) which means they are most likely North American (USA/Canada).

Because I'm Canadian, ChipMixer is Canadian obviously /s
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
Plan if there is a government decision against it?
Which government?
Governments above, if Bitcoin transactions regulated.

so far strong evidence they are Canadians.

What's the evidence?

I think the site was registered in Panama (if that's what pa stands for on whois) which means they are most likely North American (USA/Canada).
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Plan if there is a government decision against it?
Which government?
Governments above, if Bitcoin transactions regulated.

so far strong evidence they are Canadians.

EDIT: source of the "Chips" may be gambling. in the past of bitcointalk.org some Canadian users operated large Bitcoin gambling sites. guess of the local gambling friendly laws.

EDIT2: at least they are gambling oriented if you look in the FAQ's "Betting". that hardens the evidence of Canadians besides the analysis which I don't want to disclose.

EDIT3: evidence of US citizens is not an option. --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling_in_the_United_States#Legal_issues
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
Google ads require compromising your real life identity, right?
Unless you pay someone to advertise for you with his account.

When I first read this, I thought it was related to the software you use on the server. On second reading (and after some sleep), I'm starting to think you're going to publish your own privacy focused wallet. As far as I know, no mixer has done that before.
My thoughts exactly.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Reddit / Google ads: we are looking for a person to handle this
Google ads require compromising your real life identity, right?

Quote
Our wallet software: chip based wallet that handles wallet separation and fakes chip creaton
When I first read this, I thought it was related to the software you use on the server. On second reading (and after some sleep), I'm starting to think you're going to publish your own privacy focused wallet. As far as I know, no mixer has done that before.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1288
Thanks for answering my questions, this enhances trust Smiley

chips sources?
Our funds and users funds. Withdraw before deposit, chip sizes and mixer receipts ensures that any chip you withdraw from ChipMixer have no link with deposited funds.
Plan if there is a government decision against it?
Which government?
Governments above, if Bitcoin transactions regulated.

LN deposits and LN vouchers: "chips" that do not leave LN but are fungible outside of LN
Very good I was wondering about the future of mixing services if the lightning network succeeded?
sr. member
Activity: 456
Merit: 956
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935098
Does chipmixer planning to share some information publicly?
We share full information how mixer works, why it works and how it ensures fungibility.

How many coins have been mixed?
We do not disclose this information.

chips sources?
Our funds and users funds. Withdraw before deposit, chip sizes and mixer receipts ensures that any chip you withdraw from ChipMixer have no link with deposited funds.

Plan if there is a government decision against it?
Which government?

How long will keep advertising here?
We do not plan to stop.

Future plans?
Reddit / Google ads: we are looking for a person to handle this
Our wallet software: chip based wallet that handles wallet separation and fakes chip creaton
LN deposits and LN vouchers: "chips" that do not leave LN but are fungible outside of LN

Is there any plans on making a more mobile friendly version of the site?
There are no plans for that. We do not advise to use mobile devices while mixing.

Is there any possibilities somebody used my private keys after i imported to my wallet?
You could have used "sweep" option and import private keys anyway. This is the only option to have your private keys used by somebody else (our bot).

After the private keys was imported to my wallet, i deleted the session.
Edit: in my transaction history shows no incoming nor outgoing transaction in the last 24 hours.
If you have seen that chips were prefunded and now transaction is gone then it means you have imported your private keys into another wallet.

I have not heard back from your email. I just need some support with my session before it closes
Our email: [email protected]
Session expires after 7 days. If we did not reply to your email after two days - send us another one.
Pages:
Jump to: