Topic: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning - page 819. (Read 2006403 times)

Quote from: roselee on July 27, 2016, 03:23:20 PM

Both chains are equally susceptible to replay. You move ETC, your ETH (if any) will move from the same address, and vice versa. Not sure how much more obvious it needs to be for you guys to understand it.

That is correct, just Google for ethereum fork replay attack and I do think you would probably start to overthink if you really move your coins now..

They didn't do the HF correctly or really safe

so what i posted is right ?
vitalik must be realy p... off.

what does another fork mean for the coin ?

A fork to fix an obvious issue shouldn't be as controversial as this recent one but it still needs to be coded, tested, and implemented, not to mention accepting responsibility to begin with. Apparently the Vitalik's Foundation would rather punt that to someone else.

how long could that take? and are the coins on risk till it is done ? means you cant move your cions ? right ? or should not

You can move the coins if you split them first:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15715049

I have no clue how long a proper fix would take to implement and considering that the main perp doesn't even accept responsibility it might well be "never".

Actually that splitting is problematic too, as if the underlying framework has some problems (like the DAO before) it COULD be attacked as well..

Read this:

http://vessenes.com/do-not-mess-with-eth-classic-it-will-f-you-up/

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: suchmoon on July 27, 2016, 02:12:04 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on July 27, 2016, 02:12:04 PM

Both chains are equally susceptible to replay. You move ETC, your ETH (if any) will move from the same address, and vice versa. Not sure how much more obvious it needs to be for you guys to understand it.

That is correct, just Google for ethereum fork replay attack and I do think you would probably start to overthink if you really move your coins now..

They didn't do the HF correctly or really safe

so what i posted is right ?
vitalik must be realy p... off.

what does another fork mean for the coin ?

A fork to fix an obvious issue shouldn't be as controversial as this recent one but it still needs to be coded, tested, and implemented, not to mention accepting responsibility to begin with. Apparently the Vitalik's Foundation would rather punt that to someone else.

how long could that take? and are the coins on risk till it is done ? means you cant move your cions ? right ? or should not

You can move the coins if you split them first:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15715049

I have no clue how long a proper fix would take to implement and considering that the main perp doesn't even accept responsibility it might well be "never".

Soul_eater_123

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

I think this signals the end for ETH. It will be forked to death. Well it was nice while it lasted.

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000

Both chains are equally susceptible to replay. You move ETC, your ETH (if any) will move from the same address, and vice versa. Not sure how much more obvious it needs to be for you guys to understand it.

That is correct, just Google for ethereum fork replay attack and I do think you would probably start to overthink if you really move your coins now..

They didn't do the HF correctly or really safe

so what i posted is right ?
vitalik must be realy p... off.

what does another fork mean for the coin ?

how long could that take? and are the coins on risk till it is done ? means you cant move your cions ? right ? or should not

A fork to fix an obvious issue shouldn't be as controversial as this recent one but it still needs to be coded, tested, and implemented, not to mention accepting responsibility to begin with. Apparently the Vitalik's Foundation would rather punt that to someone else.

tinaken_v

hero member

Activity: 561

Merit: 500

ETC dead

Fatman3001

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1014

Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC

Quote from: frostminer on July 27, 2016, 01:25:33 PM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on July 27, 2016, 01:23:50 PM

No, you're wrong. Eth is fine, your house is the one on fire.

Im pretty sure ETH is safe because of the fork, not the other way around.

Both chains are equally susceptible to replay. You move ETC, your ETH (if any) will move from the same address, and vice versa. Not sure how much more obvious it needs to be for you guys to understand it.

Ok, you might be right.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Both chains are equally susceptible to replay. You move ETC, your ETH (if any) will move from the same address, and vice versa. Not sure how much more obvious it needs to be for you guys to understand it.

That is correct, just Google for ethereum fork replay attack and I do think you would probably start to overthink if you really move your coins now..

They didn't do the HF correctly or really safe

so what i posted is right ?
vitalik must be realy p... off.

what does another fork mean for the coin ?

A fork to fix an obvious issue shouldn't be as controversial as this recent one but it still needs to be coded, tested, and implemented, not to mention accepting responsibility to begin with. Apparently the Vitalik's Foundation would rather punt that to someone else.

roselee

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1000