Topic: [ANN] CureCoin 2.0 is live - Mandatory Update is available now - DEC 2018 - page 38. (Read 696267 times)

3 things:
1) "Downgrade" to one of the 372/373.xx drivers; 375/376.xx drivers have known folding issues (newest [376.48+] if "fixed" but still less PPD than 372/373)
2) Some users have seen more stability and PPD with the v7.4.16 F@H beta client
3) Are you folding all the time? Your pic shows estimated PPD of ~650k for full time folding and you have a log starting @ 52% complete

Z77, FAH 7.4.4, Win7x64SP1 (all updates), 376.33 NV driver. In FAH client i use only GPU and add client-type=advanced in GPU slot.
...

What motherboard, OS, F@H client version, and drivers are you using?
What are your F@H client settings? (first 70-80 lines of new/refreshed log would be helpful)

...only ~250 PPD score in my stats. What should I do to get 600k...

Frankly, I don't care if you think you have any idea what you're on about or not. I had what I had, I dumped what I dumped, I will dump what I will dump, and suckers will continue to hold onto coins that are only spendable with other suckers.
As long as the coin is centralized and has no market (other than on an exchange), it has no inherent future purpose other than to dump on some future schlub willing to give you something because they hope to sucker some other schlub into giving them more than they gave you. I've said it before and I'll say it again.... Total POS - usability = scheme where only the richest benefit.

...blablabla...

What is daily distributed has nothing to do with anything;

...

I think most of those top wallets contain the Curecoin 1.0 premine from which we get payed now for folding/mining/minting and which will be burned once we switch to Cure 2.0

If Curecoin exists for about 1000 days and about 7500 Cure are distributed every day, 7.5 million is a rough approximation of what is in circulation.

There's over 15.3 million in the top 6 wallets alone:
1   BSdpkCmw...   3,742,113.000
2   B94cxTxu...   2,322,629.000
3   B6UzKzMn...   2,322,628.000
4   BTLLZVK7...   2,322,628.000
5   BKf3prKE...   2,322,628.000
6   B4dbDb5Q...   2,322,628.000
Not sure where you imagined "only 6-8 million" from.
So, it's possible that what you're smelling is yourself....

Your forgetting the basis for Curecoin, folding protein.

In order to fold protein, you need computer hardware.

There has to be POW. Without people folding protein, there would be no Curecoin.

afaik only 6-8 million cure are in fact in circulation
to state u have a few million cure
make me revalue the content written by u

if something smells like bs and it looks like bs then most likely it is bs

afaik only 6-8 million cure are in fact in circulation
to state u have a few million cure
make me revalue the content written by u

if something smells like bs and it looks like bs then most likely it is bs

absolute nothing is wrong with POS instead investing into mining gear u invest in coins
and in opposite to mining gear the coins dont degrade in earning power and have zero (or lets say a few watt for a 24/7 minting node) electrical power cost

Full POS is bad, because it's centralized and only rewards the "rich" for being "rich". <- and that's coming from a guy that has a few million CURE

.... If you are solo mining you might**( especially if your wallet and miner are on the same LAN) get better efficiency mining straight to your wallet without stratum...

We are still planning to launch SigmaX which will share a common codebase with cc2.0 and provide pure-PoW functionality. It won't be SHA256D for ASICs, but it will still support "traditional" mining and the accompanying security model.

Thank you for your attention.
I understand that it is difficult to alter unomp under curecoin.
Tell me please, are there any other platforms that no improvements will be compatible with curecoin?
For Example CoiniumServ?

Is the protein-folding problem “solved” yet (69)? We believe it is no longer useful to frame the question this way. Protein folding is now a whole field of research—a large, growing, and diverse enterprise. A field of science—such as physics, chemistry, or biology—is bigger than any individual research question. A field is self-perpetuating; a few old puzzles generate more new puzzles. For the field of protein physical science, the future is at least as compelling as the past. Here are some of the unsolved problems: We have little experimental knowledge of protein-folding energy landscapes. We cannot consistently predict the structures of proteins to high accuracy. We do not have a quantitative microscopic understanding of the folding routes or transition states for arbitrary amino acid sequences. We cannot predict a protein’s propensity to aggregate, which is important for aging and folding diseases. We do not have algorithms that accurately give the binding affinities of drugs and small molecules to proteins. We do not understand why a cellular proteome does not precipitate, because of the high density inside a cell. We know little about how folding diseases happen, or how to intervene. Fifty years ago, the protein-folding problem was born as a grand challenge of basic science. Since then, our understanding has advanced considerably. And, outgrowths of protein folding include the commercial development of new computers, such as IBM’s Blue Gene; new modes of citizen science, including Folding@Home and Foldit; the development of communal scientific competitions, such as CASP; a database of now more than 80,000 protein structures; the Moore’sLaw advancement in biomolecular simulation forcefields; new areas of materials science based on foldable polymers; and a foundation for understanding whole new classes of diseases—such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and type II diabetes, called folding diseases—that were not even known when the protein-folding problem was first identified. In times when there are pressures on science budgets for immediate payoffs, it is worth repeating the well-worn point that untargeted basic science often pays off in unexpected ways.

Curecoin is not more profitable than ZEC.
Even worse when you have AMD gpus....

That needs to be fixed!
I have a bunch of people on local forum ready to switch from ZEC/ETH. I just need a reliable calculator to convince them.