Author

Topic: [ANN] ECC - page 146. (Read 259347 times)

sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 250
[insert trending meme] 人
April 22, 2015, 05:10:07 AM
3 pronged attack

trading,mining,staking

we all win

Grin
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 265
April 21, 2015, 02:45:10 PM
Ummm

There are no enemies or friends??

This is a business and to treat it as anything less
with real money or more important other peoples money
is not only irresponsabile but quite frankly dumb.

My points are all truthfull, valid and to the point.
And we are not being paid for any of this either.

The trusted crypto team are not here to make friends or hold
anybodies hand, we are here to make sure that all our
investments including  yours, get the most bang for buck and to implement
our ideas in this exciting new technology, and there
is just no room for fudders, gangs, complainers or anything
that will slow us down or create confusion.

All we ask is that everyone who shares our vision and wants
to be a part of an innovative new wallet technology,
to please get onboard and do their part.
All those others that just want something
for nothing can move along to the next scam.

Its really as simple as that.

As always keep minting, mining and trading Wink
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Enjoying the ups & downs of Cryptocurrency!
April 21, 2015, 02:00:08 PM
It is interesting to note that the loud mouths and fudders have disapeared
all of a sudden. Just goes to show you out there that most so called communities
are plauged with would be whales talking rubbish all the time trying to
incite fear and panic in order to get people to sell cheap so that they can then
make easy profits.

There is absolutley no reason whatsoever why all those that used to be so vocal
(in all the threads of whatever coin) if they were really holders of the coin and true
community members would not be here now offering their opinions like before.

Their silence is damning and should prove to everyone that these types of people
are not to be trusted and should be avoided for the good of crypto.

The only people infact that you should even think about trusting are the developers,
as they and no one else are the ones who do the work and tend to be invested
in the project and then again only after they have proved themselves.

Most coin holders and investors have little to say on a thread unless they
have legitimate concerns and questions about their investments and that is
simply the hard cold truth in the investment world, this is true if you are invested in
the bond market or have shares in gold or  silver mines or any kind of industry.
The only time investors get together are during shareholder meetings and votes.

We do encourage all those that would like to talk to each other on this thread
but we are hardly surprised that an overwhelming majority are just happy to hold
and quietly watch the progress.

As always keep minting Wink

ANNOUNCEMENT

We have noticed that only 2 or 3 people are trading
on bittrex but if others dont start to do their bit as well then
you all only have yourselves to blame for losing the exchange!

The trusted crypto team cannot afford to lose .2btc per coin
just to keep the rest of you afloat we are not being paid
for doing this project that you all will personally gain from.
There are plenty of holders of each coin as can be seen on the
rich lists.

So again we appeal to everyone involved to make a daily
5k to 10k trade to yourself so you dont lose your coins
and this will cost us all less than 5 cents a day if 10 to 20
of us from each coin do this.

It really is the very least that you can all do for your
own investments. 

I'm an investor.  Am I the enemy or friend sovie?  Either way your logic along
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1025
April 20, 2015, 08:59:33 PM
This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on April 24th unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC.

Pump it or dump it   Tongue Tongue


but we need to be in bittrex   Sad Sad
hero member
Activity: 519
Merit: 500
April 20, 2015, 11:16:24 AM
I have no BTC right now, but will probably pick some up soon and help out
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 265
April 20, 2015, 09:54:19 AM
ANNOUNCEMENT

We have noticed that only 2 or 3 people are trading
on bittrex but if others dont start to do their bit as well then
you all only have yourselves to blame for losing the exchange!

The trusted crypto team cannot afford to lose .2btc per coin
just to keep the rest of you afloat we are not being paid
for doing this project that you all will personally gain from.
There are plenty of holders of each coin as can be seen on the
rich lists.

So again we appeal to everyone involved to make a daily
5k to 10k trade to yourself so you dont lose your coins
and this will cost us all less than 5 cents a day if 10 to 20
of us from each coin do this.

It really is the very least that you can all do for your
own investments. 
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 265
April 18, 2015, 12:06:35 PM
buy and sell to yourselves so the coin losses are miniscule
If everyone does this bittrex poxy .2btc fees is easily achieved.

Ofcource if u have a genuine opp to make a good trade then by all
means do so. This is what i do most of the time sell and buy to myself but the
more of us that do this then the less coins we all lose.

No excuse for everyone to make at least one 5k trade a day to yourselves.

I've personally only lost 1k super (being the most expensive coin) in the last month
doing this, if everyone climbs in this would bring it down to under a hundred or so if not more to keep it above .2btc

keep minting and trading Wink
hero member
Activity: 894
Merit: 1000
April 18, 2015, 11:39:37 AM
Super and mwc are in danger of de-listing on Bittrex...
Any ideas on how to prevent this?

Regards

Goldmaxx
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
April 17, 2015, 11:07:20 PM
#99
pool ?

making mods on that as i type...
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
April 17, 2015, 11:03:58 PM
#98
pool ?
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
April 17, 2015, 08:24:15 PM
#97
Alright. so i believe the staking problem is solved, i ran some new tests this morning which everything in the blocks it staked worked HOWEVER the amount that is minted from those blocks was.... grossly out of proportion (x1,000,000 what it should have been as both blocks minted over 500 million). they of course were rejected by the system and immidiately set as orphan as they should have been so thats good. however this caused the forking of the chain i have so i have to redownload.... im kicking myself now for not backing it up before running new staking tests. a mistake i will not make again. i am redownloading it now and i can continue to run tests on the new wallet as soon as that is finished redownloading....

while that is going i will be working on other code for other parts of the project. so that no time is wasted.

Thanks for the information. It is informative, especially for those that don't realise the amount of time and skill that is needed for good coding.

im considering taking the nSubsidy (coin amount that is rewarded for staking) and just dividing it by 1,000,000 which is what a quick hack fix would be that doesnt solve the actual problem. but id like to see if i can fix the actual staking implementation issue itself instead of taking the shortcut. im comparing every field of the blocks in the chain and finding any differences that might lead me to an answer.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
April 17, 2015, 07:32:33 PM
#96
Alright. so i believe the staking problem is solved, i ran some new tests this morning which everything in the blocks it staked worked HOWEVER the amount that is minted from those blocks was.... grossly out of proportion (x1,000,000 what it should have been as both blocks minted over 500 million). they of course were rejected by the system and immidiately set as orphan as they should have been so thats good. however this caused the forking of the chain i have so i have to redownload.... im kicking myself now for not backing it up before running new staking tests. a mistake i will not make again. i am redownloading it now and i can continue to run tests on the new wallet as soon as that is finished redownloading....

while that is going i will be working on other code for other parts of the project. so that no time is wasted.

Thanks for the information. It is informative, especially for those that don't realise the amount of time and skill that is needed for good coding.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
April 17, 2015, 03:51:26 PM
#95
Alright. so i believe the staking problem is solved, i ran some new tests this morning which everything in the blocks it staked worked HOWEVER the amount that is minted from those blocks was.... grossly out of proportion (x1,000,000 what it should have been as both blocks minted over 500 million). they of course were rejected by the system and immidiately set as orphan as they should have been so thats good. however this caused the forking of the chain i have so i have to redownload.... im kicking myself now for not backing it up before running new staking tests. a mistake i will not make again. i am redownloading it now and i can continue to run tests on the new wallet as soon as that is finished redownloading....

while that is going i will be working on other code for other parts of the project. so that no time is wasted.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
April 17, 2015, 02:01:32 PM
#94
sorry guys i havent posted in a while. i will be posting an update in a few hours
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
April 17, 2015, 04:52:56 AM
#93
Hey I was curious about your thoughts on having your own forums?
legendary
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
April 15, 2015, 06:07:14 AM
#92
I was able to download the 2.4 wallet before you guys took it offline.
I also downloaded the whole blockchain before I read something was wrong with the staking.
Can I use this blockchain for the fixed 2.4 version?

Regards

Goldmaxx



oh ok. yeah. that will be gone with 2.4.1. the thing thats taking me so long. is im sitting here. bit shifting large ints and converting the binary back to hex to figure out what is wrong with the kernel that at block 77050 it takes the negative version of the what should be checksum modifier

Well done with Trusted Cryptos concept, very encouraging!! Any eta on the new ECCoin wallet?


My old ECC v.2.3 wallet works fine and stakes fast.

can you point me to a download link, the ones on the website have been disabled
thanks

I have to ask Griffith to upload the 2.3 windows wallet again. I only have the MAC wallet available on  the server on this moment. But I think that the 2.4 wallet will be online this weekend. It will need a full redownload of the blockchain. The 2.4 wallet can only work with it's own blockchain, your old blockchain (2.3) can stay in your data folder, you can use it with the 2.3 wallet...simultaneous use is not possible because they use the same port.

Yes, you can...
hero member
Activity: 894
Merit: 1000
April 15, 2015, 05:38:18 AM
#91
I was able to download the 2.4 wallet before you guys took it offline.
I also downloaded the whole blockchain before I read something was wrong with the staking.
Can I use this blockchain for the fixed 2.4 version?

Regards

Goldmaxx



oh ok. yeah. that will be gone with 2.4.1. the thing thats taking me so long. is im sitting here. bit shifting large ints and converting the binary back to hex to figure out what is wrong with the kernel that at block 77050 it takes the negative version of the what should be checksum modifier

Well done with Trusted Cryptos concept, very encouraging!! Any eta on the new ECCoin wallet?


My old ECC v.2.3 wallet works fine and stakes fast.

can you point me to a download link, the ones on the website have been disabled
thanks

I have to ask Griffith to upload the 2.3 windows wallet again. I only have the MAC wallet available on  the server on this moment. But I think that the 2.4 wallet will be online this weekend. It will need a full redownload of the blockchain. The 2.4 wallet can only work with it's own blockchain, your old blockchain (2.3) can stay in your data folder, you can use it with the 2.3 wallet...simultaneous use is not possible because they use the same port.
legendary
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
April 15, 2015, 03:52:14 AM
#90

oh ok. yeah. that will be gone with 2.4.1. the thing thats taking me so long. is im sitting here. bit shifting large ints and converting the binary back to hex to figure out what is wrong with the kernel that at block 77050 it takes the negative version of the what should be checksum modifier

Well done with Trusted Cryptos concept, very encouraging!! Any eta on the new ECCoin wallet?


My old ECC v.2.3 wallet works fine and stakes fast.

can you point me to a download link, the ones on the website have been disabled
thanks

I have to ask Griffith to upload the 2.3 windows wallet again. I only have the MAC wallet available on  the server on this moment. But I think that the 2.4 wallet will be online this weekend. It will need a full redownload of the blockchain. The 2.4 wallet can only work with it's own blockchain, your old blockchain (2.3) can stay in your data folder, you can use it with the 2.3 wallet...simultaneous use is not possible because they use the same port.
hero member
Activity: 655
Merit: 500
April 15, 2015, 03:32:03 AM
#89

oh ok. yeah. that will be gone with 2.4.1. the thing thats taking me so long. is im sitting here. bit shifting large ints and converting the binary back to hex to figure out what is wrong with the kernel that at block 77050 it takes the negative version of the what should be checksum modifier

Well done with Trusted Cryptos concept, very encouraging!! Any eta on the new ECCoin wallet?


My old ECC v.2.3 wallet works fine and stakes fast.

can you point me to a download link, the ones on the website have been disabled
thanks
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
April 15, 2015, 03:29:05 AM
#88

oh ok. yeah. that will be gone with 2.4.1. the thing thats taking me so long. is im sitting here. bit shifting large ints and converting the binary back to hex to figure out what is wrong with the kernel that at block 77050 it takes the negative version of the what should be checksum modifier

Well done with Trusted Cryptos concept, very encouraging!! Any eta on the new ECCoin wallet?


My old ECC v.2.3 wallet works fine and stakes fast.
Jump to: