[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 263.

numanoid

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1148

Quote from: guitarplinker on July 07, 2014, 06:43:27 PM

Quick question guys, are any of you having issues where when you're mining Freshcoin, the pool displays an insanely low hashrate, while CCMiner displays a normal hashrate?

I've tried a couple of pools, and they report that my 4x 750 Ti's are achieving about 32KH/s, while in CCMiner it says that it's doing about 11.8MH/s. I have about 98% share efficiency so that shouldn't be an issue, and here's what my config looks like:

ccminer.exe -a fresh -o POOL:PORT -u WORKER-NAME -p PASSWORD
pause

Do I need to add "-f 256" for a normal hashrate to show up, or is something else buggy?

EDIT: Yes the "-f 256" flag is needed. I'm so stupid, I've been working on this for a couple hours now wondering what was wrong.

Is this needed for solo mining as well? Not that Solo seems to be an option anymore, but I was thinking of trying it either overnight or maybe after the block rewards drop. I'm only seeing about 20 coins per hour with 16ish Mh/s.

guitarplinker

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1024

Quick question guys, are any of you having issues where when you're mining Freshcoin, the pool displays an insanely low hashrate, while CCMiner displays a normal hashrate?

I've tried a couple of pools, and they report that my 4x 750 Ti's are achieving about 32KH/s, while in CCMiner it says that it's doing about 11.8MH/s. I have about 98% share efficiency so that shouldn't be an issue, and here's what my config looks like:

ccminer.exe -a fresh -o POOL:PORT -u WORKER-NAME -p PASSWORD
pause

Do I need to add "-f 256" for a normal hashrate to show up, or is something else buggy?

EDIT: Yes the "-f 256" flag is needed. I'm so stupid, I've been working on this for a couple hours now wondering what was wrong.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Newwsr on July 07, 2014, 06:23:25 PM

Which gtx 750ti buy, EGVA, MSI, GIGA, which one to buy?

I have a "cheap" gainward (5~10 euros difference...) which does well too

Newwsr

sr. member

Activity: 311

Merit: 250

Which gtx 750ti buy, EGVA, MSI, GIGA, which one to buy?

guitarplinker

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1024

Quote from: jk_14 on July 07, 2014, 04:11:25 PM

Quote from: guitarplinker on July 07, 2014, 11:51:47 AM

So, I figured I'd try out KopiemTu. Booted it all up fine, got to the desktop and I find that the keyboard and mouse don't work. I've tried two generic pairs of keyboards and mice in different USB ports and nothing seems to work. Any ideas of what's causing this?

strange, first such case...
could you press TAB at first booting screen, and type: rescue
then check, if under SystemRescueCD your keyboard and mouse is working fine
(use from command line: startx to start X and check your mouse too)

I'll test that in a couple of hours. Currently the machine is being rented for a few hours and I wouldn't want to shut the rental down early. But I'll definitely try your suggestion and get back to you later today.

ilovecudacompute

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Thanks again djm34 and as always the master for his work (the two christians) Roll Eyes

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: ilovecudacompute on July 07, 2014, 03:42:01 PM

I started my .bat before i left the house and came back with zero coins because i needed the -f command in suprnova

I am so unlucky......Getting 3.6MH with 760

now that i use the -f command

I don't know why they set this so high, I have the same problem with my R9 290x...
(I will passed as default this difficulty setting, in my next update...)

jk_14

legendary

Activity: 1292

Merit: 1000

Quote from: guitarplinker on July 07, 2014, 11:51:47 AM

So, I figured I'd try out KopiemTu. Booted it all up fine, got to the desktop and I find that the keyboard and mouse don't work. I've tried two generic pairs of keyboards and mice in different USB ports and nothing seems to work. Any ideas of what's causing this?

strange, first such case...
could you press TAB at first booting screen, and type: rescue
then check, if under SystemRescueCD your keyboard and mouse is working fine
(use from command line: startx to start X and check your mouse too)

jk_14

legendary

Activity: 1292

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Matteo86x on July 07, 2014, 11:05:43 AM

Is it complex to configure in KopiemTu in opposition to windows ? Is it complex to update the new releases of CCminer?

I try to prepare patch for new releases - five simple commands, two minutes time
here you can see how it works:
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=16800.msg187745#msg187745

ilovecudacompute

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

I started my .bat before i left the house and came back with zero coins because i needed the -f command in suprnova

I am so unlucky......Getting 3.6MH with 760

now that i use the -f command

PVmining

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 252

Quote from: cbuchner1 on July 07, 2014, 03:03:31 PM

This looks like a reasonable starting point to do either a fork of said code, or to pull in all the stratum code into ccminer.

I'll proabably start by creating a cudaminer/ccminer-like Windows port based on Visual C++ 2010, as Windows is my primary
development environment for mining software.

Christian

...means... no linux in first step?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Samuray on July 07, 2014, 03:25:44 PM

Quote from: djm34 on July 07, 2014, 02:10:58 PM

Quote from: Equitum on July 07, 2014, 01:59:16 PM

Try using -f 256 on suprnova. ~~-f 32 on hashharder seems to also smooth out the shares a bit.~~

Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).

-f 256 works a lot better yes... (apparently testing on the wallet wasn't enough...)...

Any chance for improvment on hash speed for 750Ti? Roll Eyes

what speed do you get ? I get 3.4MHash/s which is a little less than half the one of the 780ti

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

one with 1000

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on July 07, 2014, 03:19:59 PM

Quote from: numanoid on July 07, 2014, 03:08:07 PM

Quote from: bigjme on July 07, 2014, 02:17:15 PM

Im solomining it atm haha

Any luck? How much MHash you throwing at it? Just started but the diff seems high.

17MH/s
1 block found

one with 1000 or one with 0 ? not bad, didn't get anyting at all with about the same hashrate

Samuray

sr. member

Activity: 291

Merit: 250

Quote from: djm34 on July 07, 2014, 02:10:58 PM

Quote from: Equitum on July 07, 2014, 01:59:16 PM

Try using -f 256 on suprnova. ~~-f 32 on hashharder seems to also smooth out the shares a bit.~~

Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).

-f 256 works a lot better yes... (apparently testing on the wallet wasn't enough...)...

Any chance for improvment on hash speed for 750Ti? Roll Eyes

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: numanoid on July 07, 2014, 03:08:07 PM

Quote from: bigjme on July 07, 2014, 02:17:15 PM

Im solomining it atm haha

Any luck? How much MHash you throwing at it? Just started but the diff seems high.

17MH/s
1 block found

numanoid

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1148

Quote from: bigjme on July 07, 2014, 02:17:15 PM

Im solomining it atm haha

Any luck? How much MHash you throwing at it? Just started but the diff seems high.

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: btc-mike on July 07, 2014, 02:55:22 PM

Christian,
Boolberry stratum code is tested and complete. Both are here -> https://github.com/cryptozoidberg
Our test pool has found a few blocks -> http://162.243.210.156/#
ExtremePool has the stratum code running on http://boolberry.extremepool.org/

This looks like a reasonable starting point to do either a fork of said code, or to pull in all the stratum code into ccminer.

I'll proabably start by creating a cudaminer/ccminer-like Windows port based on Visual C++ 2010, as Windows is my primary
development environment for mining software.

Christian

guitarplinker

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1024

Quote from: djm34 on July 07, 2014, 02:48:32 PM

Quote from: guitarplinker on July 07, 2014, 02:46:48 PM

Quote from: djm34 on July 07, 2014, 02:21:22 PM

Quote from: bigjme on July 07, 2014, 02:17:15 PM

Im solomining it atm haha

does it work ? Haven't had any chance with it...

My wallet won't sync up. Undecided

it isn't my fault either Grin

try to add those node:
addnode=144.76.142.47
addnode=144.76.142.49

Thanks, I added the nodes. Hopefully that'll help it sync up a little quicker.

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: cbuchner1 on June 15, 2014, 03:37:51 AM

But rejoice, there will be an open sourced Wild Keccak nVidia GPU miner published by us,
as soon as the Boolberry developer(s) provide

a) some stratum capable pool code for Wild Keccak
b) a cpu miner based on cpuminer-multi with some working stratum support

Due to the need for transferring and updating the Wild Keccak scratchpad this
won't be trivial, but it's also not impossible.

once a) and b) are available, it won't take long for us to either integrate this into
ccminer or publish a fork of cpuminer-multi with some nVidia support.

Christian

Christian,

Boolberry stratum code is tested and complete. Both are here -> https://github.com/cryptozoidberg

Our test pool has found a few blocks -> http://162.243.210.156/#

ExtremePool has the stratum code running on http://boolberry.extremepool.org/

Mike

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 263. (Read 3426978 times)