Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 264. (Read 3426936 times)
July 07, 2014, 02:54:08 PM
For everyone still having strange troubles with ccminer fresh: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7723374
July 07, 2014, 02:48:32 PM
Im solomining it atm haha
does it work ? Haven't had any chance with it... 
try to add those node:
addnode=144.76.142.47
addnode=144.76.142.49
July 07, 2014, 02:46:48 PM
Im solomining it atm haha
does it work ? Haven't had any chance with it... 
July 07, 2014, 02:36:00 PM
it work now without using anything, i just switched pool
poolmn is running fine
I think hashharder and supernova have difficulty set too high... poolmn is running fine
by the way the compilation seems also to work, you might have tried in debug mode...
yeah it work, it was just the pool fault, abotu that difficulty thing
July 07, 2014, 02:21:22 PM
Im solomining it atm haha
does it work ? Haven't had any chance with it... July 07, 2014, 02:17:15 PM
Im solomining it atm haha
July 07, 2014, 02:15:22 PM
it work now without using anything, i just switched pool
poolmn is running fine
I think hashharder and supernova have difficulty set too high... poolmn is running fine
by the way the compilation seems also to work, you might have tried in debug mode...
July 07, 2014, 02:13:25 PM
it work now without using anything, i just switched pool
poolmn is running fine
poolmn is running fine
July 07, 2014, 02:10:58 PM
Try using -f 256 on suprnova. -f 32 on hashharder seems to also smooth out the shares a bit.
Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).
-f 256 works a lot better yes... (apparently testing on the wallet wasn't enough...)... Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).
July 07, 2014, 01:59:16 PM
Try using -f 256 on suprnova. -f 32 on hashharder seems to also smooth out the shares a bit.
Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).
Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).
July 07, 2014, 01:49:34 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
don't work for me no yay no booo
They even lowered the diff a bit now, it looks even better ATM
i compiled it from here https://github.com/savale/ccminer, it should work right?
July 07, 2014, 01:47:02 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
don't work for me no yay no booo
They even lowered the diff a bit now, it looks even better ATM
July 07, 2014, 01:46:52 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
don't work for me no yay no booo
I am on Hashharder. It's working fine although got occasional stratum_recv_line failed
July 07, 2014, 01:45:22 PM
Finally getting accepted shares on hashharder after they adjusted their difficulty expectations.
https://i.imgur.com/ObOzsxd.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ObOzsxd.jpg
July 07, 2014, 01:39:08 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
don't work for me no yay no booo
July 07, 2014, 01:38:51 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
Solo-mining seems to be working fine in terms of the rate of shares being submitted, unlike with the pools.
The problem I'm having is that the fresh-ccminer only submits what seems to be one share a minute, or a share as soon as a new block is detected, and most of those shares (if not all) aren't accepted.
That could explain why it only show 80 kh on pool.
July 07, 2014, 01:37:38 PM
can you guys give me an example .bat for fresh on a pool? thanks
July 07, 2014, 01:36:45 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
Solo-mining seems to be working fine in terms of the rate of shares being submitted, unlike with the pools.
The problem I'm having is that the fresh-ccminer only submits what seems to be one share a minute, or a share as soon as a new block is detected, and most of those shares (if not all) aren't accepted.
July 07, 2014, 01:29:47 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
pool not working properlyPool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
it shown mine as 1.4 Gh for 4 750ti
July 07, 2014, 01:26:08 PM
not sure whether ccminer for fresh version not working properly or pool not working.
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
Pool showing less than 1 mh. Something like 80 kh per 750ti
Jump to: