Pages:
Author

Topic: 🚀[ANN] Cryptohr.net 🚀 - decentralized cryptocurrency HR database - page 60. (Read 45493 times)

full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 109
Of course there will be a lot of tests before the product goes into full use. The most important thing is to attract a lot of customers, and in the raw project no one wants to enter.
I would like to see the finished platform and test it. I wonder what the interface will look like? Not sure which developer is developing the interface?
I do not have information about the development of the project. Of course I wanted to see at least screenshots of the future project.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 12
but do not rush to test the young product and run it, it is better not to, it is better to postpone the launch of the product for another month,but to pass a full test
I think the CRYPTO-HR project team understands this and will never put a raw product on the market. Since it will hurt the reputation of the project.
I also hope that the development team is experienced,and will not allow themselves to make such a huge mistake
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 117
I think that in part it should be like some kind of social network. For example, on LinkedIn only on the blockchain.
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 12
Of course there will be a lot of tests before the product goes into full use. The most important thing is to attract a lot of customers, and in the raw project no one wants to enter.
I would like to see the finished platform and test it. I wonder what the interface will look like? Not sure which developer is developing the interface?
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 109
but do not rush to test the young product and run it, it is better not to, it is better to postpone the launch of the product for another month,but to pass a full test
I think the CRYPTO-HR project team understands this and will never put a raw product on the market. Since it will hurt the reputation of the project.
Of course there will be a lot of tests before the product goes into full use. The most important thing is to attract a lot of customers, and in the raw project no one wants to enter.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 117
but do not rush to test the young product and run it, it is better not to, it is better to postpone the launch of the product for another month,but to pass a full test
I think the CRYPTO-HR project team understands this and will never put a raw product on the market. Since it will hurt the reputation of the project.
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 109
So what about listing at exchanges? Still don't find any information about it.
We negotiate with different exchanges.
Let us know which exchanges you are negotiating with. You have no opportunity to buy tokens. We want to know where to buy them.
copper member
Activity: 224
Merit: 0
So what about listing at exchanges? Still don't find any information about it.
We negotiate with different exchanges.
copper member
Activity: 224
Merit: 0
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
It means from November till January.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 12
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
We will look forward to it. But I think no need to rush to run an open beta to the public version. It is better to run it in closed mode for testing.
of course, it is better to do closed testing first,so that application errors do not scare away future users at once, and then do public testing
Yes you are right, testing is very important, and it is worthwhile to limit special attention.
For sure it should be tested before launch, but beta version means testing.
Testing the beta version will determine the final result of the full version of the project. Sometimes not significant errors do not pay attention, but they can become very important in the functional plan of the project.
I hope that everything goes well. Developers will make every effort and we get a good full product.
but do not rush to test the young product and run it, it is better not to, it is better to postpone the launch of the product for another month,but to pass a full test
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 117
The project team was responsible for listing on the crypto exchange that they are very closely involved in this issue. and maybe soon the coin (token) will be traded somewhere.
sr. member
Activity: 627
Merit: 250
The Pope Of Dope
So what about listing at exchanges? Still don't find any information about it.
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 12
I think that the rush to launch a release or a test version is not needed. If there are any problems then it will be more reflected in the CRYPTO-HR project than if they would postpone the launch of the platform for a month or two months.
sr. member
Activity: 796
Merit: 251
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
We will look forward to it. But I think no need to rush to run an open beta to the public version. It is better to run it in closed mode for testing.
That's why I'm asking for it, I agree that no need to rush with it, imho november too early.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 117
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
It seems that the developers are really going to launch the CRYPTO-HR platform in November. I hope that we will get a fully functional product and will be able to evaluate its functionality.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Hello. Are you planning to release a white paper in Russian? I can translate that, but I would like to see everything in Russian. Thank.
Where'd you find it? Can you give me link please?
We have White Paper at the site and topic

I have read this document and I want to note that this document has a lot of interesting and important information in the field of development. so I advise all those who are going to invest their money in this project, review this document and identify its important details.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 272
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
We will look forward to it. But I think no need to rush to run an open beta to the public version. It is better to run it in closed mode for testing.
of course, it is better to do closed testing first,so that application errors do not scare away future users at once, and then do public testing
Yes you are right, testing is very important, and it is worthwhile to limit special attention.
For sure it should be tested before launch, but beta version means testing.
Testing the beta version will determine the final result of the full version of the project. Sometimes not significant errors do not pay attention, but they can become very important in the functional plan of the project.
I hope that everything goes well. Developers will make every effort and we get a good full product.
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 109
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
We will look forward to it. But I think no need to rush to run an open beta to the public version. It is better to run it in closed mode for testing.
of course, it is better to do closed testing first,so that application errors do not scare away future users at once, and then do public testing
Yes you are right, testing is very important, and it is worthwhile to limit special attention.
For sure it should be tested before launch, but beta version means testing.
Testing the beta version will determine the final result of the full version of the project. Sometimes not significant errors do not pay attention, but they can become very important in the functional plan of the project.
sr. member
Activity: 627
Merit: 250
The Pope Of Dope
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
We will look forward to it. But I think no need to rush to run an open beta to the public version. It is better to run it in closed mode for testing.
of course, it is better to do closed testing first,so that application errors do not scare away future users at once, and then do public testing
Yes you are right, testing is very important, and it is worthwhile to limit special attention.
For sure it should be tested before launch, but beta version means testing.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 272
I read your whitepaper, do you really plan release beta version in November? It's really soon.
We will look forward to it. But I think no need to rush to run an open beta to the public version. It is better to run it in closed mode for testing.
of course, it is better to do closed testing first,so that application errors do not scare away future users at once, and then do public testing
Yes you are right, testing is very important, and it is worthwhile to limit special attention.
Pages:
Jump to: