Topic: [ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | I2P | Market =Embrace The Dark= - page 107. (Read 826733 times)

I2P has nothing to do with the above, its just a layer upon the rest of the code and it is not hard to port, at all. Not trying to fud. Im tired of people making false claims. I hold crave, actually its the only currency im currently holding. But please, stop with the bullshit talk.

Do you hold crave? LOL
You are a fuddster from shadowtrash community. Probably another account from LS.
Just see your posts here along the dump.
Anoncoin is TRYING to implement i2p but with several problems.





and many other posts.
you are jealous

First, I don't believe that was all that was premined.
Second,
anoncoin has an android wallet?  no.  
anoncoin has asset exchange? no.
anoncoin has pos masternode? no.
anoncoin has a decentralized market planned? no.

Stop trying to take away credit, where credit is due.  
Your pseudo-fud attempt is annoying and doesn't hold much weight.

...
Bullshit, anoncoin had a premine of 0.0014%. Also, they were the first to implement in-wallet i2p. Dont give cred for tech that does not belong to crave. I hold crave, but seriosly, stop with the ridiculous claims. Period.

Haha this is so bizarre. But i love to come and read here in between studies and tell people that they are idiots. Are you kids 12 or what? People calling for the disappeared dev like they would call mommy

Haha yeah.. agreed.

Same old, same old. Tried to tell people. Some of course did alot of money. Some did loose a few. The dev and the team who pumped probably earned the most..

Bullshit, anoncoin had a premine of 0.0014%. Also, they were the first to implement in-wallet i2p. Dont give cred for tech that does not belong to crave. I hold crave, but seriosly, stop with the ridiculous claims. Period.

Well,  its the first coin with good distribution to have implemented it,  along with pos masternodes, darkpoold, blur / asset exchange...  again other coins with these features are either premined, ico or just terrible distribution.  (cough syscoin)

Actually.. the current I2P implementations that are out there are not that hard to port. I ported I2P to syscoin in december 2014. Its based in GIVs work and anoncoins implementation of it which have been there for over a year.

no innovations? Are you serious?
yesterday was released a wallet with native i2p network. Several coins are trying it for months without success.
And all other features as first mobile app with stake + masternodes, blur, first pos + masternodes coin?

hi guys i'm new in crypto, but one thing I can see, CRAVE is the number one in all coins
And the others coins are copy paste from CRAVE
look to the others coins and btc to, what they have NEW? NOTHING
Look to CRAVE, just innovation, and the others coins just try copy CRAVE, but I have see CRAVE is the first to launch everything and NO ONE CAN SAY, THAT IS NOT TRUE.
CRAVE will be BIG.
 

no innovations? Are you serious?
yesterday was released a wallet with native i2p network. Several coins are trying it for months without success.
And all other features as first mobile app with stake + masternodes, blur, first pos + masternodes coin?

Good thoughtful questions...

ICM:

1) What's your response to people saying Crave has no
innovation and is just a copy paste thrown together?

- The only issue I see now with Crave is the annonymous part.

...

I've been away for a while (since the big pump ) so please excuse my ignorance. I see a lot of progress is being made and the market looks oversold and so I'm on the sidelines again, but I have a question before jumping back in: Are the crave markets going to use crave or btc as the currency for purchasing stuff? Or both? Sorry if this is already answered somewhere obvious.

I am asking because, lets be real, nobody is going to use an altcoin on illicit markets.. They very well might use the markets themselves, but they will not use an altcoin for the transactions. For many reasons...

1) Decreased anonymity. Sure, this coin is more "anonymous" than bitcoin, but nothing is absolutely anonymous and since there are so few people who use it, it is actually waaaaaaay easier to keep track of everybody involved.

2) Volatility. Vendors and even customers cannot and will not tolerate the extreme volatility. Even bitcoin's volatility is a big problem for illicit vendors because they are not able to quickly liquidate their funds since they first have to launder them.
 
3) Liquidity (closely related to #2). Vendors need to be able to cash out without dumping the market to oblivion. Not as big an issue for customers because when they pump the price up buying, it just means they pay less crave when they purchase something with it (but this is just doubly screwing the vendor now because of the inflated value of crave).


Now, obviously all of these issues would diminish as adoption increases. But even bitcoin hasn't completely achieved this.

For the above reasons, if the markets are to actually be functional and not just proof-of-concept, I think it would be best if BTC were used within the markets. Or at least for it to be an option. If that's even possible? Or will it simply be up to the people who run the markets?

Again, sorry if these questions have already been answered ad nauseam.

Received and confirmed. I posted as such to your trust level as well.

Regarding the fight, as I mentioned to you before I wanted my bet to lose. That being said, this fight was bs all the way around. For pac afterwards to immediately be asking for a rematch? Why not win and which would guarantee a rematch and then pac holds the purse strings. This was a glorified came of tag or olypmic boxing. There was never a fight. I hate it for both of us.

All I can offer is some real boxing to watch, which I linked above
Hagler vs Hearnes ...Hagler was the shorter (less reach) fighter and he took it to the other head first...hurt and wobbled and all in the first round alone. Pac knew this before coming in, if he wanted to win he had to put it all on the line. I honestly wish he had. What pissed me off the most was Freddy Roach (which I did super admire until this point) stopped pac to take a f'n selfie on the way to the ring...wwwhhaattt?

Neither fought, simple as that. If pac actually tried to win then we would have seen what could have possibly happened. Harder to do at the lower weight classes but still as effective in my eyes.

Hagler vs Hearnes ...Hagler much smaller fighter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYt5Rz2XlAg   go to 20:45 to get to the fight.

Or watch rjj highlight films:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Jones,_Jr.
"He is the only boxer in history to start his career as a light middleweight (154 lbs) and go on to win a heavyweight title."
He was the best at super middle imo.
Note: Watch the left hook (weak hand). And he has even fought twice in the last month or so. Is he way out of shape? sure, but at 45? maybe not.

Roy Jones, Jr. was the classic smaller guy in any matchup until he stomped competition out and moved up weight classes which forced him again and again to be the smaller dude. It is sad because he never saw a payday close to the bs we just watched and all because there was never any competition....guess he should have acted weak to draw in a purse.

No matter what, boxing has turned to crap and will never be back.

Awesome, pretty fast development here.

I2P is live.
Thanks dev, you are the guy, there´s no doubt that crave is a place to be.