Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] CosmosCR [$CYBR] 🌌Virtual reality world, NFT's, Data solution#blockchain - page 33. (Read 32270 times)

legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
Also we are working on onchain voting for a governance system, but this we want to decide with the community like a constitution (experimental atm)

Has on-chain voting ever worked out well? Looking at past attempts it seems more trouble than good. Not just because it can and will be gamed, but also because it is a hassle that gets in the way of user experience.

Put another way: has the lack of democracy in a virtual world ever hurt the experience?


Well there are much different onchain votings systems, some better then others i think coins like Tezos and Decred are great, prevent forking and also let people help taking decisions.

Gamed voting is mostly cause people create a system where people dont have to put their money where their mouth is, thats why for exemple decred got tickets and tezos a bond and roll.
This will let people have more good intention for the voting cause they actually have to own the coin and put it at stake. Tricking this system is expensive and also put your own coins at risk.

Like i said its experimental but we def. going to have a look at it.

member
Activity: 392
Merit: 11
#Proof of Participation  

Language: RUSSIAN
Content: ANN+Bounty+Moderation+WP+Website
Native language: Russian
Translation/moderation experience: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/offerenru-quality-english-russian-translation-5048565
Bitcointalk username:  crypt0sc0pe  
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/crypt0sc0pe-996566
Telegram: @crypt0sc0pe
ERC-20 wallet address: 0x1F4b1283BB7874D0bC81B2ec51Ad8E36343f3bd3

      
            

Pm us if your interresting to do the translation.

Russian ANN translation...  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anncybrcosmoscr-5077560
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
How much would buying own planet cost in this project? Or are the planets going to be shared with other participants?

We didnt specify the price of the planets yet, but this will also depends on the size, but it wont be super expensive it should be affordable for everyone.

So, what will happen to the unsold tokens, will they be burned or frozen for some time period?

Burned, but lets hope this doesnt happen  Grin

We want everyone to get the same value so we dont have any Pre Investors/ico just one simple ICO. We made a huge cost already with having lawyers and we
are taking a risk with this, but we believe this will be great longterm and the most fair option.

It's a good thing to burn the unsold tokens if there will be any to ensure the transparency. I hope this situation doesn't arrive.
so any unsold tokens will be burned, hopefully it will not happen and they will all be sold (reach hard cap) so there will be no pre-ico and various stages of the ico but a single one with the same bonus from start to finish seems fair towards investors and perhaps the best fundraising strategy...

Perhaps the best or the worst  Grin It's easier to sell to angel investors with a high bonus, but thats not our goal, we want to be straight forward and deliver as simple as that  Wink.



Yea the minimum cap is at least needed to make the product great, everything after will going fully in the ecosystem and adoption rate. Eventually i think investors get a good deal on both situations.

Reach minimum cap they own more %
Reach max. cap the ecosystem will get more promotion and probably a faster adoption.

But both ways we are going to make a awesome product that can grow for years.

A big hard cap is fine if it completely will be used for the tasks you mentioned. Promotion could be key in 2019.

Our funds will be used 100% for the project, we're going to be really open about our financial positions and keep the community updated.

The foundation funds will be also based on voting from the community.

Good to read that a very seniour member is answering on all the questions.
2019 will be the year that crypto goes very much up or goes totally down..

We are just in a bear cycle, blockchain technology is actually maturing a lot and although some stages might look depressing crypto is evolving with projects like Bakkt.
It's impossible to make predictions at short term (although im doing it since 2013), but long term crypto is going to perform really well. 2019 unpredictable but we get closer and closer to the next blockhalving!
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
There are several Blockchain VR projects in the pipeline  and it would be nice if you could give us an overview of  the main advantages of CosmosCR over those that you might think as a direct competitors. With this, the community could distinguish clearly any relevant features of this project that might attract more supporters and investors alike.

A comparison sheet will be a nice add-on for the project.
Also any update regarding an MVP is more than welcome.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 310
There are several Blockchain VR projects in the pipeline  and it would be nice if you could give us an overview of  the main advantages of CosmosCR over those that you might think as a direct competitors. With this, the community could distinguish clearly any relevant features of this project that might attract more supporters and investors alike.
jr. member
Activity: 132
Merit: 1
I really like virtual reality and all that is related. I will watch this thread even more. Don't wait a long time, let's immediately join this great project.
A good project and indeed worth doing.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 250
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
Is this an Erc20 token and will remain on the ethereum chain or are there any plans to develop and move to own blockchain in future?

I think changing to your own blockchain is very important, such as you don't get affected due to some lags in the ethereum blockchain or overloading. In the future they can definitely think this.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000


The virtual real estate space (or land parcels) are like the domain names of the platform and the portal to the games.
Thats how we create a true virtual reality world and make it super excited.

You buy a piece of land with the $CYBR token and deploy your game on it. Your land piece also will have a value cause you truely own it as a token.


Ok, seems I understand now. So people will be able to create a game in every virtual-reality city or on any planet?

You can buidl games in both actually, but cause the mainland space is limited and it will be hard to get a big space, also its more expensive so it makes more sense
to use the mainland as portal and keep all use-cases close to each other and make the planet to buidl the games and experiences.

A webshop for example will be easier in the mainland.

This kind of project is perfect to build a real virtual universe. Did you see ready player one? It will be wonderful if someday we will see something similar to that !

Love that movie big inspiration for us! also nice to see this video about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfeVH2bbzlw , cool to see in how serieus details they worked Legendary really!
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 262
Is this an Erc20 token and will remain on the ethereum chain or are there any plans to develop and move to own blockchain in future?
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
Also we are working on onchain voting for a governance system, but this we want to decide with the community like a constitution (experimental atm)

Has on-chain voting ever worked out well? Looking at past attempts it seems more trouble than good. Not just because it can and will be gamed, but also because it is a hassle that gets in the way of user experience.

Put another way: has the lack of democracy in a virtual world ever hurt the experience?





I think the trick is not letting the community vote on matter which could lead to big disasters eventually, or hurt the community itself. Otherwise i don't see anything wrong with it.

there's no need for actual voting, people vote with their dollars so if a project is doing right it will be worth more.

At the moment not, but in the future voting about upcoming decisions can be very good and can motivate the community to become a part of the project.
I am not sure about Rigorous objection, but he could also be right with the statement, that voting from the masses also can go in a wrong direction.
Its a little bit risky to give the power to the community, but its worth a trial. I think the masses will have the power in the future (decentralization).
Lets hope that swarm will have enough intelligence to go into the right direction.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
Also we are working on onchain voting for a governance system, but this we want to decide with the community like a constitution (experimental atm)

Has on-chain voting ever worked out well? Looking at past attempts it seems more trouble than good. Not just because it can and will be gamed, but also because it is a hassle that gets in the way of user experience.

Put another way: has the lack of democracy in a virtual world ever hurt the experience?





I think the trick is not letting the community vote on matter which could lead to big disasters eventually, or hurt the community itself. Otherwise i don't see anything wrong with it.

there's no need for actual voting, people vote with their dollars so if a project is doing right it will be worth more.
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 166
Also we are working on onchain voting for a governance system, but this we want to decide with the community like a constitution (experimental atm)

Has on-chain voting ever worked out well? Looking at past attempts it seems more trouble than good. Not just because it can and will be gamed, but also because it is a hassle that gets in the way of user experience.

Put another way: has the lack of democracy in a virtual world ever hurt the experience?





I think the trick is not letting the community vote on matter which could lead to big disasters eventually, or hurt the community itself. Otherwise i don't see anything wrong with it.
member
Activity: 349
Merit: 12
I see that according to your roadmap the token sale was orginally planned for Q4 2018 but has been obviously postponed. Have you already set a new date for ICO?

Yes we already set a new date and till then we are just gonna continu with the development. tonight the team will agree on updates of the roadmap and we will update the community
as soon as possible.

The market at this moment is full of fear and depression that's the reason we think launching the ICO now will be a problem, like we said before we dont do any angel investment round or
pre-ico we want to allow everyone to get the same value. Thats why the ICO round should be done right and rushing is never a good thing.

Do I understand right,  that Pre ICO will not be held? Just ICO with four different phases of bonuses each week differently? Quite difficult to reach CAP in such a short time. but hopefully everything will go well and the market will return so the world is not so skeptical about investing.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 115
Also we are working on onchain voting for a governance system, but this we want to decide with the community like a constitution (experimental atm)

Has on-chain voting ever worked out well? Looking at past attempts it seems more trouble than good. Not just because it can and will be gamed, but also because it is a hassle that gets in the way of user experience.

Put another way: has the lack of democracy in a virtual world ever hurt the experience?



sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263


Yea the minimum cap is at least needed to make the product great, everything after will going fully in the ecosystem and adoption rate. Eventually i think investors get a good deal on both situations.

Reach minimum cap they own more %
Reach max. cap the ecosystem will get more promotion and probably a faster adoption.

But both ways we are going to make a awesome product that can grow for years.

A big hard cap is fine if it completely will be used for the tasks you mentioned. Promotion could be key in 2019.

Our funds will be used 100% for the project, we're going to be really open about our financial positions and keep the community updated.

The foundation funds will be also based on voting from the community.

Good to read that a very seniour member is answering on all the questions.
2019 will be the year that crypto goes very much up or goes totally down..
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 605
So, what will happen to the unsold tokens, will they be burned or frozen for some time period?

Burned, but lets hope this doesnt happen  Grin

We want everyone to get the same value so we dont have any Pre Investors/ico just one simple ICO. We made a huge cost already with having lawyers and we
are taking a risk with this, but we believe this will be great longterm and the most fair option.

It's a good thing to burn the unsold tokens if there will be any to ensure the transparency. I hope this situation doesn't arrive.
so any unsold tokens will be burned, hopefully it will not happen and they will all be sold (reach hard cap) so there will be no pre-ico and various stages of the ico but a single one with the same bonus from start to finish seems fair towards investors and perhaps the best fundraising strategy...
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1168
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
How much would buying own planet cost in this project? Or are the planets going to be shared with other participants?
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
I see that according to your roadmap the token sale was orginally planned for Q4 2018 but has been obviously postponed. Have you already set a new date for ICO?

Yes we already set a new date and till then we are just gonna continu with the development. tonight the team will agree on updates of the roadmap and we will update the community
as soon as possible.

The market at this moment is full of fear and depression that's the reason we think launching the ICO now will be a problem, like we said before we dont do any angel investment round or
pre-ico we want to allow everyone to get the same value. Thats why the ICO round should be done right and rushing is never a good thing.

I can totally understand that you decided to postpone your ICO. Right now, it's just really hard to get the desired funding. I just hope that the mood is much better when you actually have your sale.
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.


The virtual real estate space (or land parcels) are like the domain names of the platform and the portal to the games.
Thats how we create a true virtual reality world and make it super excited.

You buy a piece of land with the $CYBR token and deploy your game on it. Your land piece also will have a value cause you truely own it as a token.


Ok, seems I understand now. So people will be able to create a game in every virtual-reality city or on any planet?

You can buidl games in both actually, but cause the mainland space is limited and it will be hard to get a big space, also its more expensive so it makes more sense
to use the mainland as portal and keep all use-cases close to each other and make the planet to buidl the games and experiences.

A webshop for example will be easier in the mainland.

This kind of project is perfect to build a real virtual universe. Did you see ready player one? It will be wonderful if someday we will see something similar to that !
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
I see that according to your roadmap the token sale was orginally planned for Q4 2018 but has been obviously postponed. Have you already set a new date for ICO?

Yes we already set a new date and till then we are just gonna continu with the development. tonight the team will agree on updates of the roadmap and we will update the community
as soon as possible.

The market at this moment is full of fear and depression that's the reason we think launching the ICO now will be a problem, like we said before we dont do any angel investment round or
pre-ico we want to allow everyone to get the same value. Thats why the ICO round should be done right and rushing is never a good thing.
Pages:
Jump to: