i need some help with this folding.
i got the account set up and it said
1,534 go to Team Curecoin's total of 74,137,172,960
it has been 3 days and i do not see credits in my account at cryptobullionpools i was told the team # is Team 224497 and i set up a user name at cryptobullionpools. i have the folding@home client set up with the same info but i do not see any credits or ppd at cryptobullionpools. how do i fix this? or should i jsut wait more time. it has been 3 days now.
Topic: [ANN] CureCoin 2.0 is live - Mandatory Update is available now - DEC 2018 - page 40. (Read 696267 times)
February 13, 2017, 03:11:22 PM
February 13, 2017, 04:23:48 AM
Thank you for your attention.
I understand that it is difficult to alter unomp under curecoin.
Tell me please, are there any other platforms that no improvements will be compatible with curecoin?
For Example CoiniumServ?
I understand that it is difficult to alter unomp under curecoin.
Tell me please, are there any other platforms that no improvements will be compatible with curecoin?
For Example CoiniumServ?
February 12, 2017, 06:14:37 PM
Off the top of my head, the getblocktemplate has to be [] (without args) and there's some other settings that need changed/set. As I said, it's not a "simple" fix.
February 12, 2017, 02:10:57 PM
Maybe you didnt download %100 of blocks
No. Blockchain was full downloaded.Quote
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 21ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 24ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 23ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 33ms
ResendWalletTransactions()
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 27ms
received block 81d4bf4d073a4805212b
SetBestChain: new best=81d4bf4d073a4805212b height=157327 trust=1250672134659373 date=02/12/17 19:02:25,block hash= 81d4bf4d073a4805212b8c68bd7ca2a9e06880ba0445b4e21a3eeaeb13cdb9ed
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 29ms
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 8f42a16ef0 (poolsz 1)
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 30ms
received block 7914baea094338fdce3d
SetBestChain: new best=7914baea094338fdce3d height=157328 trust=1250695136214898 date=02/12/17 19:04:21,block hash= 7914baea094338fdce3dfecebd5ebbbf5fedc3063dea5bc76dfce6ada335ee07
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 482e251ab0 (poolsz 1)
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 29ms
received block 32626301d8ff4c24d314
SetBestChain: new best=32626301d8ff4c24d314 height=157329 trust=1250719724542538 date=02/12/17 19:06:42,block hash= 32626301d8ff4c24d31454dd8c95bbb30ceaee95c96736b58651f428ce569b7d
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
received block 83a6335ca9cfc2db8747
SetBestChain: new best=83a6335ca9cfc2db8747 height=157330 trust=1250745915779861 date=02/12/17 19:06:52,block hash= 83a6335ca9cfc2db87479df6632e03f0487af33a765b17a64aade83feec59ddd
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
getblocks 157330 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 9a6c2fdad4 (poolsz 1)
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 27ms
received block 692531ff622ca93518cd
SetBestChain: new best=692531ff622ca93518cd height=157331 trust=1250774343322137 date=02/12/17 19:08:44,block hash= 692531ff622ca93518cd376143669f2d54a026232791a14112161419ca0069fe
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 24ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 23ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 33ms
ResendWalletTransactions()
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 27ms
received block 81d4bf4d073a4805212b
SetBestChain: new best=81d4bf4d073a4805212b height=157327 trust=1250672134659373 date=02/12/17 19:02:25,block hash= 81d4bf4d073a4805212b8c68bd7ca2a9e06880ba0445b4e21a3eeaeb13cdb9ed
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 29ms
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 8f42a16ef0 (poolsz 1)
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 30ms
received block 7914baea094338fdce3d
SetBestChain: new best=7914baea094338fdce3d height=157328 trust=1250695136214898 date=02/12/17 19:04:21,block hash= 7914baea094338fdce3dfecebd5ebbbf5fedc3063dea5bc76dfce6ada335ee07
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 482e251ab0 (poolsz 1)
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 29ms
received block 32626301d8ff4c24d314
SetBestChain: new best=32626301d8ff4c24d314 height=157329 trust=1250719724542538 date=02/12/17 19:06:42,block hash= 32626301d8ff4c24d31454dd8c95bbb30ceaee95c96736b58651f428ce569b7d
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
received block 83a6335ca9cfc2db8747
SetBestChain: new best=83a6335ca9cfc2db8747 height=157330 trust=1250745915779861 date=02/12/17 19:06:52,block hash= 83a6335ca9cfc2db87479df6632e03f0487af33a765b17a64aade83feec59ddd
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
getblocks 157330 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 9a6c2fdad4 (poolsz 1)
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat 27ms
received block 692531ff622ca93518cd
SetBestChain: new best=692531ff622ca93518cd height=157331 trust=1250774343322137 date=02/12/17 19:08:44,block hash= 692531ff622ca93518cd376143669f2d54a026232791a14112161419ca0069fe
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
February 12, 2017, 01:46:38 PM
Maybe you didnt download %100 of blocks
February 12, 2017, 01:36:32 PM
Quote
[36m[2017-02-12 14:45:31.988] [DEBUG] [default] - [39mPool curecoin Thread 2 rpc error with daemon instance 0 when submitting block with submitblock {"code":-22,"message":"Block decode failed"}
The short answer is that your stratum is not set up properly to work for either CureCoin or PeerCoin.The long answer (which is not within the scope of this type of forum) is that you'd have to understand the code behind stratum to fix it (as it involves coding edits where stratum submits the block info).
How i can get more information for debugging?
Thank you.
This is i'm found in the merged-pooler/lib/pool.js
Am i right? Whats wrong here?
Code:
/*
Coin daemons either use submitblock or getblocktemplate for submitting new blocks
*/
function SubmitBlock(blockHex, finishedCallback){
var rpcCommand, rpcArgs;
if (options.hasSubmitMethod){
rpcCommand = 'submitblock';
rpcArgs = [blockHex];
}
else{
rpcCommand = 'getblocktemplate';
rpcArgs = [{'mode': 'submit', 'data': blockHex}];
}
_this.daemon.cmd(rpcCommand,
rpcArgs,
function(results){
for (var i = 0; i < results.length; i++){
var result = results[i];
if (result.error) {
emitErrorLog('rpc error with daemon instance ' +
result.instance.index + ' when submitting block with ' + rpcCommand + ' ' +
JSON.stringify(result.error)
);
return;
}
else if (result.response === 'rejected') {
emitErrorLog('Daemon instance ' + result.instance.index + ' rejected a supposedly valid block');
return;
}
}
emitLog('Submitted Block using ' + rpcCommand + ' successfully to daemon instance(s)');
finishedCallback();
}
);
}
February 12, 2017, 11:18:53 AM
Here you are. It`s logs from unomp and curecoin daemon.
...
Thank you for attention.
...
Thank you for attention.
Quote
[36m[2017-02-12 14:45:31.988] [DEBUG] [default] - [39mPool curecoin Thread 2 rpc error with daemon instance 0 when submitting block with submitblock {"code":-22,"message":"Block decode failed"}
The short answer is that your stratum is not set up properly to work for either CureCoin or PeerCoin.The long answer (which is not within the scope of this type of forum) is that you'd have to understand the code behind stratum to fix it (as it involves coding edits where stratum submits the block info).
February 12, 2017, 10:53:52 AM
Edit: as for tracking down your issue of you not seeing information about CureCoin blocks, a 1 minute long multi-mining stratum log, from some random point in time, isn't enough information to give you any accurate advice.
Here you are. It`s logs from unomp and curecoin daemon.https://yadi.sk/d/ve7JD9H33DwYG3
https://yadi.sk/d/KzxplFNZ3DwYGB
Thank you for attention.
February 12, 2017, 09:47:56 AM
...
Address is valid. Whats wrong?
Thats end of currently daemon log:...
Other than your miner screenshot, there's nothing in what you've shown that shows that you've found a block or if you did, when.Address is valid. Whats wrong?
Thats end of currently daemon log:...
Quote
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
means that the CureCoin client has accepted the information it was sent about a block being found on the network. You will also see this in the log for every block.Edit: as for tracking down your issue of you not seeing information about CureCoin blocks, a 1 minute long multi-mining stratum log, from some random point in time, isn't enough information to give you any accurate advice.
February 12, 2017, 08:22:53 AM
Hi guys.
Please tell me why do not mining curecoin on my mpos pool? For a few hours working miners.
Even shows that are found blocks, but pool and blockchain not displayed. Are there any thoughts on this? Is it curecoin features? 
UniversalCurrencurrency (UNIT) are mining perfectly at the same pool. Block of UNIT is every few minutes.
My pool happy.mine.nu.
Wellcome.
Hi. And again the miner has found a block, and a pool of absolute silence. How to understand this?Please tell me why do not mining curecoin on my mpos pool? For a few hours working miners.
Even shows that are found blocks, but pool and blockchain not displayed. Are there any thoughts on this? Is it curecoin features? UniversalCurrencurrency (UNIT) are mining perfectly at the same pool. Block of UNIT is every few minutes.
My pool happy.mine.nu.
Wellcome.
Address is valid. Whats wrong?
Thats end of currently daemon log:
Code:
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 26ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 19ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 27ms
ThreadRPCServer method=listaccounts
ThreadRPCServer method=help
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 18ms
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccountaddres
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccountaddress
ThreadRPCServer method=getbalance
ThreadRPCServer method=listtransactions
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 24ms
ThreadRPCServer method=listunspent
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 25ms
ThreadRPCServer method=listaccounts
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 26ms
ThreadRPCServer method=validateaddress
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 29ms
ResendWalletTransactions()
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 21ms
received block c93de993d50fe1924010
SetBestChain: new best=c93de993d50fe1924010 height=157274 trust=1249756869570318 date=02/12/17 12:48:04,block hash= c93de993d50fe19240101c0ceb51de83c07587c49d575e23475d6fdacfb14b94
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 23ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 25ms
received block 8328dab0114026a646d4
SetBestChain: new best=8328dab0114026a646d4 height=157275 trust=1249774582838834 date=02/12/17 12:51:57,block hash= 8328dab0114026a646d40b5addd884c636c5034d5082073eb1eb29f1604b5a03
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 25ms
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 26ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 30ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 29ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 27ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 25ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 17ms
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 21ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 30ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 28ms
Flushed 13069 addresses to peers.dat 24ms
Code:
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:01.732] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 4 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:02.301] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/14003.59961394 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:03.355] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 17779.63144279/26633.34940914 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvezAi8R [85.173.186.233]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:03.992] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/24750.81775761 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:05.440] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 65536/66265.17037326 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:10.927] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/1093627.71313199 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:19.339] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/8400.65877858 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:25.146] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 17779.63144279/25703.82246876 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvezAi8R [85.173.186.233]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:31.934] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/20323.38162236 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:37.374] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/10059.75107718 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:37.674] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/12255.86013613 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:37.805] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool namecoin Thread 4 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:37.815] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool namecoin Thread 1 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:37.816] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool namecoin Thread 2 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:37.871] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool namecoin Thread 3 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:38.167] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/5724.35148776 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:39.745] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/10011.50360333 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:41.965] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool emercoin Thread 1 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:41.968] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool emercoin Thread 3 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:41.973] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool emercoin Thread 4 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:42.034] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool emercoin Thread 2 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:44.505] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/34291.76253007 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:45.880] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool bitcoin Thread 2 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:45.970] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool bitcoin Thread 3 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:46.018] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool bitcoin Thread 1 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:46.108] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool bitcoin Thread 4 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:51.711] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 3 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:52.434] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 1 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:52.438] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 4 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:52.450] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 2 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:56.688] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 2 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:56.689] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:56.692] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 1 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:56.692] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Difficulty update to diff 42130.28571429 workerName="BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvezAi8R"
[36m[2017-02-12 16:02:56.733] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 4 No new blocks for 55 seconds - updating transactions & rebroadcasting work
[36m[2017-02-12 16:03:03.800] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool curecoin Thread 3 Share accepted at diff 5638.35269304/8128.05731749 by BA9b77g4jde11gyRuqFswQ6KMKnvexxxxx [85.xx.xx.xx]
[36m[2017-02-12 16:03:04.704] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 2 getting block notification via RPC polling
[36m[2017-02-12 16:03:04.705] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 1 getting block notification via RPC polling
[36m[2017-02-12 16:03:04.707] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 4 getting block notification via RPC polling
[36m[2017-02-12 16:03:04.722] [DEBUG] [default] - .[39mPool universal currency Thread 3 getting block notification via RPC polling
February 07, 2017, 12:50:29 AM
Hello everyone, just submitted the curecoin project to Product Hunt, vote up to reach the frontpage!
https://www.producthunt.com/posts/curecoin
https://www.producthunt.com/posts/curecoin
February 05, 2017, 12:52:30 PM
Hi guys.
Please tell me why do not mining curecoin on my mpos pool? For a few hours working miners. Even shows that are found blocks, but pool and blockchain not displayed. Are there any thoughts on this? Is it curecoin features?
UniversalCurrencurrency (UNIT) are mining perfectly at the same pool. Block of UNIT is every few minutes.
My pool happy.mine.nu.
Wellcome.
Please tell me why do not mining curecoin on my mpos pool? For a few hours working miners.
Even shows that are found blocks, but pool and blockchain not displayed. Are there any thoughts on this? Is it curecoin features? UniversalCurrencurrency (UNIT) are mining perfectly at the same pool. Block of UNIT is every few minutes.
My pool happy.mine.nu.
Wellcome.
February 04, 2017, 05:51:39 PM
The EVGA cards I have are the "Black" 08G-P4-5173-KR model.
Most of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070WF2OC 2-fan "Windforce" model
The rest of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070IXOC "mini-ITX" model
Please share with us their PPD results.Most of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070WF2OC 2-fan "Windforce" model
The rest of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070IXOC "mini-ITX" model
I don't keep track by individual card - and it varies with the specific work unit anyway.
My primary criteria is:
(1) reputable maker (EVGA tried to mess that up, but it was more about the TOO LOW FAN CURVE STOCK which I've never put up with)
(2) cost
(3) in the case of the mini-ITX cards, allowing for good cooling of the card next to it.
(4) "factory" clock rate.
February 02, 2017, 10:43:00 PM
That should depend only on clocks and not the model (unless there was throttling due to poor cooler design). I think he said he was getting ~600K PPD with "mild" overclocks.
February 02, 2017, 12:29:01 AM
The EVGA cards I have are the "Black" 08G-P4-5173-KR model.
Most of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070WF2OC 2-fan "Windforce" model
The rest of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070IXOC "mini-ITX" model
Please share with us their PPD results. Most of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070WF2OC 2-fan "Windforce" model
The rest of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070IXOC "mini-ITX" model
February 01, 2017, 08:13:01 PM
Thanks for your input!
February 01, 2017, 05:54:45 PM
@QuintLeo
Is there any particular 1070 model that you recommend for longevity / price / cooling, etc.? I was thinking the EVGA ACX 3.0 08G-P4-5171. I know they had an issue with missing thermal pads but they'll send a free kit to fix that and honour their warranty. Seems to be one of the cheapest and also its EVGA with dual fans, so it seems like the one to go with but I wanted to get your opinion first.
Is there any particular 1070 model that you recommend for longevity / price / cooling, etc.? I was thinking the EVGA ACX 3.0 08G-P4-5171. I know they had an issue with missing thermal pads but they'll send a free kit to fix that and honour their warranty. Seems to be one of the cheapest and also its EVGA with dual fans, so it seems like the one to go with but I wanted to get your opinion first.
The EVGA cards I have are the "Black" 08G-P4-5173-KR model.
Most of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070WF2OC 2-fan "Windforce" model
The rest of my Gigabytes are the GV-N1070IXOC "mini-ITX" model
All are 8GB (but I think all 1070s released to date are 8GB)
The Gigabyte 2-fan Windforce models I run seem to stay just as cool as the 2-fan EVGA cards I run, despite being a little higher "factory" clocked.
The Gigabyte MiniITX stay cool as well but they have less obstruction in their airflow.
Given a choice at the same price point I'd go with he Gigabytes due to the higher clocks.
It's more about gettng ANY GPU set up with a SANE fan speed / curve than any other factor when it comes to keeping 1070s cool.
I don't have a preference at all on reliability so far, haven't had issues with a 1070 failing yet.
The Gigabytes seem to have a little more headroom on overclocking, despite their higher "factory" clock, at the cost of having a higher TDP (151 watts vs 180 watts using Nvidia-SMI to monitor with Afterburner set at the "+0 TDP" point).
February 01, 2017, 05:38:58 PM
... I also don't build "optimised specifically for Folding" systems... My "base systems" probably run $250-$300 but that's with a much higher cost CPU than a "Folding-specific" system needs, could easily cut over $100 of the price by going with a bottom-end A4 or switching to an AM3+ solution with a Sempron CPU instead. Plenty of well-under $100 motherboards with 3x PCI-E 16-bit slots on the AMD side...
Then, perhaps, you shouldn't try to chime in on what is "better". You're building a system that's at a loss in bandwidth to start and you're pretending to have some valid response about production values?Yes, I agree, there are boards with 3 slots; however, that option spends $300 to "save" $200...
As you admit, folding isn't mining, and as such things are different. Do future folders a service and stop giving a technical opinion that is based on something that's non-relevant.
Nope - I don't have a loss in bandwidth, the 6 card systems are the ones trying to shove twice the bandwidth through the SAME CPU bandwidth and usually same number of PCI-E lanes.
I also didn't specify anything about "better" on the system build - I was just pointing out that the numbers on the "economics" for the 1070 vs. the 1080 were skewed and incorrect.
I also don't "spend $300 to save $200" - I could match the total system cost PER CARD pretty much exactly with non-riser systems if I chose to do so in large part because I don't spend the INFLATED PRICING on super-high-end PS, plus I don't have to pay for the risers themselves, and I would end up with systems that are AT LEAST as reliable and stable and likely MORE reliable.
Just because YOUR errors or outright lies have been exposed doesn't mean my points are invalid - just because I don't CHOOSE to build "optimised for folding" systems doesn't mean I don't know the ECONOMICS or HOW to do so.
February 01, 2017, 03:00:58 PM
@QuintLeo
Is there any particular 1070 model that you recommend for longevity / price / cooling, etc.? I was thinking the EVGA ACX 3.0 08G-P4-5171. I know they had an issue with missing thermal pads but they'll send a free kit to fix that and honour their warranty. Seems to be one of the cheapest and also its EVGA with dual fans, so it seems like the one to go with but I wanted to get your opinion first.
Is there any particular 1070 model that you recommend for longevity / price / cooling, etc.? I was thinking the EVGA ACX 3.0 08G-P4-5171. I know they had an issue with missing thermal pads but they'll send a free kit to fix that and honour their warranty. Seems to be one of the cheapest and also its EVGA with dual fans, so it seems like the one to go with but I wanted to get your opinion first.
January 31, 2017, 05:04:02 PM
... I also don't build "optimised specifically for Folding" systems... My "base systems" probably run $250-$300 but that's with a much higher cost CPU than a "Folding-specific" system needs, could easily cut over $100 of the price by going with a bottom-end A4 or switching to an AM3+ solution with a Sempron CPU instead. Plenty of well-under $100 motherboards with 3x PCI-E 16-bit slots on the AMD side...
Then, perhaps, you shouldn't try to chime in on what is "better". You're building a system that's at a loss in bandwidth to start and you're pretending to have some valid response about production values?Yes, I agree, there are boards with 3 slots; however, that option spends $300 to "save" $200...
As you admit, folding isn't mining, and as such things are different. Do future folders a service and stop giving a technical opinion that is based on something that's non-relevant.
Jump to: