[ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 132.

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: YGung on September 19, 2017, 12:16:58 PM

quick confirmation needed please:

I transitioned to DMDV3.0 via the original transition guide using method 2: http://bit.diamonds/DMD_2.0_to_3.0_guide.pdf

My DMD were transferred over on the 14th, and I've got what I believe to be incoming cloudmining transactions up to the 18th. My balance is correct and everything looks fine to me, only notable difference to me is that the wallet labels didn't carry over, and my address isn't shown as a receiving address.

Now seeing everyone urged to do the short transition on the OP which is a bit different then method 2 from the original guide. Do I need to wipe my current DMDV3.0 install and do a clean one now using the short transition guide, or am I good?

hi ygung

its strong suggested u follow the new migration guide
http://bit.diamonds/how_transition_short.pdf
keep using a wallet.dat from old wallet have a risc involved
i dont suggest everyone to take even if it looks like ok on a quick view

important is that u make no transactions or whatever with the old wallet.dat inside
the new DMDv3 wallet to not risc losing coins in addresses u wont have access when the worst case happens and the wallet.dat get corrupted

close the wallet rename the wallet.dat to wallet.dat.old

restart wallet

a new wallet is generated

now u can start import private keys from old DMDv2 wallet following the guide
u can have both clinets the old and the new running same time and just dump and import the keys one by one

after finished u should again have full balance but based on a native v3 wallet.dat

when finished do ur protection and backup work (encrypt wallet and backup wallet.dat )

then u should be ok

Lionel

sr. member

Activity: 613

Merit: 305

Now it is active.
I don't understand why yesterday and the whole last night it wasn't for all the time .

Now i have just restarted and unlocked the wallet with my password and i have waited some time... and magically the staking is active.

Strange..

Lionel

sr. member

Activity: 613

Merit: 305

Quote from: shveicar on September 18, 2017, 10:19:19 PM

Quote from: Lionel on September 18, 2017, 07:43:57 PM

I have 26.39 DMD and i've started the wallet with -staking=1 but the staking is still not active.

Why?

If you add this line in the file diamond.conf it should look like as

Code:

staking=1

but in the basic settings, you can and no add this line to the file dimond.conf and your wallet will still have POS minting.

When i first run the wallet i did not change the settings, and the issue was still there.
Without specifying staking=1 my staking is not active.
After specifying it both from the command line and diamond.conf, it is still not active.
These are the contents of my diamong.conf:

Code:

staking=1

And this is my debug.log file: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ao4pRXNsgcpfimXILp4JsCVCMm7V

Is there some dev that can check it out please?

Maybe i must run it as a masternode??

YGung

full member

Activity: 318

Merit: 100

quick confirmation needed please:

I transitioned to DMDV3.0 via the original transition guide using method 2: http://bit.diamonds/DMD_2.0_to_3.0_guide.pdf

My DMD were transferred over on the 14th, and I've got what I believe to be incoming cloudmining transactions up to the 18th. My balance is correct and everything looks fine to me, only notable difference to me is that the wallet labels didn't carry over, and my address isn't shown as a receiving address.

Now seeing everyone urged to do the short transition on the OP which is a bit different then method 2 from the original guide. Do I need to wipe my current DMDV3.0 install and do a clean one now using the short transition guide, or am I good?

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

better save then sorry we requested bittrex to stop execute deposite and withdraw
while we analyze this

fairglu

legendary

Activity: 1100

Merit: 1032

Quote from: Limx Dev on September 19, 2017, 07:56:32 AM

This screenshot seems to agree with my explorer on the transaction lines (near bottom), note how the input amount is 26.619, but there are three outputs with values 0, 2498 and 0.015275 respectively.

The raw transaction reports the same figures (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/tx.dws?fd6bf7e7d04899ebd0b900060bc387c933d5eb47791b869fd02666bb9eb688ce.htm, click "raw transaction" or see below)

Not sure why the generated value is reported as 0.0235 in that screenshot, or maybe there is a bug in the raw transaction API ?

Code:

{
   "txid": "fd6bf7e7d04899ebd0b900060bc387c933d5eb47791b869fd02666bb9eb688ce",
   "version": 1,
   "locktime": 0,
   "vin": [
   {
   "txid": "14a17b25a0348d66c35f78ca490291a20a154daa018f2b777cb919dd9f5de71b",
   "vout": 0,
   "scriptSig": {
   "asm": "3045022100d44734a8ed58bc0ad6b7be12fe156b4a17535a2fa27afccdc1a0251c82579f7202201db3a434c9568b312a7212a6d86d552936f0886f88d0adb66b73a67208fd40e201 03c4f0089b134e63511620e153907dc57ecaa792623b8bbf59bcf6ff91dfa94130",
   "hex": "483045022100d44734a8ed58bc0ad6b7be12fe156b4a17535a2fa27afccdc1a0251c82579f7202201db3a434c9568b312a7212a6d86d552936f0886f88d0adb66b73a67208fd40e2012103c4f0089b134e63511620e153907dc57ecaa792623b8bbf59bcf6ff91dfa94130"
   },
   "sequence": 4294967295
   }
   ],
   "vout": [
   {
   "value": 0,
   "n": 0,
   "scriptPubKey": {
   "asm": "",
   "hex": "",
   "type": "nonstandard"
   }
   },
   {
   "value": 2498,
   "n": 1,
   "scriptPubKey": {
   "asm": "03c4f0089b134e63511620e153907dc57ecaa792623b8bbf59bcf6ff91dfa94130 OP_CHECKSIG",
   "hex": "2103c4f0089b134e63511620e153907dc57ecaa792623b8bbf59bcf6ff91dfa94130ac",
   "reqSigs": 1,
   "type": "pubkey",
   "addresses": [
   "dJCtEVEqoBuEy5t5A5faZKSKiUBTwKThEb"
   ]
   }
   },
   {
   "value": 0.015275,
   "n": 2,
   "scriptPubKey": {
   "asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 91257b1e75282903ada3153fdd03d3e5ca12d461 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
   "hex": "76a91491257b1e75282903ada3153fdd03d3e5ca12d46188ac",
   "reqSigs": 1,
   "type": "pubkeyhash",
   "addresses": [
   "dSekVow8PvDgoSecrJEdAWHwwUeqqHigGt"
   ]
   }
   }
   ],
   "blockhash": "7639e9850499ebba1d50781c45b5bbe1cefed951f2b58c5247ed0e4fe0f26d2a",
   "confirmations": 275,
   "time": 1505793863,
   "blocktime": 1505793863
}

Limx Dev

copper member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1348

Quote from: cryptonit on September 19, 2017, 06:00:27 AM

Quote from: tanakan on September 19, 2017, 05:47:20 AM

Quote from: eliano on September 19, 2017, 03:14:52 AM

Quote from: temp89 on September 19, 2017, 02:22:03 AM

Date / Time	Blocks	Height	Interval	Transactions	Value Out	Difficulty	Generated+Fees
2017-09-19 Tue	183	3923	-	54	166,014.728 DMD	5569.2 ± 24%	2,475.63589707
2017-09-18 Mon	641	3740	134.8	454	1,058,772.883 DMD	6258.6 ± 53%	14.92628301

Is that possible? We are still in slow startup phase.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?dJCtEVEqoBuEy5t5A5faZKSKiUBTwKThEb.htm - lucky man; 2,471.381 DMD in one stake Shocked

.

I suspect a little glitch in the blockchain scanning engine of the site:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/tx.dws?8704.htm

Previous transaction shows 26.619 DMD 'in' and 2,498.0 + 0.015275 'out', that's over 9000% stake, YESSSSSS! Grin

Danbi, cryptonit, can you tell us what's happen?

analyzing

We can currently not explain this transaction. Kind Regards Christian

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: tanakan on September 19, 2017, 05:47:20 AM

Quote from: eliano on September 19, 2017, 03:14:52 AM

Quote from: temp89 on September 19, 2017, 02:22:03 AM

Date / Time	Blocks	Height	Interval	Transactions	Value Out	Difficulty	Generated+Fees
2017-09-19 Tue	183	3923	-	54	166,014.728 DMD	5569.2 ± 24%	2,475.63589707
2017-09-18 Mon	641	3740	134.8	454	1,058,772.883 DMD	6258.6 ± 53%	14.92628301

Is that possible? We are still in slow startup phase.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?dJCtEVEqoBuEy5t5A5faZKSKiUBTwKThEb.htm - lucky man; 2,471.381 DMD in one stake Shocked

.

I suspect a little glitch in the blockchain scanning engine of the site:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/tx.dws?8704.htm

Previous transaction shows 26.619 DMD 'in' and 2,498.0 + 0.015275 'out', that's over 9000% stake, YESSSSSS! Grin

Danbi, cryptonit, can you tell us what's happen?

analyzing

tanakan

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: eliano on September 19, 2017, 03:14:52 AM

Quote from: temp89 on September 19, 2017, 02:22:03 AM

Date / Time	Blocks	Height	Interval	Transactions	Value Out	Difficulty	Generated+Fees
2017-09-19 Tue	183	3923	-	54	166,014.728 DMD	5569.2 ± 24%	2,475.63589707
2017-09-18 Mon	641	3740	134.8	454	1,058,772.883 DMD	6258.6 ± 53%	14.92628301

Is that possible? We are still in slow startup phase.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?dJCtEVEqoBuEy5t5A5faZKSKiUBTwKThEb.htm - lucky man; 2,471.381 DMD in one stake Shocked

.

I suspect a little glitch in the blockchain scanning engine of the site:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/tx.dws?8704.htm

Previous transaction shows 26.619 DMD 'in' and 2,498.0 + 0.015275 'out', that's over 9000% stake, YESSSSSS! Grin

Danbi, cryptonit, can you tell us what's happen?

Shivoreun

member

Activity: 130

Merit: 10

Quote from: Shivoreun on September 19, 2017, 01:52:31 AM

danbi
cryptonit
OK, now it's more clear to me, thanks for your answers

I've removed the old wallet.dat, because -upgradewallet option didn't solved the problem with the error message. So, I've started fresh wallet, it have generated new wallet.dat, then imported the private key, and now see the 2 addreses - the old one, and the v3. Ballance is OK... This wallet is not encrypted, and it's not staking Sad

The debug console shows this:

Code:

getstakingstatus

{
   "validtime" : true,
   "haveconnections" : true,
   "walletunlocked" : true,
   "mintablecoins" : true,
   "enoughcoins" : true,
   "mnsync" : true
}

But the diamond icon is gray and hover tooltip says "Staking is not active". If I encrypt the wallet, and get it unlocked by typing a password, the staking is active immediatelly... What should I do, to get wallet staking, without locking it with the password?

Thanks in advance for help.

Everybody, sorry for disturb. The staking become active, after adding staking=1 into diamond.conf and restarting the wallet.

examelon

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

All the best to your project!

Masternode is very attractive!

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

looking at the actual POS diff i suggest to everyone use
setstakesplitthreshold 200
in console

and ist not structuring ur coin pile instant to this size
its affecting just that the split at POS wont happen if the result would be lower than 200 dmd
and later on in a few days it will start try smaller inputs below 200 when finding a POS block
(only inputs older than 5 days are considered to be merged)

if u want to instant split ur coins u need to use the UTXO tool at send coins
i think @shveicar wrote a guide for that already
it will be part of his tipps and tricks DMDv3 page he release soon

eliano

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Quote from: temp89 on September 19, 2017, 02:22:03 AM

Date / Time	Blocks	Height	Interval	Transactions	Value Out	Difficulty	Generated+Fees
2017-09-19 Tue	183	3923	-	54	166,014.728 DMD	5569.2 ± 24%	2,475.63589707
2017-09-18 Mon	641	3740	134.8	454	1,058,772.883 DMD	6258.6 ± 53%	14.92628301

Is that possible? We are still in slow startup phase.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?dJCtEVEqoBuEy5t5A5faZKSKiUBTwKThEb.htm - lucky man; 2,471.381 DMD in one stake Shocked

.

I suspect a little glitch in the blockchain scanning engine of the site:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/tx.dws?8704.htm

Previous transaction shows 26.619 DMD 'in' and 2,498.0 + 0.015275 'out', that's over 9000% stake, YESSSSSS! Grin

temp89

sr. member

Activity: 246

Merit: 250

Date / Time	Blocks	Height	Interval	Transactions	Value Out	Difficulty	Generated+Fees
2017-09-19 Tue	183	3923	-	54	166,014.728 DMD	5569.2 ± 24%	2,475.63589707
2017-09-18 Mon	641	3740	134.8	454	1,058,772.883 DMD	6258.6 ± 53%	14.92628301

Is that possible? We are still in slow startup phase.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/address.dws?dJCtEVEqoBuEy5t5A5faZKSKiUBTwKThEb.htm - lucky man; 2,471.381 DMD in one stake Shocked

.

Shivoreun

member

Activity: 130

Merit: 10

danbi
cryptonit
OK, now it's more clear to me, thanks for your answers

I've removed the old wallet.dat, because -upgradewallet option didn't solved the problem with the error message. So, I've started fresh wallet, it have generated new wallet.dat, then imported the private key, and now see the 2 addreses - the old one, and the v3. Ballance is OK... This wallet is not encrypted, and it's not staking Sad

The debug console shows this:

Code:

getstakingstatus

{
"validtime" : true,
"haveconnections" : true,
"walletunlocked" : true,
"mintablecoins" : true,
"enoughcoins" : true,
"mnsync" : true
}

But the diamond icon is gray and hover tooltip says "Staking is not active". If I encrypt the wallet, and get it unlocked by typing a password, the staking is active immediatelly... What should I do, to get wallet staking, without locking it with the password?

Thanks in advance for help.

temp89

sr. member

Activity: 246

Merit: 250

Quote from: NoxX on September 18, 2017, 03:23:48 AM

Quote from: temp89 on September 18, 2017, 01:38:27 AM

What about raspi? I tried to use scripts according to instructions in INSTALL file (in source code) and I got message I haven't proper version of Berkeley DB.

Someone in the slack channel mentioned that you have to use Berkeley DB 4.8 I believe. I haven't had time to test it myself, but this might help:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md#berkeley-db

Let me know if you have any success! Wink

The command from your link (for DMD code source):

Quote from: CHAOSiTEC on September 18, 2017, 04:25:09 AM

for portable wallet.dat file, you need 4.8 else you can do --with-incompatible-bdb in the ./configure line

After 3 hours (sic!) make command was ended and I even found diamond-qt file but I get error:

Quote from: BogdanCo on September 18, 2017, 02:28:48 PM

Don't waste your time with all these libs like I did Cheesy

. You will get all the libs needed and then the wallet will fail to compile because the CPU is on another architecture (armv7l or something).
Someone posted the builds (wallet compiled) for raspberry Pi on the slack channel, they are working for Raspbian and also for Rokos Core: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0NqMbA-2YNVOXlEZXYwYlMwMlk

Too late. I wasted my time yesterday Sad

but thanks for info

.

Is dbraford trusted person? Can I use files from him/her safely?

shveicar

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1013

DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/

Quote from: Lionel on September 18, 2017, 07:43:57 PM

I have 26.39 DMD and i've started the wallet with -staking=1 but the staking is still not active.

Why?

If you add this line in the file diamond.conf it should look like as

Code:

staking=1

but in the basic settings, you can and no add this line to the file dimond.conf and your wallet will still have POS minting.

amd64ever

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: Lionel on September 18, 2017, 07:43:57 PM

I have 26.39 DMD and i've started the wallet with -staking=1 but the staking is still not active.

Why?

my pos staking was not active too until i restart wallet

Lionel

sr. member

Activity: 613

Merit: 305

I have 26.39 DMD and i've started the wallet with -staking=1 but the staking is still not active.

Why?

Woody20285

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Supporting DMD, ERC & PIO

Thanks to Danbi for the MN setup

Topic: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 132. (Read 1260677 times)