[ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | I2P | Market =Embrace The Dark= - page 103.

Delita Heiral

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

hahahahahahahahaha

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 03:21:24 PM

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

coinspredator

sr. member

Activity: 432

Merit: 250

Quote from: EmilioMann on May 03, 2015, 03:30:58 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 03:21:24 PM

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

MAN/WOMAN... YOU ARE SICK! Grin

Dev are you human ? I love crave... I gonna retire here. Grin

STEALTHMODE

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks

https://twitter.com/industrialcoinm/status/594960825749786625 Grin

tkon3

hero member

Activity: 824

Merit: 1000

Calm down ICM pleaseeeeeee Grin

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 03:21:24 PM

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

MAN/WOMAN... YOU ARE SICK! Grin

STEALTHMODE

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks

And we go on... Cheesy

Just great!

trader19

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1001

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 03:21:24 PM

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

HAHA u guys have been warned Grin

don't give ICM ideas, look what happens Cheesy

ICM on fire

Digital_Currency_LTD

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 03:21:24 PM

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

NICE!!!

PhilipMorris

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 03:21:24 PM

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

Whats the ETA for the market ?

industrialcoinmagic

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

Let's do it, after the market drop. Cheesy

striker7334 2.0

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 300

Unprofessional shitcoin trader since 2011

Quote from: darkproton on May 03, 2015, 02:37:40 PM

Quote from: striker7334 2.0 on May 03, 2015, 02:05:20 PM

Quote from: darkproton on May 03, 2015, 01:58:54 PM

I could be wrong, but the possibility to exchange crave for btc may already exist in darkpoold. I will have to look into it further but it has been mentioned in counterparts threads, now, whether it is still possible or even was is a different matter but one I will look into.

From what I've heard darkpoold is difficult to use, it would have to be easy.

yes. I am working on a bottle interface and have posted a win executable to make it easy to run without having to install python or any packages

Sounds exciting I'm very interested to see it!

Delita Heiral

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

^its true
[speak of the devil......and he shall appear!]

also heres some news via oaxaca:

Quote from: oaxaca on May 03, 2015, 12:24:15 PM

Bad news for California:

California Assembly Moves Forward With Idiotic Plan To Make All Bitcoin Startups Apply For A License

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=50683

It has moved out of the California’s assembly committee on banking and finance and has been advanced to the appropriations committee.

Here are some excerpts:

Code:

(b) “Virtual currency” means any type of digital unit that is used as a medium of exchange or a form of digitally 
stored value or that is incorporated into payment system technology. Virtual currency shall be broadly construed 
to include digital units of exchange that (1) have a centralized repository or administrator, (2) are decentralized 
and have no centralized repository or administrator

of course there is this section:

Code:

26004. The following are exempt from the licensing
...
(d) A commercial bank or industrial bank, the deposits of which are insured by the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

and of course there are fees:

Code:

26006. (a) An applicant for licensure under this division shall pay to the commissioner a 
nonrefundable application fee of five thousand dollars ($5,000)
...
(e) A licensee, including a licensee described in subdivision (b), shall pay annually on or before July 1, 
a license renewal fee of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500)
...
(g) Whenever the commissioner examines a licensee, the licensee shall pay, within 10 days after
 receipt of a statement from the commissioner, a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75) per hour for 
each examiner engaged in the examination plus, if it is necessary for any examiner engaged in 
the examination to travel outside this state, the travel expenses of the examiner.

and this requirement (amongst a long list of others)

Code:

(9) A description of the source of money and credit to be used by the applicant to provide 
virtual currency services.

There is an online petition available to try and stop this thing:

https://www.change.org/p/matthew-dababneh-california-state-house-california-state-senate-save-buttonwood-sf-withdraw-ab-1326

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

Quote from: striker7334 2.0 on May 03, 2015, 02:05:20 PM

Quote from: darkproton on May 03, 2015, 01:58:54 PM

I could be wrong, but the possibility to exchange crave for btc may already exist in darkpoold. I will have to look into it further but it has been mentioned in counterparts threads, now, whether it is still possible or even was is a different matter but one I will look into.

From what I've heard darkpoold is difficult to use, it would have to be easy.

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:54:22 PM

Quote from: trader19 on May 03, 2015, 01:52:04 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:45:41 PM

Quote from: trader19 on May 03, 2015, 01:42:49 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

thanks for brief answer, imo it would be waste of time building atomic cross-chain transactions architecture at this point of time. maybe Long term yes. After Urge markets are dropped i am sure ppl will build their business around it. ALT price volatility didn't stop people using drk before, ppl do adopt you know.

Very, very few people use DRK for these types of markets, for the exact reasons I outlined. I don't use these types of markets myself but I do follow them closely as I find them interesting.

i personally didn't follow darkmarkets that closely i only saw they have drk as payment option. anyway icm has his own concept with Urge markets so it will be interesting to see how it will work out. to have btc as another payment option would sure be beneficial. maybe some community members will came up with some fresh ideas (expl. cravedigger)

None of the major darkmarkets or vendors use drk, they use btc. I agree that crave will be different and that is why it is exciting and theres a lot of potential (I edited the post you quoted to reflect that, but was too slow).

This is true they are businessmen/women(underworld businessmen/women mind you still businessmen/women) and they are going to need some stability. If we build a Cravedigger API exactly like shapeshift.io API and implemented it into the site as trader19 said that would work right or am I missing something?

Delita Heiral already has a store that accepts crave and probably will be one of the first cravers to have its own market on blockchain

Quote from: Delita Heiral on May 01, 2015, 09:35:10 PM

I'd like to announce that Animalpharm nootropics is now accepting Crave.
[animalpharm.us]

If youre in the market for noots, pm me to transact manually.
(All crave purchases will be valued at current market price, and all orders made using Crave will get 10% off.)

We ship everywhere.

Additionally, future market owners pm me. Was looking into magento or shopify but this is clearly a better solution.

As you were <3

Pretty cool !

http://www.animalpharm.us/

darkproton

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: striker7334 2.0 on May 03, 2015, 02:05:20 PM

Quote from: darkproton on May 03, 2015, 01:58:54 PM

I could be wrong, but the possibility to exchange crave for btc may already exist in darkpoold. I will have to look into it further but it has been mentioned in counterparts threads, now, whether it is still possible or even was is a different matter but one I will look into.

From what I've heard darkpoold is difficult to use, it would have to be easy.

yes. I am working on a bottle interface and have posted a win executable to make it easy to run without having to install python or any packages

waffles99

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 250

has anyone even tried to route crave traffic through i2p yet. less hype and more actual use please

STEALTHMODE

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

Don't challenge ICM Cheesy

Kimowa

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: proletariat on May 03, 2015, 02:11:14 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

yeah stop asking him for more we need this to got to 0.05 btc each

proletariat

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1005

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

Do not give ICM ideas!

Last time this was done, this happened:

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 08:25:33 PM

Quote from: fonzerrellie on April 24, 2015, 08:14:47 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on April 24, 2015, 07:56:27 PM

Almost done with the native I2P integration Cheesy

I updated the code for the latest secp256k1 and will get that checked in soon as well. Kiss

right on, sounds interesting... is that for the market integration? lol I'm not a techie so it sounds like latin to me Wink

It was something I decided to just do since people were fudding about it. So, now its baked in. The multi-sig escrow workflow is the key for the market Wink

And now we have native I2P wich wasn't on the roadmap Grin

striker7334 2.0

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 300

Unprofessional shitcoin trader since 2011

Quote from: darkproton on May 03, 2015, 01:58:54 PM

I could be wrong, but the possibility to exchange crave for btc may already exist in darkpoold. I will have to look into it further but it has been mentioned in counterparts threads, now, whether it is still possible or even was is a different matter but one I will look into.

From what I've heard darkpoold is difficult to use, it would have to be easy.

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:54:22 PM

Quote from: trader19 on May 03, 2015, 01:52:04 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:45:41 PM

Quote from: trader19 on May 03, 2015, 01:42:49 PM

Quote from: industrialcoinmagic on May 03, 2015, 01:32:39 PM

Quote from: stormia on May 03, 2015, 01:19:38 PM

I really think if these markets are to be functional they need to use btc, at least at first.

I understand your points, but in order to accept other currencies/blockchains we would need atomic cross-chain transactions. I know there are a few people looking into that but as far as I know there are no POC's out yet let alone a proven solution. For instance, how would we enforce a BTC 3 party multi-sig from within Crave. Actually, I do know one way that we could do it, but it would require that users run a full BTC node in addition to the Crave wallet and it is relatively complex to build. The fact that it is challenging doesn't mean a flat "no", but maybe it is something to put on the roadmap to look into after the market release with the understanding that it could be weeks or months of R&D work to build and test the solution.

thanks for brief answer, imo it would be waste of time building atomic cross-chain transactions architecture at this point of time. maybe Long term yes. After Urge markets are dropped i am sure ppl will build their business around it. ALT price volatility didn't stop people using drk before, ppl do adopt you know.

Very, very few people use DRK for these types of markets, for the exact reasons I outlined. I don't use these types of markets myself but I do follow them closely as I find them interesting.

i personally didn't follow darkmarkets that closely i only saw they have drk as payment option. anyway icm has his own concept with Urge markets so it will be interesting to see how it will work out. to have btc as another payment option would sure be beneficial. maybe some community members will came up with some fresh ideas (expl. cravedigger)

None of the major darkmarkets or vendors use drk, they use btc. I agree that crave will be different and that is why it is exciting and theres a lot of potential (I edited the post you quoted to reflect that, but was too slow).

This is true they are businessmen/women(underworld businessmen/women mind you still businessmen/women) and they are going to need some stability. If we build a Cravedigger API exactly like shapeshift.io API and implemented it into the site as trader19 said that would work right or am I missing something?

bitcoinsid

full member

Activity: 130

Merit: 100

I always see digital tech significantly evolve every 5-8 years, heres a few i can think of..
pc hardware shows this first then the console hardware - 8bit era - 16bit - 32bit etc every time took the best bits and moved on. For screen res we had sd then hd now uhd. Mobile phones to smart phones, 2g then 3g and now 4g roughly every 5 yr, home based internet speeds show same pattern. Then we have software doing the same , napster/kazaa to torrents and most operating systems.
Now when i look at btc its looking old, 6years is a very long time in an industry that pushes digital hardware and software to new limits.
There has been alot of innovation in the past few years in crypto but most has been experimental, someone needs to take all the knowledge we have gained in the past 5-6 years and create something that is far superior than every coin on a technical level. Aswell as adding its own unique features this new coin should learn from old mistakes such as...premines,instamines and ico.
I believe crave is doing everything i would except in a next gen crypto currency but to be doing it at such a fast pace is fascinating.
The dev is what you pay for and soon i think someone will buy up so much coin and place a big buy wall that some will dump into but this wall isnt buying crave for btc or fiat, its buying crave because it believes in the dev and what crave wants to achieve. Then with media attention crave will be easily in the top 5 cryptos.
Another thing that stands out for me is the wallet...wow, it has built in staking, tor, i2p, adrenaline nodes and stealth address in around 5 weeks !

*btc has moved beyond innovation and soon will move beyond being a commodity to becoming an actual currency, crave will oneday do the same.

Topic: [ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | I2P | Market =Embrace The Dark= - page 103. (Read 826733 times)